Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$1.99
▲ $0.02 (+1.0%)
Market data updated: 09/30 03:22 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/30/2026
News analyzed: 09/30/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$1.96 - $2.03
52-Week Range
$0.94 - $2.41
Beta
—
Next Earnings
12.11.2026
Support
$1.31
Resistance
$2.41
RDI is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
+36.3% (1Y)
Strengths: 13/32 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟡 Mixed
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 60.8%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$11.22 vs. price $1.99 (-663.7%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (68/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (38/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
50
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
Not enough data yet to generate this synthesis.
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
68
Quality
63
Value
38
Momentum
58
Risk
32
Sentiment
50
Fundamental
32
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
26
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
36
Fundamentals
32
Technical
58
Valuation
38
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+52%
Market Narrative
34
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
-8
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Thorstein Veblen — 80/100
🔴 Weakest match
Walter Bagehot — 25/100
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 80
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 80
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 71
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 63
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 60
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 57
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 48
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 48
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 48
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 46
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 43
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 36
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 33
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 25
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 0
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 20%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 287 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟡 Indicators are mixed — no clear bias (5 bullish · 5 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
-2.6%
Net Margin
-7.0%
EBITDA Margin
3.9%
ROE
77.5%
ROA
-3.3%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$0.62
Cash
$10.53M
Total Debt
$221.09M
Current Ratio
0.17
Debt/Equity
-12.12
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$1.99
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$11.22
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-663.7%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
0.2%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.2% | $-2.92M | $-2.68M |
| 2 | 0.8% | $-2.94M | $-2.47M |
| 3 | 1.3% | $-2.98M | $-2.30M |
| 4 | 1.9% | $-3.04M | $-2.15M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-3.11M | $-2.02M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-2.91M
Terminal Value
$-49.10M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-31.91M
Enterprise Value
$-43.54M
Net Debt
$210.56M
Equity Value
$-254.10M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
-$0.81
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$1.96
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 0 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 0 articles.
No recent articles found for this stock.
Reading International Inc - Class A Non-voting (RDI) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 50/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
RDI currently scores 50/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, RDI's estimated fair value is -$11.22, which is 663.7% below the current price of $1.99. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
RDI's technical score is 58/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 60.8%; Free cash flow growth: 68.9%; Net income growth: 59.9%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$11.22 vs. price $1.99 (-663.7%); Operating margin: -2.6% (negative); Net margin: -7.0% (negative).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for RDI.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COTTER ELLEN M | Grant/Award from Employer | 27.4.2026 | 269,043 | +269,043 | — |
| SMERLING ROBERT F | Grant/Award from Employer | 27.4.2026 | 42,530 | +42,530 | — |
| COTTER MARGARET | Grant/Award from Employer | 27.4.2026 | 76,638 | +76,638 | — |
| Lucas Steven John | Grant/Award from Employer | 27.4.2026 | 31,927 | +31,927 | — |
| Avanes Gilbert | Grant/Award from Employer | 27.4.2026 | 111,344 | +111,344 | — |
| Tompkins Sidney Craig | Grant/Award from Employer | 27.4.2026 | 78,905 | +78,905 | — |
| COTTER ELLEN M | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 21.4.2026 | 1,066,822 | +70,196 | — |
| COTTER ELLEN M | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 21.4.2026 | 15,576 | -70,196 | — |
| COTTER MARGARET | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 21.4.2026 | 875,082 | +24,704 | — |
| COTTER MARGARET | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 21.4.2026 | 11,390 | -24,704 | — |
| COTTER ELLEN M | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 18.4.2026 | 996,626 | +11,990 | — |
| COTTER ELLEN M | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 18.4.2026 | 0 | -11,990 | — |
| SMERLING ROBERT F | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 18.4.2026 | 109,945 | +8,768 | — |
| SMERLING ROBERT F | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 18.4.2026 | 0 | -8,768 | — |
| COTTER MARGARET | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 18.4.2026 | 850,378 | +8,768 | — |
| COTTER MARGARET | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 18.4.2026 | 0 | -8,768 | — |
| Lucas Steven John | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 18.4.2026 | 32,091 | +3,685 | — |
| Lucas Steven John | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 18.4.2026 | 0 | -3,685 | — |
| Avanes Gilbert | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 18.4.2026 | 134,386 | +8,768 | — |
| Avanes Gilbert | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 18.4.2026 | 0 | -8,768 | — |
| Tompkins Sidney Craig | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 18.4.2026 | 152,419 | +8,768 | — |
| Tompkins Sidney Craig | Tax Withholding in Shares | 18.4.2026 | 148,259 | -4,160 | — |
| Tompkins Sidney Craig | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 18.4.2026 | 0 | -8,768 | — |
| SMERLING ROBERT F | Tax Withholding in Shares | 11.4.2026 | 101,177 | +24,400 | — |
| SMERLING ROBERT F | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 11.4.2026 | 11,250 | -24,400 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
36,165 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 50,081 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
38.5% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 22.0% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology