Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Information Technology · ·
$117.13
▲ $2.27 (+2.0%)
Market data updated: 09/18 08:58 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/17/2026
News analyzed: 09/18/2026
Market Cap
$24.50B
Day Range
$116.20 - $119.23
52-Week Range
$70.50 - $177.28
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
Q is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
+23.1% (1Y)
Strengths: 4/26 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Liquidity risk
Current ratio: 1.95
Risk
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 4.9% of price
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 0 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 0
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
49
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
48
Quality
50
Value
45
Momentum
15
Risk
48
Sentiment
98
Fundamental
69
Institutional
33
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING Q...
Recent media coverage of Qnity Electronics has centered on its strategic push into advanced semiconductor packaging, particularly with the launch of its **Stackplane CMP slurry platform**, designed for AI and high-performance computing applications. The company is positioning itself to meet rising demand in chip stacking and integration technologies, with plans to showcase Stackplane at industry events like SEMICON Taiwan. While the stock saw strong gains year-to-date (up 40.5%), recent price declines and valuation concerns have sparked debate over whether current market sentiment already reflects its growth potential. Leadership changes and product updates have kept the company in analyst focus.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Qnity Electronics. News trend score: 98. Reason: 9 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
17
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
38
Psychology
81
Fundamentals
69
Technical
15
Valuation
45
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-31%
Market Narrative
61
Fundamental Reality
38
Narrative Gap
+23
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior here is dominated by **Loss Aversion**, as the stock’s 3-month decline and subdued volume suggest investors are hesitant to realize losses. The narrative gap (54 vs. 38) hints at a disconnect where optimism (e.g., perfect news sentiment) clashes with technical reality, but this doesn’t override the defensive posture of loss-averse traders. The absence of panic or euphoria signals a cautious, risk-averse stance—likely waiting for clearer catalysts. The key question is whether the subdued volume reflects temporary hesitation or a structural shift in investor sentiment.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 07:13 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Qnity Electronics introduced its Stackplane CMP slurry platform for advanced packaging aimed at AI and high-performance computing applications."
"The current enthusiasm for semiconductors has also led to hefty tailwinds for Qnity Electronics."
"Qnity Electronics has seen its 7-day share price return decline 5.39% and its 90-day return fall 23.31%."
"Recent product and leadership updates keep interest high, which puts extra focus on whether the current price already embeds a lot of good news."
📈 12D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 80/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 23/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on each investor's documented principles, the model estimates that cycle‑oriented methodologies such as Nelson, Mackay, Howard Marks (market‑cycle) and Smith view the stock favorably, citing a supportive cycle position, lack of crowd mania, early‑mid cycle status and a disciplined risk‑reward setup. More conservative or liquidity‑focused approaches like Bagehot, Marks (general), Fisher, Loeb and the efficient‑market view find the stock only adequate, flagging high expectations, modest growth signatures and moderate capital risk. Value‑centric frameworks—Graham’s defensive and enterprising criteria, Lynch’s growth‑at‑a‑reasonable‑price bar, and Veblen’s disdain for growth pursued for its own sake—rate the stock poorly, indicating insufficient safety margins and quality. Finally, volatility‑sensitive and trend‑driven rules from Housel, Livermore and others signal negative sentiment, emphasizing the stock’s volatility and a trend that runs counter to their core trading doctrines.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 80
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 76
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 71
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 68
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 66
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 60
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 53
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 44
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 43
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 41
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 28
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 27
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 27
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 26
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 23
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 224 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 9 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
46.2%
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
15.3%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
10.3%
ROA
5.2%
ROIC
—
EPS
$3.30
Cash
$915.00M
Total Debt
$4.12B
Current Ratio
1.95
Debt/Equity
0.58
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 31.8.2026 | $0.080 |
| 29.5.2026 | $0.080 |
| 28.5.2026 | $0.080 |
| 27.2.2026 | $0.080 |
| 26.2.2026 | $0.080 |
| 28.11.2025 | $0.060 |
| 27.11.2025 | $0.060 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$33.82
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$7.33
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 10 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
ChartMill · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 10.9.2026
MT Newswires · 10.9.2026
PR Newswire · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Benzinga · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 4.9.2026
ChartMill · 1.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 1.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 1.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 1.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 31.8.2026
Yahoo · 31.8.2026
Business Wire · 31.8.2026
Benzinga · 31.8.2026
Qnity Electronics (Q) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 49/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
Q currently scores 49/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Q's technical score is 15/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Current ratio: 1.95; Gross margin: 46.2% — strong; Net margin: 15.3% — strong.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 4.9% of price; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -0.3%; Price is below the 50-day average.
Yes — Q has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 2 purchases and 4 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CURTIN TERRENCE R | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.8.2026 | 272.126 | +272.126 | $119.43 |
| Green Byron | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.8.2026 | 272.126 | +272.126 | $119.43 |
| De Bondt Karin | Open Market Purchase | 11.8.2026 | 1,000 | +1,000 | $138.14 |
| De Bondt Karin | Open Market Purchase | 11.8.2026 | 6,647 | +1,000 | $138.14 |
| Dei Cas Katherine | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.8.2026 | 2,937 | +2,937 | — |
| Dei Cas Katherine | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.8.2026 | 2,937 | +2,937 | — |
| Fortebuono Kathleen M. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 12.6.2026 | 418.02 | -418.02 | $149.76 |
| Fortebuono Kathleen M. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 12.6.2026 | 8,460 | -418 | $149.76 |
| Sterin Steven | Open Market Sale | 5.6.2026 | 400 | -400 | $148.35 |
| Sterin Steven | Open Market Sale | 5.6.2026 | 12,195 | -400 | $148.35 |
| CURTIN TERRENCE R | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.5.2026 | 208.333 | +208.333 | $156.00 |
| Green Byron | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.5.2026 | 208.333 | +208.333 | $156.00 |
| CURTIN TERRENCE R | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.5.2026 | 22,053 | +208 | $156.00 |
| Green Byron | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.5.2026 | 7,860 | +208 | $156.00 |
| Sterin Steven | Open Market Sale | 26.5.2026 | 511 | -511 | $161.97 |
| Sterin Steven | Open Market Sale | 26.5.2026 | 12,595 | -511 | $161.97 |
| CURTIN TERRENCE R | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 1,278 | +1,278 | — |
| JOHNSON KRISTINA M | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 1,278 | +1,278 | — |
| Noonan Anne P | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 1,278 | +1,278 | — |
| De Bondt Karin | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 1,278 | +1,278 | — |
| PAIK YI HYON | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 1,278 | +1,278 | — |
| BLINN MARK A | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 1,278 | +1,278 | — |
| Banerji Shumeet | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 1,278 | +1,278 | — |
| Green Byron | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 1,278 | +1,278 | — |
| Sterin Steven | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 1,278 | +1,278 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
4,552,694 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 4,895,914 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
51.3% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 41.7% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology