Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Staples · ·
$27.27
▼ $0.84 (-3.0%)
Market data updated: 09/30 03:28 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/30/2026
News analyzed: 09/30/2026
Market Cap
$6.49B
Day Range
$27.23 - $28.15
52-Week Range
$25.90 - $44.84
Beta
—
Next Earnings
28.10.2026
Support
$25.90
Resistance
$32.85
PPC is a stock from the Consumer Defensive sector — Food, beverages, and household products — steady demand even in a recession, since these are essential consumer goods.
-30.1% (1Y)
Strengths: 9/32 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $45.33 vs. price $27.27 (+66.2%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 0.14 (3y annualized return 7.6% / max drawdown 52.9%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
47
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
1d ago · $28.11
Evidence: Narrative Gap moved from 27 to -8 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
34
Quality
63
Value
67
Momentum
16
Risk
48
Sentiment
68
Fundamental
63
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation has centered on its financial strategies and market challenges. The company announced a €500 million senior notes offering, signaling efforts to secure funding amid industry-wide pressures. However, its shares declined alongside peers due to national cattle shortages and squeezed operating margins, prompting profit warnings and margin concerns. Analysts also noted volatility in livestock prices as a key risk factor.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Pilgrim's Pride Corporation. News trend score: 68. Reason: 7 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 4 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
15
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
75
Fundamentals
63
Technical
16
Valuation
67
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+0%
Market Narrative
32
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
-10
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for PPC suggests a narrative-reality alignment (gap: -1) with herding as the dominant psychological state, driven by relative underperformance. The stock’s negative momentum (-4.0% ROC) and underperformance vs. peers (-1.6% vs. -0.4%) imply traders are following broader sector trends rather than individual conviction. However, low volatility (0.95x ATR) and neutral RSI (50) temper extreme panic or FOMO. The key open question: *Is this herding a tactical underweight or a structural mispricing signal?*
Updated: 09/08/2026, 10:24 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"national cattle shortages and volatile livestock prices squeezed operating margins"
"A company that generates cash isn’t automatically a winner. Some businesses stockpile cash but fail to reinvest wisely"
"What's next for the stock? We take a look at earnings estimates for some clues."
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 3D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 92/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 15/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for PPC reflects deep methodological differences in how these investors weigh risk, valuation, and market psychology. Benjamin Graham’s defensive and enterprising models split sharply—his traditional approach finds the stock attractively undervalued, while his enterprising bar demands a far deeper bargain. Meanwhile, cycle-focused thinkers like Howard Marks (both general and market-cycle) and Samuel Nelson see it as reasonably priced but not in an extreme oversold state, contrasting sharply with Peter Lynch or Philip Fisher, who dismiss it outright for lacking growth or quality. The efficiency market camp and volatility-sensitive models (like Morgan Housel’s) further complicate the picture, suggesting the stock’s appeal is either overrated or too risky for patient long-term holders, while trend-followers like Livermore and Schwager outright reject it as a setup. The middle-ground methodologies (Mackay, Bagehot, Veblen) offer cautious optimism, but even they acknowledge limitations in liquidity or profit translation—highlighting how subjective criteria can turn a stock from a defensive Graham gem to a Fisher discard.
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 92
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 90
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 82
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 78
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 70
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 59
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 57
Some discount, but not the deep 'net-net' bargain Graham's enterprising bar sets
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 56
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 56
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 52
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 51
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 45
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 36
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 36
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 26
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 15
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 286 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 9 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
12.7%
Operating Margin
8.7%
Net Margin
5.9%
EBITDA Margin
11.2%
ROE
29.4%
ROA
10.5%
ROIC
—
EPS
$4.56
Cash
$640.24M
Total Debt
$924.00K
Current Ratio
1.47
Debt/Equity
0.00
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 20.8.2025 | $2.100 |
| 19.8.2025 | $2.100 |
| 3.4.2025 | $6.300 |
| 2.4.2025 | $6.300 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$27.27
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$45.33
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+66.2%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
1.9%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.9% | $665.84M | $610.86M |
| 2 | 2.1% | $679.70M | $572.09M |
| 3 | 2.2% | $694.80M | $536.51M |
| 4 | 2.4% | $711.20M | $503.83M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $728.98M | $473.79M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$653.15M
Terminal Value
$11.50B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$7.47B
Enterprise Value
$10.17B
Net Debt
$-639.31M
Equity Value
$10.81B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$15.43
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$6.33
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 7 positive, 9 neutral, 4 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 29.9.2026
Yahoo · 28.9.2026
Yahoo · 25.9.2026
Yahoo · 23.9.2026
Benzinga · 23.9.2026
Yahoo · 22.9.2026
Yahoo · 22.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
MT Newswires · 4.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
StockStory · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
StockStory · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 29.8.2026
Yahoo · 28.8.2026
Zacks · 28.8.2026
Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (PPC) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 47/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
PPC currently scores 47/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, PPC's estimated fair value is $45.33, which is 66.2% above the current price of $27.27. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
PPC's technical score is 16/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $45.33 vs. price $27.27 (+66.2%); Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Return on equity (ROE): 29.4% — strong.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 0.14 (3y annualized return 7.6% / max drawdown 52.9%); Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -0.7%; Free cash flow growth: -57.4%.
Yes — PPC has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 2 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Padilla Raul | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.4.2026 | 1,927 | +1,927 | — |
| vasconcellos wallim cruz de jr | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.4.2026 | 1,927 | +1,927 | — |
| Batista Joesley Mendonca | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.4.2026 | 1,927 | +1,927 | — |
| Tomazoni Gilberto | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.4.2026 | 1,927 | +1,927 | — |
| Celis Arquimedes | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.4.2026 | 1,927 | +1,927 | — |
| Andre Nogueira de Souza | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.4.2026 | 1,927 | +1,927 | — |
| Maestri Karoleski Joanita Maria | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.4.2026 | 1,927 | +1,927 | — |
| Batista Wesley Mendonca | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.4.2026 | 1,927 | +1,927 | — |
| Aslam Farha | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.4.2026 | 1,927 | +1,927 | — |
| Batista Joesley Mendonca | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.4.2026 | 4,723 | +1,927 | — |
| Batista Wesley Mendonca | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.4.2026 | 4,723 | +1,927 | — |
| Padilla Raul | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.4.2026 | 9,758 | +1,927 | — |
| Tomazoni Gilberto | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.4.2026 | 4,723 | +1,927 | — |
| Andre Nogueira de Souza | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.4.2026 | 4,723 | +1,927 | — |
| vasconcellos wallim cruz de jr | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.4.2026 | 19,935 | +1,927 | — |
| Celis Arquimedes | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.4.2026 | 17,149 | +1,927 | — |
| Aslam Farha | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.4.2026 | 17,149 | +1,927 | — |
| Maestri Karoleski Joanita Maria | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.4.2026 | 10,493 | +1,927 | — |
| Galvanoni Matthew R | Open Market Sale | 18.2.2026 | 6,963 | -6,963 | $43.52 |
| Galvanoni Matthew R | Open Market Sale | 18.2.2026 | 91,397 | -6,963 | $43.52 |
| Galvanoni Matthew R | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 17.2.2026 | 1,972 | -1,972 | — |
| Galvanoni Matthew R | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 17.2.2026 | 1,637 | -1,637 | — |
| Galvanoni Matthew R | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 17.2.2026 | 1,972 | +1,972 | — |
| Galvanoni Matthew R | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 17.2.2026 | 1,637 | +1,637 | — |
| Sandri Fabio | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 17.2.2026 | 3,794 | -3,794 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
6,385,512 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 7,176,146 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
63.3% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 75.8% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology