Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$78.55
▼ $0.51 (-0.6%)
Market data updated: 09/27 04:54 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/26/2026
News analyzed: 09/27/2026
Market Cap
$1.26B
Day Range
$77.65 - $80.39
52-Week Range
$33.40 - $80.39
Beta
—
Next Earnings
03.11.2026
Support
$58.71
Resistance
$80.39
RDVT is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
+52.7% (1Y)
Strengths: 16/28 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 20.0%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $45.42 vs. price $78.55 (-42.2%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (82/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (33/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
69
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of September 2, 2026
Then
70
$75.56
Now
69
$78.55
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
82
Quality
58
Value
33
Momentum
82
Risk
56
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
65
Institutional
12
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Red Violet, Inc. highlights its strong market momentum and investor optimism. The company’s stock has hit new all-time highs, with a 40% gain over the past year, and analysts like Needham have initiated coverage with a Buy rating and a $90 price target. Red Violet’s identity intelligence platform and aggressive mergers and acquisitions (M&A) strategy are central themes, alongside its upcoming presentations at major investor conferences (Citi’s Global TMT and Lake Street’s BIG10). Financial metrics, including earnings beats and robust cash flow, further underscore its growth potential.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Red Violet, Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 18 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
53
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
41
Psychology
61
Fundamentals
65
Technical
82
Valuation
33
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
+30%
Market Narrative
83
Fundamental Reality
41
Narrative Gap
+42
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior here is dominated by anchoring, with traders fixating on a near-term resistance level just 1.6% above current price. This aligns with a large narrative-reality gap (46 points), where optimism (87) vastly exceeds objective fundamentals (41). Euphoria and overconfidence further suggest investors may be overestimating momentum’s sustainability, while FOMO’s moderate presence hints at opportunistic buying. The key open question is whether the stock can sustain its momentum past this resistance or if anchoring will trigger profit-taking.
Updated: 09/08/2026, 02:34 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Needham analyst initiates coverage on Red Violet with a Buy rating and announces Price Target of $90"
"Red Violet (RDVT) demonstrates strong price momentum, with its shares up more than 40% over the past year. RDVT stock is trading at a new all-time high."
"Red Violet (RDVT) clears all 8 of Navellier's growth rules: revisions, earnings beats, 20% sales growth, expanding margins, strong cash flow, high ROE"
"Red Violet outlined its identity intelligence platform, growth strategy and plans to use recently raised capital for acquisitions"
📈 10D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 13/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for RDVT reflects deep methodological disagreements about risk, growth, and valuation. Walter Bagehot’s near-perfect score highlights his focus on liquidity and resilience, suggesting the stock could weather financial stress—an approach starkly contrasting with Samuel Nelson’s low score, which flags it as overbought and cyclically stretched. Meanwhile, Peter Lynch’s high score emphasizes growth potential, while Benjamin Graham’s low marks underscore his strict valuation and defensive criteria, leaving little room for speculative bets. The middle-ground methodologies—like Philip Fisher’s cautious endorsement or Gerald Loeb’s moderate risk assessment—highlight a stock that may have *some* merit but lacks the exceptional quality or disciplined setup preferred by others. Even efficient-market theorists dismiss it as unconvincing, reinforcing the tension between active stock-picking and passive indexing.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 100
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 79
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 71
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 64
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 63
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 60
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 54
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 51
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 37
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 30
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 29
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🔴 22
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 19
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 18
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 13
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 285 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (8 bullish · 1 bearish · 3 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
14.6%
Net Margin
14.6%
EBITDA Margin
26.4%
ROE
13.0%
ROA
11.7%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.94
Cash
$43.56M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
7.18
Debt/Equity
—
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 31.1.2025 | $0.300 |
| 30.1.2025 | $0.300 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$78.55
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$45.42
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-42.2%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
19.3%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 19.3% | $34.34M | $31.50M |
| 2 | 15.1% | $39.52M | $33.26M |
| 3 | 10.9% | $43.82M | $33.84M |
| 4 | 6.7% | $46.75M | $33.12M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $47.92M | $31.15M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$28.79M
Terminal Value
$755.67M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$491.14M
Enterprise Value
$654.00M
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$654.00M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$7.01
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$3.92
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 18 positive, 0 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 25.9.2026
Yahoo · 24.9.2026
Yahoo · 24.9.2026
Yahoo · 23.9.2026
Yahoo · 23.9.2026
ChartMill · 22.9.2026
Yahoo · 20.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 13.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 13.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 7.9.2026
Zacks · 7.9.2026
Benzinga · 1.9.2026
Benzinga · 1.9.2026
Yahoo · 31.8.2026
Barchart · 31.8.2026
ChartMill · 31.8.2026
Yahoo · 29.8.2026
Red Violet, Inc. (RDVT) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 69/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
RDVT currently scores 69/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, RDVT's estimated fair value is $45.42, which is 42.2% below the current price of $78.55. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
RDVT's technical score is 82/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 20.0%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 82.0%; Free cash flow growth: 21.0%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $45.42 vs. price $78.55 (-42.2%); P/E: 86.3; Volume is falling despite the price advance — possible weakening.
Yes — RDVT has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 2 purchases and 15 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIVEK WILLIAM PAUL | Open Market Purchase | 27.8.2026 | 22,733 | +2,000 | $71.49 |
| LIVEK WILLIAM PAUL | Open Market Purchase | 27.8.2026 | 2,000 | +2,000 | $71.49 |
| Strakosch Greg | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.6.2026 | 2,088 | +2,088 | — |
| LIVEK WILLIAM PAUL | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.6.2026 | 2,088 | +2,088 | — |
| Stanton Lisa M. | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.6.2026 | 2,179 | +2,179 | — |
| Rubin Steven D | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.6.2026 | 2,179 | +2,179 | — |
| Rubin Steven D | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.6.2026 | 147,767 | +2,179 | — |
| Strakosch Greg | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.6.2026 | 7,955 | +2,088 | — |
| LIVEK WILLIAM PAUL | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.6.2026 | 20,733 | +2,088 | — |
| Stanton Lisa M. | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.6.2026 | 33,444 | +2,179 | — |
| Reilly James Patrick | Open Market Sale | 1.6.2026 | 6,000 | -6,000 | $57.62 |
| Dubner Derek | Open Market Sale | 1.6.2026 | 6,000 | -6,000 | $57.62 |
| MacLachlan Daniel | Open Market Sale | 1.6.2026 | 6,000 | -6,000 | $57.24 |
| Reilly James Patrick | Open Market Sale | 1.6.2026 | 6,000 | -6,000 | $57.24 |
| DELL JEFFREY ALAN | Open Market Sale | 1.6.2026 | 5,000 | -5,000 | $57.62 |
| MacLachlan Daniel | Open Market Sale | 1.6.2026 | 6,000 | -6,000 | $57.62 |
| DELL JEFFREY ALAN | Open Market Sale | 1.6.2026 | 5,000 | -5,000 | $57.25 |
| Dubner Derek | Open Market Sale | 1.6.2026 | 6,000 | -6,000 | $57.24 |
| Dubner Derek | Open Market Sale | 1.6.2026 | 563,273 | -6,000 | $57.62 |
| Dubner Derek | Open Market Sale | 1.6.2026 | 557,273 | -6,000 | $57.24 |
| MacLachlan Daniel | Open Market Sale | 1.6.2026 | 364,902 | -6,000 | $57.62 |
| MacLachlan Daniel | Open Market Sale | 1.6.2026 | 358,902 | -6,000 | $57.24 |
| Reilly James Patrick | Open Market Sale | 1.6.2026 | 238,351 | -6,000 | $57.62 |
| Reilly James Patrick | Open Market Sale | 1.6.2026 | 232,351 | -6,000 | $57.24 |
| DELL JEFFREY ALAN | Open Market Sale | 1.6.2026 | 160,889 | -5,000 | $57.62 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
608,708 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 526,863 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
64.3% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 69.7% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology