Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
$32.75
▼ $0.25 (-0.8%)
Market data updated: 09/30 01:10 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/30/2026
News analyzed: 09/30/2026
Market Cap
$4.33B
Day Range
$32.36 - $33.26
52-Week Range
$31.50 - $41.05
Beta
—
Next Earnings
02.11.2026
Support
$32.36
Resistance
$39.98
-10.1% (1Y)
Strengths: 3/21 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Net margin
Net margin: 48.7% — strong
Fundamental
Biggest negative driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): -0.8%
Growth
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
46
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
today · $32.75
Evidence: Panic-selling score jumped from 6 to 31 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
40
Quality
No data available
Value
60
Momentum
6
Risk
50
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
60
Institutional
29
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Radian Group Inc. has centered on its latest quarterly results, which exceeded expectations due to higher net premiums, increased new insurance written, and solid investment income. Investors are weighing the company’s strong operational performance against rising expenses and primary loan defaults, while its stock—up nearly 95% over five years—remains a cautious buy despite recent short-term volatility. Analysts also highlight its consistent capital returns through dividends and share repurchases.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Radian Group Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 11 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
28
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
38
Psychology
76
Fundamentals
60
Technical
6
Valuation
60
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
Price (3M)
-13%
Market Narrative
55
Fundamental Reality
38
Narrative Gap
+17
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant anchoring behavior suggests traders are fixated on the 0.9% support level, likely due to its proximity. Confirmation bias may amplify this by favoring narratives over stagnant revenue data. Herding and FOMO remain muted, as the stock underperformed peers and lacks momentum. The key question is whether traders will break free from the support anchor or reinforce it with further consolidation. The narrative gap widens the risk of anchoring persistence unless reality aligns with expectations.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 07:18 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"delivered stronger-than-expected results, supported by higher net premiums earned"
"continuing to return capital through share repurchases and dividends"
"stock has almost doubled over the past five years, yet recent short term softness"
"Radian Group's disciplined specialty underwriting and diversification help offset softer pricing"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 6D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Benjamin Graham — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Peter Lynch — 25/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for RDN reflects deep methodological differences in how these investors evaluate stocks. Benjamin Graham’s defensive and enterprising frameworks both score highly—99 and 71—because they prioritize intrinsic value and margin of safety, likely finding the stock’s fundamentals compelling enough for a disciplined buyer. In contrast, technical and cyclical approaches like Samuel Armstrong Nelson (91) and Gerald M. Loeb (63) see it as a tactical play, either near oversold levels or with moderate risk, while others like Howard Marks (52) and Walter Bagehot (50) are cautious, questioning whether the stock’s strengths are already priced in or lack sufficient structural support. Meanwhile, growth-focused investors like Philip Fisher (43) and Peter Lynch (21) dismiss it outright, as their criteria for sustainable earnings power or reasonable valuation aren’t met, highlighting a clear tension between value and growth philosophies.
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 100
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 100
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 83
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 77
Deep statistical discount — a real Enterprising Investor candidate
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 76
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 65
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 56
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 55
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 52
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 50
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 43
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 43
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 43
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 31
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 25
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 287 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 11 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
48.7%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
12.2%
ROA
7.2%
ROIC
—
EPS
$4.18
Cash
$24.83M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
—
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 24.8.2026 | $0.255 |
| 2.6.2026 | $0.255 |
| 1.6.2026 | $0.255 |
| 23.2.2026 | $0.255 |
| 22.2.2026 | $0.255 |
| 24.11.2025 | $0.255 |
| 23.11.2025 | $0.255 |
| 25.8.2025 | $0.255 |
| 24.8.2025 | $0.255 |
| 2.6.2025 | $0.255 |
| 1.6.2025 | $0.255 |
| 24.2.2025 | $0.255 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$33.96
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$33.96
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 11 positive, 8 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
StockStory · 28.9.2026
Zacks · 24.9.2026
StockStory · 18.9.2026
Zacks · 15.9.2026
StockStory · 11.9.2026
Business Wire · 10.9.2026
StockStory · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Zacks · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 6.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 6.9.2026
Yahoo · 5.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 5.9.2026
Yahoo · 5.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 5.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Zacks · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Radian Group Inc. (RDN) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 46/100, rated "Moderate" (a partial score — based on only 6 of 7 categories, some data is currently unavailable). The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
RDN currently scores 46/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure (a partial score — based on only 6 of 7 categories, some data is currently unavailable). StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
RDN's technical score is 6/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Net margin: 48.7% — strong; NAV per share: $33.96; P/E: 7.9.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): -0.8%; Net income growth: -3.6%; Price is below the 50-day average.
Yes — RDN has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 4 purchases and 10 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bartholomew Meghan | Open Market Sale | 14.9.2026 | 7,812 | -7,812 | $35.94 |
| CULANG HOWARD BERNARD | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.9.2026 | 503.798 | +503.798 | — |
| McCarthy Barry C | Grant/Award from Employer | 12.8.2026 | 3,427 | +3,427 | — |
| McCarthy Barry C | Grant/Award from Employer | 12.8.2026 | 3,427 | +3,427 | — |
| Hoffman Edward J | Open Market Sale | 14.7.2026 | 20,000 | -20,000 | $39.00 |
| Hoffman Edward J | Open Market Sale | 14.7.2026 | 126,543 | -20,000 | $39.00 |
| CULANG HOWARD BERNARD | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.6.2026 | 521.221 | +521.221 | — |
| CULANG HOWARD BERNARD | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.6.2026 | 14,166 | +521 | — |
| Conner Brad L. | Open Market Sale | 3.6.2026 | 1,200 | -1,200 | $33.93 |
| Bartholomew Meghan | Open Market Sale | 3.6.2026 | 0.944 | -0.944 | $34.68 |
| Bartholomew Meghan | Open Market Sale | 3.6.2026 | 47,015 | -1 | $34.68 |
| Conner Brad L. | Open Market Sale | 3.6.2026 | 37,649 | -1,200 | $33.93 |
| Weinbach Michael S | Open Market Purchase | 2.6.2026 | 49,513 | +49,513 | $34.04 |
| Weinbach Michael S | Open Market Purchase | 2.6.2026 | 170,000 | +49,513 | $34.04 |
| Weinbach Michael S | Open Market Purchase | 1.6.2026 | 120,487 | +120,487 | $33.89 |
| Weinbach Michael S | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 185,020 | +185,020 | — |
| Weinbach Michael S | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 150,000 | +150,000 | — |
| Weinbach Michael S | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 77,090 | +77,090 | — |
| Weinbach Michael S | Open Market Purchase | 1.6.2026 | 120,487 | +120,487 | $33.89 |
| Weinbach Michael S | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 150,000 | +150,000 | — |
| Weinbach Michael S | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 185,020 | +185,020 | — |
| Weinbach Michael S | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 77,090 | +77,090 | — |
| Leyden Margaret Anne | Open Market Sale | 29.5.2026 | 2,070 | -2,070 | $34.59 |
| Leyden Margaret Anne | Open Market Sale | 29.5.2026 | 6,864 | -2,070 | $34.59 |
| CULANG HOWARD BERNARD | Open Market Sale | 27.5.2026 | 3,612 | -3,612 | $36.00 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
5,544,199 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 5,273,618 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
55.4% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 57.2% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology