Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$21.47
▼ $0.42 (-1.9%)
Market data updated: 09/30 03:34 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/30/2026
News analyzed: 09/30/2026
Market Cap
$4.54B
Day Range
$21.16 - $22.09
52-Week Range
$12.08 - $27.48
Beta
—
Next Earnings
03.11.2026
Support
$19.52
Resistance
$27.48
RELY is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
+30.0% (1Y)
Strengths: 13/30 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $36.44 vs. price $21.47 (+69.7%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 5.0% of price
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
57
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
82
Quality
63
Value
57
Momentum
30
Risk
46
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
49
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Remitly Global, Inc. (RELY) highlights its record-breaking growth in the second quarter of 2026, with revenue, adjusted EBITDA, and net income reaching new highs alongside surpassing 10 million active customers. Analysts note concerns about one-time tax benefits and take-rate sustainability amid strong performance, while the stock’s 102.9% year-to-date surge raises valuation questions. The company has also been added to "Strong Buy" lists, reflecting optimism about its digital remittance platform’s scaling potential.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Remitly Global, Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 14 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
18
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
43
Psychology
20
Fundamentals
49
Technical
30
Valuation
57
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
-6%
Market Narrative
49
Fundamental Reality
43
Narrative Gap
+6
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests a dominant herd mentality, where RELY’s relative outperformance (-2.8% vs peers) attracts followers seeking alignment. Euphoria lingers due to momentum, extreme sentiment, and valuation disconnect (price vs. DCF), but overconfidence remains muted by the deep discount. The key open question is whether the narrative gap (57 vs. 43) will widen, pulling sentiment further from reality—or if fundamentals will reassert balance. The lack of panic or loss aversion signals complacency, not urgency.
Updated: 09/07/2026, 03:36 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Revenue, adjusted EBITDA, and net income all hit new highs... active customers crossed 10 million"
"RELY has been added to the Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) List"
"Remitly Global may see its valuation supported if it can keep scaling its digital remittance platform efficiently, although any pressure on profitability or cash generation could..."
"Remitly Global (RELY) could be a great choice for investors looking to make a profit from fundamentally strong stocks that are currently on the move"
📈 3D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 31/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide between methodologies, with some legendary investors seeing it as a high-conviction opportunity while others warn of hidden risks or overvaluation. The bullish camp—led by Walter Bagehot (100), Peter Lynch (96), and Philip Fisher (75)—highlights its liquidity, growth potential, and exceptional quality, suggesting it could weather crises or outperform over time. Meanwhile, more cautious frameworks like Howard Marks (57), Benjamin Graham (50), and the Enterprising Investor variant (31) flag concerns: either the stock’s strengths are already priced in, its profitability is uncertain, or it doesn’t meet strict valuation thresholds. The middle ground, represented by investors like Gerald Loeb (53) or the efficient-market proponents (48), acknowledges its merits but questions whether the effort justifies the reward, while the most bearish—like Schwager (36) or Marks’ late-cycle view (29)—see it as a setup too risky or mispriced for disciplined strategies.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 100
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 96
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 75
Exceptional company quality by Fisher's standards
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 73
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 72
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 70
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 68
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 63
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 61
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 59
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 59
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 55
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 53
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 48
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 42
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 287 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (2 bullish · 8 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
4.7%
Net Margin
4.2%
EBITDA Margin
6.3%
ROE
7.8%
ROA
4.7%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.33
Cash
$542.43M
Total Debt
$157.82M
Current Ratio
3.30
Debt/Equity
0.18
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$21.47
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$36.44
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+69.7%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
25.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25.0% | $369.56M | $339.05M |
| 2 | 19.4% | $441.17M | $371.32M |
| 3 | 13.8% | $501.83M | $387.50M |
| 4 | 8.1% | $542.60M | $384.39M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $556.17M | $361.47M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$295.65M
Terminal Value
$8.77B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$5.70B
Enterprise Value
$7.54B
Net Debt
$-384.61M
Equity Value
$7.93B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$3.99
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$3.73
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 14 positive, 6 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 29.9.2026
Yahoo · 26.9.2026
Yahoo · 26.9.2026
Yahoo · 25.9.2026
Yahoo · 24.9.2026
Yahoo · 24.9.2026
Benzinga · 23.9.2026
Yahoo · 23.9.2026
ChartMill · 22.9.2026
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
MT Newswires · 9.9.2026
Motley Fool · 9.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Zacks · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 4.9.2026
Remitly Global, Inc. (RELY) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 57/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
RELY currently scores 57/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, RELY's estimated fair value is $36.44, which is 69.7% above the current price of $21.47. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
RELY's technical score is 30/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $36.44 vs. price $21.47 (+69.7%); Revenue growth (last year): 29.4%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 263.2%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 5.0% of price; Calmar: -0.09 (3y annualized return -5.2% / max drawdown 57.9%); Price is below the 50-day average.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for RELY.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 19 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hug Joshua | Open Market Sale | 9.9.2026 | 2,658,889 | -5,500 | $24.30 |
| Hug Joshua | Open Market Sale | 9.9.2026 | 5,500 | -5,500 | $24.30 |
| Hug Joshua | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 2,664,389 | -5,500 | $25.03 |
| Hug Joshua | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 5,500 | -5,500 | $25.03 |
| MORRIS NIGEL W | Open Market Sale | 2.9.2026 | 1,804,756 | -6,300 | $27.03 |
| MORRIS NIGEL W | Open Market Sale | 2.9.2026 | 6,300 | -6,300 | $27.03 |
| Sharma Pankaj | Open Market Sale | 28.8.2026 | 716,022 | -21,000 | $26.39 |
| Sharma Pankaj | Open Market Sale | 28.8.2026 | 21,000 | -21,000 | $26.39 |
| Mehta Vikas D | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 25,000 | -25,000 | $26.15 |
| Mehta Vikas D | Tax Withholding in Shares | 25.8.2026 | 19,269 | -19,269 | $26.59 |
| Sharma Pankaj | Tax Withholding in Shares | 25.8.2026 | 15,788 | -15,788 | $26.59 |
| Gunningham Sebastian J | Tax Withholding in Shares | 25.8.2026 | 22,809 | -22,809 | $26.59 |
| Mehta Vikas D | Tax Withholding in Shares | 25.8.2026 | 968,735 | -19,269 | $26.59 |
| Sharma Pankaj | Tax Withholding in Shares | 25.8.2026 | 737,022 | -15,788 | $26.59 |
| Mehta Vikas D | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 943,735 | -25,000 | $26.15 |
| Gunningham Sebastian J | Tax Withholding in Shares | 25.8.2026 | 741,840 | -22,809 | $26.59 |
| MORRIS NIGEL W | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 16,751 | -16,751 | $26.56 |
| MORRIS NIGEL W | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 1,811,056 | -16,751 | $26.56 |
| MORRIS NIGEL W | Open Market Sale | 18.8.2026 | 1,827,807 | -3,249 | $26.53 |
| MORRIS NIGEL W | Open Market Sale | 18.8.2026 | 3,249 | -3,249 | $26.53 |
| MORRIS NIGEL W | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 1,831,056 | -20,000 | $26.26 |
| MORRIS NIGEL W | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 20,000 | -20,000 | $26.26 |
| MORRIS NIGEL W | Open Market Sale | 14.8.2026 | 1,851,056 | -20,000 | $26.20 |
| MORRIS NIGEL W | Open Market Sale | 14.8.2026 | 20,000 | -20,000 | $26.20 |
| MORRIS NIGEL W | Open Market Sale | 13.8.2026 | 1,871,056 | -11,000 | $25.59 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
18,265,219 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 16,952,028 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
61.2% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 62.9% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology