Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
$14.05
▲ $0.15 (+1.1%)
Market data updated: 09/30 12:24 AM
News analyzed: 09/30/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$13.92 - $14.16
52-Week Range
$13.73 - $19.96
Beta
—
Next Earnings
03.03.2027
Support
$13.73
Resistance
$16.33
-28.8% (1Y)
⚠️ Insufficient data for a reliable StockIQ Score
Only 3 of 7 categories available — Fundamental, Growth, Valuation, Quality unavailable.
Strengths: 1/13 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 1.7% of price
Risk
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: -0.18 (3y annualized return -6.0% / max drawdown 33.5%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
23
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
12
Risk
50
Sentiment
38
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
100
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund focuses primarily on its monthly dividend distributions and market performance analysis. Reports detail its declaration of a $0.2
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund. News trend score: 38. Reason: 5 of the last 20 articles are negative, versus 3 positive.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
21
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
54
Fundamentals
—
Technical
12
Valuation
—
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
-16%
Market Narrative
34
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
-16
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests anchoring and loss aversion are the most active biases, with traders closely monitoring the 2.9% support level. Herding remains dominant due to the stock’s slight outperformance today, but the lack of extreme momentum or sentiment keeps euphoria or panic muted. The key question is whether the stock can sustain its marginal lead or if the 3-month underperformance will trigger deeper selling. Narrative and reality alignment (gap: 0) implies no hidden catalysts, leaving technical support as the primary focus.
Updated: 09/07/2026, 05:53 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"PIMCO closed-end funds declared monthly distribution for common shares"
"Turning $930,000 into a lifetime income stream: annuity payout vs. dividend yield comparison"
"PIMCO closed-end funds declared monthly common share distributions"
📈 4D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 32/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on the documented principles, the model estimates that investors focused on cycle positioning, quiet compounding and disciplined risk‑reward—such as Nelson, Smith, Mackay, Housel, Veblen, Schwager and Marks‑cycle—assign high scores (75‑100) because they see the stock as favorably placed in a non‑overbought part of its cycle and showing real value creation. Mid‑range scores from Loeb, Marks (general), and the efficient‑market view reflect moderate risk and mixed expectations, indicating that while the business appears solid, capital is at risk and the case for out‑performance over an index is not compelling. The classic fundamentalists—Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Bagehot and Graham‑Enterprising—all receive neutral 50 scores, not because of a negative view but because the required balance‑sheet, growth and valuation data are insufficient for a full read. Livermore’s low score of 29 stems from his trend‑following rule, which flags a negative price trend as a clear contrarian signal.
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 100
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 93
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 93
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 81
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 80
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 77
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 76
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟢 66
A real, well-supported case — deviating from a broad index may be justified here
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 61
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 32
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 288 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 10 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 11.9.2026 | $0.221 |
| 13.8.2026 | $0.221 |
| 13.7.2026 | $0.221 |
| 12.7.2026 | $0.221 |
| 11.6.2026 | $0.221 |
| 10.6.2026 | $0.221 |
| 11.5.2026 | $0.221 |
| 10.5.2026 | $0.221 |
| 13.4.2026 | $0.221 |
| 12.4.2026 | $0.221 |
| 12.3.2026 | $0.221 |
| 11.3.2026 | $0.221 |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 3 positive, 12 neutral, 5 negative out of the last 20 articles.
24/7 Wall St. · 27.9.2026
Yahoo · 27.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 24.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 22.9.2026
Yahoo · 22.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 19.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
GuruFocus.com · 11.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 10.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 5.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 5.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 4.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund (PDI) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for PDI specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
PDI's technical score is 12/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 1.7% of price.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: -0.18 (3y annualized return -6.0% / max drawdown 33.5%); Price is below the 50-day average; Price is below the 200-day average.
Yes — PDI has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 10 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 22 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rappaport Alan | Open Market Purchase | 24.9.2026 | 5,500 | +5,500 | $13.76 |
| Morris Sonya | Open Market Purchase | 22.9.2026 | 5,700 | +5,700 | $14.02 |
| Morris Sonya | Open Market Purchase | 22.9.2026 | 5,700 | +5,700 | $14.02 |
| STRACKE THIBAULT CHRISTIAN | Open Market Purchase | 15.7.2026 | 100,000 | +100,000 | $16.40 |
| STRACKE THIBAULT CHRISTIAN | Open Market Purchase | 15.7.2026 | 179,512 | +100,000 | $16.40 |
| FISHER DAVID NICHOLS III | Open Market Purchase | 22.3.2023 | 7,376 | +7,376 | $18.18 |
| STRACKE THIBAULT CHRISTIAN | Open Market Purchase | 21.12.2022 | 6,000 | +6,000 | $18.98 |
| STRACKE THIBAULT CHRISTIAN | Open Market Purchase | 18.5.2022 | 7,500 | +7,500 | $21.34 |
| STRACKE THIBAULT CHRISTIAN | Open Market Purchase | 11.3.2022 | 6,000 | +6,000 | $22.78 |
| STRACKE THIBAULT CHRISTIAN | Open Market Purchase | 7.2.2022 | 6,000 | +6,000 | $25.14 |
| NAGLER JASON JORDAN | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.12.2021 | 817 | +817 | — |
| Schneider Jerome M | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.12.2021 | 2,068 | +2,068 | — |
| MANEY JOHN C | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.12.2021 | 5,831 | +5,831 | — |
| Rappaport Alan | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.12.2021 | 949 | +949 | — |
| MURATA ALFRED T | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.12.2021 | 37,651 | +37,651 | — |
| IVASCYN DANIEL J | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.12.2021 | 51,786 | +51,786 | — |
| STRACKE THIBAULT CHRISTIAN | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.12.2021 | 34,577 | +34,577 | — |
| Rappaport Alan | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.12.2021 | 2,864 | +2,864 | — |
| MURATA ALFRED T | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.12.2021 | 3,274 | +3,274 | — |
| IVASCYN DANIEL J | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.12.2021 | 145,990 | +145,990 | — |
| SEIDNER MARC P | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.12.2021 | 68,094 | +68,094 | — |
| Roman Emmanuel | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.12.2021 | 77,758 | +77,758 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
731,638 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 534,100 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
25.7% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 31.4% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology