Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· ·
$21.93
▲ $0.23 (+1.1%)
Market data updated: 09/16 05:25 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/16/2026
News analyzed: 09/16/2026
Market Cap
$2.23B
Day Range
$21.60 - $22.11
52-Week Range
$19.06 - $29.25
Beta
—
Next Earnings
27.10.2026
+1.1% (1Y)
Strengths: 7/28 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is stable or improving over time
Quality
Biggest negative driver
Net income growth
Net income growth: -1.7%
Growth
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
49
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
48
Quality
63
Value
50
Momentum
9
Risk
62
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
64
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited highlights its strong financial performance and market optimism. The company’s Q2 2026 earnings call emphasized record demand for its cruise spa services, driving robust revenue growth. Analysts from Stifel and Truist raised their price targets to $32 and $29, respectively, while maintaining a "Buy" rating. Technical analysts noted its favorable growth and balance sheet, though valuation remains high. Some investors, like the Madison Small Cap Fund, exited their OSW holdings in Q2.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited - Common. News trend score: 100. Reason: 10 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
29
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
55
Fundamentals
64
Technical
9
Valuation
50
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
-20%
Market Narrative
53
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+11
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for OSW is dominated by **panic selling**, evidenced by extreme volume, volatility, and sentiment despite oversold conditions. The narrative gap (53 vs. 42) hints at a disconnect where optimism persists despite observable declines. The key question is whether the extreme sentiment (100/100) reflects last-ditch buying or a delayed reaction to deteriorating fundamentals. The absence of herding or anchoring suggests this is a reactive, not systematic, sell-off. Without a catalyst, the oversold RSI (25) could signal exhaustion—but only if volume and volatility stabilize.
Updated: 09/07/2026, 04:34 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"OneSpaWorld Keeps Turning Cruise Demand Into Record Earnings"
"Truist lifts price target on OneSpaWorld Holdings to $29 from $28"
"Is OneSpaWorld Holdings (OSW) Undervalued After Earnings Guidance And Dividend News?"
"Stifel maintains OneSpaWorld Hldgs with a Buy rating"
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 95/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 23/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The methodologies for OSW split sharply between bullish and cautious camps, with some investors seeing strong technical or cyclical tailwinds while others flagged fundamental or structural weaknesses. Samuel Armstrong Nelson’s near-perfect score and favorable cycle positioning contrast sharply with Jesse Livermore’s outright rejection, as Livermore’s trend-following discipline clashes with Nelson’s mean-reversion approach. Meanwhile, the 'buy-and-hold' crowd—like Edgar Lawrence Smith and Jack Schwager—praises the stock’s long-term potential and risk-reward balance, while Philip Fisher and Benjamin Graham dismiss it outright for lacking their signature qualities of growth or defensive value. The middle ground, represented by Howard Marks and Walter Bagehot, acknowledges moderate appeal but warns against overconfidence, highlighting how even methodologically aligned investors (like Marks’ cycle and risk assessments) can arrive at nuanced but still cautious conclusions.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 95
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 78
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 76
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 76
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 67
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 63
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 62
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 61
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 50
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 43
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 43
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 40
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 39
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 32
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 23
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 278 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 11 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
8.5%
Net Margin
7.5%
EBITDA Margin
11.1%
ROE
13.2%
ROA
10.1%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.69
Cash
$16.31M
Total Debt
$83.97M
Current Ratio
1.91
Debt/Equity
0.15
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 19.8.2026 | $0.050 |
| 20.5.2026 | $0.050 |
| 19.5.2026 | $0.050 |
| 11.3.2026 | $0.050 |
| 10.3.2026 | $0.050 |
| 19.11.2025 | $0.050 |
| 18.11.2025 | $0.050 |
| 20.8.2025 | $0.040 |
| 19.8.2025 | $0.040 |
| 21.5.2025 | $0.040 |
| 20.5.2025 | $0.040 |
| 12.3.2025 | $0.040 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$5.23
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$0.30
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 10 positive, 9 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
MarketBeat · 22.8.2026
MarketBeat · 16.8.2026
ChartMill · 12.8.2026
Motley Fool · 8.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 5.8.2026
Moby · 30.7.2026
MT Newswires · 30.7.2026
Benzinga · 30.7.2026
Benzinga · 30.7.2026
Simply Wall St. · 30.7.2026
GuruFocus.com · 29.7.2026
MarketBeat · 29.7.2026
SeekingAlpha · 29.7.2026
Zacks · 29.7.2026
MT Newswires · 29.7.2026
Associated Press · 29.7.2026
Business Wire · 29.7.2026
ChartMill · 29.7.2026
Benzinga · 29.7.2026
Benzinga · 29.7.2026
OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited - Common (OSW) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 49/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
OSW currently scores 49/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
OSW's technical score is 9/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Debt/equity: 0.15; Current ratio: 1.91.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Net income growth: -1.7%; Price is below the 50-day average; Price is below the 200-day average.
Yes — OSW has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 8 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HEYER ANDREW R | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 4,781 | -4,781 | $26.07 |
| HEYER ANDREW R | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 302,145 | -4,781 | $26.07 |
| HEYER ANDREW R | Open Market Sale | 7.8.2026 | 25,219 | -25,219 | $26.42 |
| HEYER ANDREW R | Open Market Sale | 7.8.2026 | 306,926 | -25,219 | $26.42 |
| HEYER ANDREW R | Open Market Sale | 6.8.2026 | 20,000 | -20,000 | $26.45 |
| HEYER ANDREW R | Open Market Sale | 6.8.2026 | 10,000 | -10,000 | $26.40 |
| HEYER ANDREW R | Open Market Sale | 6.8.2026 | 478,099 | -20,000 | $26.45 |
| HEYER ANDREW R | Open Market Sale | 6.8.2026 | 90,000 | -10,000 | $26.40 |
| Magliacano Marc | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.7.2026 | 7,993 | +7,993 | — |
| HEYER ANDREW R | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.7.2026 | 8,282 | +8,282 | — |
| STIEFLER JEFFREY E | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.7.2026 | 8,956 | +8,956 | — |
| Banikarim Maryam | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.7.2026 | 4,815 | +4,815 | — |
| Hasiba Adam | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.7.2026 | 4,815 | +4,815 | — |
| FUSFIELD GLENN | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.7.2026 | 4,815 | +4,815 | — |
| Myers Lisa | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.7.2026 | 4,815 | +4,815 | — |
| POWELL STEPHEN W. | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.7.2026 | 10,882 | +10,882 | — |
| McLallen Walter Field | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.7.2026 | 4,815 | +4,815 | — |
| FUSFIELD GLENN | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.7.2026 | 60,302 | +4,815 | — |
| STIEFLER JEFFREY E | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.7.2026 | 128,544 | +8,956 | — |
| HEYER ANDREW R | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.7.2026 | 498,099 | +8,282 | — |
| Banikarim Maryam | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.7.2026 | 93,540 | +4,815 | — |
| McLallen Walter Field | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.7.2026 | 142,197 | +4,815 | — |
| POWELL STEPHEN W. | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.7.2026 | 144,353 | +10,882 | — |
| Myers Lisa | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.7.2026 | 26,179 | +4,815 | — |
| Magliacano Marc | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.7.2026 | 29,505 | +7,993 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
6,431,522 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 5,128,812 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
78.6% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 65.4% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology