Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
$4.10
▲ $0.00 (+0.0%)
Market data updated: 09/30 08:23 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/30/2026
News analyzed: 09/30/2026
Market Cap
$184.71M
Day Range
$4.03 - $4.11
52-Week Range
$3.88 - $10.38
Beta
—
Next Earnings
09.11.2026
Support
$3.99
Resistance
$6.10
-57.8% (1Y)
Strengths: 6/24 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 50.4%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Net margin
Net margin: -103.1% (negative)
Fundamental
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
47
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
68
Quality
55
Value
50
Momentum
15
Risk
40
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
38
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Octave Specialty Group, Inc. has centered on its Q2 2026 earnings performance, where the company reported a net loss despite revenue exceeding analyst estimates due to growth in distribution and management general agent (MGA) operations. Analysts noted mixed guidance, with some optimism about MGA expansion but cautious expectations on profitability. The focus also included discussions of oversold financial stocks and OSG’s potential as an undervalued opportunity, though no broader strategic shifts or major announcements beyond earnings were highlighted.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Octave Specialty Group, Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 11 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
31
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
40
Psychology
83
Fundamentals
38
Technical
15
Valuation
50
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
-36%
Market Narrative
53
Fundamental Reality
40
Narrative Gap
+13
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant FOMO (46) reflects a market primed by strong momentum (+9.5% ROC), elevated volume (1.24x), and perfect news sentiment (100/100). This suggests traders are chasing gains, despite the stock still trading 6.6% below its 200-day average—a classic FOMO trigger. Overconfidence (22) aligns with price outpacing fundamentals, while the 35-point narrative gap hints at a disconnect between optimism and underlying valuation. The key question: will the momentum sustain, or will the gap between narrative and reality widen further?
Updated: 09/07/2026, 11:29 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"reported quarterly losses of $(0.04) per share which missed the analyst consensus estimate of $(0.01) by Infinity percent"
"Sales $82.995M Beat $70.890M Estimate"
"Q2 Earnings Call Focuses on MGA Growth"
"beats Q2 revenue estimates but posts wider adjusted loss"
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Benjamin Graham — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Philip Fisher — 15/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock divides methodologies sharply, with Graham’s defensive and enterprising frameworks both scoring maximally due to their reliance on fundamental valuation data—though both note insufficient data for a full analysis. Meanwhile, Lynch and Schwager see strong growth potential and disciplined setups, scoring well, while Fisher and Nelson flag red flags: Fisher dismisses it for lacking his signature of quality and growth, while Nelson warns of overbought conditions. The middle-ground approaches—Marks, Malkiel/Bogle, and Housel—caution against overconfidence, balancing mixed signals of profitability, market positioning, and cyclical risk, while Bagehot and Veblen’s lower scores reflect uncertainty around balance-sheet strength and growth sustainability.
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 100
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 100
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 100
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 98
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 80
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 78
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 76
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 69
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 63
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 56
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 49
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 45
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 42
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 40
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 19
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 15
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 287 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 10 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
-103.1%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
-36.2%
ROA
-11.7%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$5.93
Cash
$70.09M
Total Debt
$117.56M
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
0.16
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$15.17
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$6.35
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 11 positive, 8 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 29.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.8.2026
Business Wire · 14.8.2026
Motley Fool · 13.8.2026
Zacks · 10.8.2026
Zacks · 10.8.2026
MarketBeat · 9.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 7.8.2026
Zacks · 6.8.2026
Associated Press · 6.8.2026
Business Wire · 6.8.2026
ChartMill · 6.8.2026
Benzinga · 6.8.2026
Zacks · 5.8.2026
Zacks · 5.8.2026
Zacks · 3.8.2026
Business Wire · 3.8.2026
Business Wire · 17.7.2026
Zacks · 29.6.2026
Zacks · 16.6.2026
Octave Specialty Group, Inc. (OSG) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 47/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
OSG currently scores 47/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
OSG's technical score is 15/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 50.4%; Net income growth: 53.4%; Debt/equity: 0.16.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Net margin: -103.1% (negative); ATR: 4.8% of price; Calmar: -0.39 (3y annualized return -30.4% / max drawdown 78.5%).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for OSG.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trick David | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.7.2026 | 13,206 | +13,206 | — |
| Smith R Sharon | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.7.2026 | 11,779 | +11,779 | — |
| Trick David | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.7.2026 | 13,206 | -13,206 | — |
| Smith R Sharon | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.7.2026 | 11,779 | +11,779 | — |
| Trick David | Tax Withholding in Shares | 9.7.2026 | 6,741 | -6,741 | $6.08 |
| Smith R Sharon | Tax Withholding in Shares | 9.7.2026 | 4,635 | -4,635 | $6.08 |
| LeBlanc Claude | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.7.2026 | 39,380 | +39,380 | — |
| LeBlanc Claude | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.7.2026 | 39,380 | -39,380 | — |
| LeBlanc Claude | Tax Withholding in Shares | 9.7.2026 | 21,777 | -21,777 | $6.08 |
| LeBlanc Claude | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.7.2026 | 1,087,011 | +39,380 | — |
| LeBlanc Claude | Tax Withholding in Shares | 9.7.2026 | 1,065,234 | -21,777 | $6.08 |
| LeBlanc Claude | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.7.2026 | 480,832 | -39,380 | — |
| Trick David | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.7.2026 | 273,837 | +13,206 | — |
| Trick David | Tax Withholding in Shares | 9.7.2026 | 267,096 | -6,741 | $6.08 |
| Trick David | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.7.2026 | 124,978 | -13,206 | — |
| Smith R Sharon | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.7.2026 | 160,961 | +11,779 | — |
| Smith R Sharon | Tax Withholding in Shares | 9.7.2026 | 156,326 | -4,635 | $6.08 |
| Smith R Sharon | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.7.2026 | 132,093 | +11,779 | — |
| PRICE MICHAEL D | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 6,500 | +6,500 | — |
| IGLESIAS LISA G | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 6,500 | +6,500 | — |
| LAMMTENNANT JOAN M | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 6,500 | +6,500 | — |
| Stein Jeffrey Scott | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 6,500 | +6,500 | — |
| Matus Kristi Ann | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 6,500 | +6,500 | — |
| HAFT IAN DAVID | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 6,500 | +6,500 | — |
| IGLESIAS LISA G | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 22,591 | +6,500 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,736,370 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 1,729,047 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
50.3% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 42.7% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology