Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
$38.98
▼ $0.36 (-0.9%)
Market data updated: 09/30 04:27 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/30/2026
News analyzed: 09/30/2026
Market Cap
$3.56B
Day Range
$38.97 - $39.65
52-Week Range
$33.04 - $44.54
Beta
—
Next Earnings
27.10.2026
Support
$38.97
Resistance
$44.54
+5.7% (1Y)
Strengths: 6/24 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $50.85 vs. price $38.98 (+30.5%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -36.7%
Growth
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
40
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
46
Quality
55
Value
62
Momentum
9
Risk
64
Sentiment
32
Fundamental
50
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Renasant Corporation highlights its strong financial performance and leadership transitions. Analysts note a 36% year-over-year increase in earnings per share and an improved efficiency ratio, positioning the company attractively for investors. Additionally, the bank announced Catherine Mealor’s appointment as the next CFO, succeeding Jim Mabry, who will retire early 2027, with Mabry expected to join the board. The focus remains on operational strength and strategic leadership changes.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Renasant Corporation. News trend score: 32. Reason: 6 of the last 20 articles are negative, versus 3 positive.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
22
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
52
Psychology
99
Fundamentals
50
Technical
9
Valuation
62
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
-9%
Market Narrative
19
Fundamental Reality
52
Narrative Gap
-33
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests a neutral, herding-driven state—traders appear to be aligning with peer movements rather than reacting to extreme sentiment or momentum. The narrative gap (-15) hints at a disconnect where fundamentals (realityScore 52) slightly outweigh market perception (narrativeScore 37), but no dominant bias is active. The lack of volatility (0.91x ATR) and muted volume (0.98x avg) further indicate a cautious, non-emotional environment. The key question is whether this herding will persist or if external catalysts—like sector-specific news—could shift dynamics.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 07:21 AM
👥 What the crowd believes
"Renasant has delivered robust 2Q26 results, with EPS up 36% YoY and efficiency ratio improving to 57.9%"
"Catherine Mealor will join the company as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Jim Mabry, who has served as CFO since August 2020, will step down at the end of 2026."
"Renasant Corporation Declares Quarterly Dividend"
📈 7D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Thorstein Veblen — 13/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock divides methodologies sharply between those favoring long-term fundamentals and those skeptical of its value or timing. The most bullish approaches—Edgar Lawrence Smith’s 'buy-and-hold for a decade' mandate and Philip Fisher’s (though limited by data) high score—see it as a durable, patient-friendly opportunity, emphasizing enduring competitive advantages or growth potential. Meanwhile, the more cautious or cyclical frameworks, like Jesse Livermore’s trend-following or Jack Schwager’s neutral stance, dismiss it as either too ambiguous or lacking clear momentum. Even Benjamin Graham’s Defensive Investor finds it attractive, while his Enterprising counterpart and Peter Lynch’s growth criteria reject it as overpriced or lacking sufficient upside justification. The divide underscores whether the stock’s merits lie in its fundamentals (for long-term holders) or its speculative risks (for short-term traders or market skeptics).
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 100
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 20%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 100
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 98
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 94
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 86
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 85
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 80
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 76
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 75
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 73
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 48
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 46
Some discount, but not the deep 'net-net' bargain Graham's enterprising bar sets
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 31
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 29
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 13
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 289 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 11 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
—
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
4.7%
ROA
0.7%
ROIC
—
EPS
$2.09
Cash
$1.07B
Total Debt
$1.06B
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
0.27
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 16.9.2026 | $0.240 |
| 16.6.2026 | $0.240 |
| 15.6.2026 | $0.240 |
| 17.3.2026 | $0.230 |
| 16.3.2026 | $0.230 |
| 18.12.2025 | $0.230 |
| 17.12.2025 | $0.230 |
| 16.9.2025 | $0.220 |
| 15.9.2025 | $0.220 |
| 16.6.2025 | $0.220 |
| 15.6.2025 | $0.220 |
| 17.3.2025 | $0.220 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$38.98
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$50.85
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+30.5%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
10.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.0% | $261.53M | $239.93M |
| 2 | 8.1% | $282.78M | $238.01M |
| 3 | 6.3% | $300.45M | $232.00M |
| 4 | 4.4% | $313.59M | $222.16M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $321.43M | $208.91M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$237.75M
Terminal Value
$5.07B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$3.29B
Enterprise Value
$4.44B
Net Debt
$-15.19M
Equity Value
$4.45B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$44.39
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$26.65
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 3 positive, 11 neutral, 6 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 28.9.2026
Yahoo · 26.9.2026
Yahoo · 25.9.2026
Yahoo · 25.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 4.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 28.8.2026
Banking Dive · 28.8.2026
Yahoo · 26.8.2026
Northeast Mississippi Daily Journal, Tupelo · 26.8.2026
MT Newswires · 25.8.2026
Yahoo · 25.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 25.8.2026
Benzinga · 25.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 25.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 13.8.2026
StockStory · 3.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 31.7.2026
Renasant Corporation (RNST) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 40/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
RNST currently scores 40/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, RNST's estimated fair value is $50.85, which is 30.5% above the current price of $38.98. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
RNST's technical score is 9/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $50.85 vs. price $38.98 (+30.5%); Free cash flow growth: 156.3%; ATR: 2.0% of price.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -36.7%; Net income growth: -7.3%; Price is below the 50-day average.
Yes — RNST has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 8 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCGRAW EDWARD ROBINSON | Open Market Sale | 3.8.2026 | 35,000 | -35,000 | $43.88 |
| MCGRAW EDWARD ROBINSON | Open Market Sale | 3.8.2026 | 211,458 | -35,000 | $43.88 |
| Suggs Sean M. | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 161.69 | +161.69 | $41.23 |
| Suggs Sean M. | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 11,777 | +162 | $41.23 |
| Engel Connie L | Open Market Sale | 29.5.2026 | 1,257 | -1,257 | $40.90 |
| Engel Connie L | Open Market Sale | 29.5.2026 | 15,449 | -1,257 | $40.90 |
| DALE ALBERT J III | Open Market Sale | 19.5.2026 | 1,650 | -1,650 | $39.80 |
| DALE ALBERT J III | Open Market Sale | 19.5.2026 | 40,075 | -1,650 | $39.80 |
| MCGRAW EDWARD ROBINSON | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.5.2026 | 1,040 | +1,040 | $39.82 |
| MCGRAW EDWARD ROBINSON | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.5.2026 | 385 | -385 | $39.82 |
| MCGRAW EDWARD ROBINSON | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.5.2026 | 1,040 | -1,040 | — |
| MCGRAW EDWARD ROBINSON | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.5.2026 | 246,843 | +1,040 | $39.82 |
| MCGRAW EDWARD ROBINSON | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.5.2026 | 246,458 | -385 | $39.82 |
| MCGRAW EDWARD ROBINSON | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.5.2026 | 9,368 | -1,040 | — |
| WAYCASTER C MITCHELL | Open Market Sale | 14.5.2026 | 12,704 | -12,704 | $39.50 |
| WAYCASTER C MITCHELL | Open Market Sale | 14.5.2026 | 183,235 | -12,704 | $39.50 |
| LEVY JONATHAN A | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.4.2026 | 2,060 | +2,060 | — |
| HOLLAND NEAL A JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.4.2026 | 2,060 | +2,060 | — |
| PARKER TED E | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.4.2026 | 2,060 | +2,060 | — |
| Suggs Sean M. | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.4.2026 | 2,060 | +2,060 | — |
| Flenorl Rose J. | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.4.2026 | 2,060 | +2,060 | — |
| MCGRAW EDWARD ROBINSON | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.4.2026 | 2,060 | +2,060 | — |
| FOY JOHN | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.4.2026 | 2,060 | +2,060 | — |
| Moore Diana Renee | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.4.2026 | 2,060 | +2,060 | — |
| CREEKMORE JOHN | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.4.2026 | 2,060 | +2,060 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
4,792,309 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 4,464,371 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
71.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 78.6% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology