Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$17.94
▼ $0.12 (-0.7%)
Market data updated: 09/23 12:20 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/22/2026
News analyzed: 09/23/2026
Market Cap
$1.61B
Day Range
$17.85 - $18.34
52-Week Range
$11.71 - $21.06
Beta
—
Next Earnings
27.10.2026
Support
$17.35
Resistance
$20.78
OPRA is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
-3.6% (1Y)
Strengths: 14/31 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $30.21 vs. price $17.94 (+68.4%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 0.26 (3y annualized return 11.9% / max drawdown 46.1%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
57
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
82
Quality
63
Value
62
Momentum
26
Risk
54
Sentiment
50
Fundamental
75
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Opera Limited has primarily centered on its legal and financial developments. Notably, the company lost an EU antitrust challenge, with an EU court upholding Microsoft’s exemption from Digital Markets Act gatekeeper rules for Edge, reversing Opera’s earlier role in a €561 million Microsoft fine. Additionally, Opera’s forward-moved earnings report highlighted strong AI-driven growth, with Q1 revenue and adjusted EBITDA rising sharply, sparking investor speculation about further guidance increases. The company also announced CFO participation in upcoming investor conferences.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Opera Limited. News trend score: 50. Reason: The mix of positive and negative articles is balanced — 7 vs. 7 out of the last 20 articles.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
9
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
14
Fundamentals
75
Technical
26
Valuation
62
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
-1%
Market Narrative
30
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
-12
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
OPRA’s psychology is fragmented, with euphoria (11) and FOMO (13) dominating despite a 38% DCF discount. The narrative gap (6) hints at a disconnect between optimism and valuation fundamentals. Overconfidence (5) may stem from momentum decoupling from earnings growth, while neutral RSI and low volatility dampen panic or loss aversion. The key question: *Is the rally driven by fundamentals or speculative momentum?*
Updated: 09/07/2026, 04:53 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Opera lost its antitrust challenge against Microsoft as an EU court upheld Edge’s exemption from Digital Markets Act gatekeeper rules."
"First-quarter revenue rose 23% to $175.8 million, while adjusted EBITDA increased 30% to $42.0 million. Both exceeded the company’s guidance."
📈 5D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 96/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 39/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide between growth-focused and more conservative methodologies. Peter Lynch and Edgar Lawrence Smith, both drawn to long-term growth potential, rate it near the top (96 and 94), seeing it as a prime 'buy and hold' candidate where the price hasn’t yet reflected its underlying momentum. Meanwhile, value-oriented investors like Benjamin Graham (Defensive) and Philip Fisher still show strong interest (82 and 87), praising its quality and defensive resilience, though not at the same euphoric level. At the other end, traders like Jesse Livermore (43) and Jack Schwager (40) dismiss it outright, flagging a negative trend or lack of clear directional edge, while cycle-sensitive analysts like Howard Marks (Market Cycle) at 48 see it as mid-cycle—neither overbought nor oversold. The contrast highlights how growth hunters and value seekers overlap in enthusiasm, while technical and cyclical approaches remain skeptical, splitting the debate between conviction and caution.
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 96
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 94
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 90
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 88
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 87
Exceptional company quality by Fisher's standards
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 85
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 78
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 72
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 72
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟢 71
A real, well-supported case — deviating from a broad index may be justified here
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 66
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 63
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 62
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 53
Some discount, but not the deep 'net-net' bargain Graham's enterprising bar sets
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 53
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 39
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 281 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 8 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
64.1%
Operating Margin
14.7%
Net Margin
17.6%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
10.7%
ROA
9.5%
ROIC
—
EPS
$1.21
Cash
$155.47M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
2.35
Debt/Equity
0.01
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 7.7.2026 | $0.400 |
| 6.7.2026 | $0.400 |
| 7.1.2026 | $0.400 |
| 6.1.2026 | $0.400 |
| 8.7.2025 | $0.400 |
| 7.7.2025 | $0.400 |
| 6.1.2025 | $0.400 |
| 5.1.2025 | $0.400 |
| 2.7.2024 | $0.400 |
| 1.7.2024 | $0.400 |
| 2.1.2024 | $0.400 |
| 1.1.2024 | $0.400 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$17.94
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$30.21
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+68.4%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
23.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 23.0% | $137.95M | $126.56M |
| 2 | 17.9% | $162.58M | $136.84M |
| 3 | 12.7% | $183.29M | $141.53M |
| 4 | 7.6% | $197.25M | $139.73M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $202.18M | $131.40M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$112.18M
Terminal Value
$3.19B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$2.07B
Enterprise Value
$2.75B
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$2.75B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$11.27
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$10.17
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 7 positive, 6 neutral, 7 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 10.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
MT Newswires · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
MT Newswires · 8.9.2026
MT Newswires · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
MT Newswires · 2.9.2026
MT Newswires · 2.9.2026
Benzinga · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 31.8.2026
MT Newswires · 31.8.2026
Yahoo · 26.8.2026
Opera Limited (OPRA) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 57/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
OPRA currently scores 57/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, OPRA's estimated fair value is $30.21, which is 68.4% above the current price of $17.94. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
OPRA's technical score is 26/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $30.21 vs. price $17.94 (+68.4%); Revenue growth (last year): 27.9%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 32.2%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 0.26 (3y annualized return 11.9% / max drawdown 46.1%); Price is below the 50-day average; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum.
Yes — OPRA has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 8 sales out of the last 17 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liu James Jian | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.8.2026 | 4,079 | +4,079 | — |
| Naess Lori Wheeler | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.8.2026 | 4,909 | +4,079 | — |
| Riiber Knudsen Trond | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.8.2026 | 5,329 | +4,079 | — |
| Riiber Knudsen Trond | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.8.2026 | 4,079 | +4,079 | — |
| Liu James Jian | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.8.2026 | 4,079 | +4,079 | — |
| Naess Lori Wheeler | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.8.2026 | 4,079 | +4,079 | — |
| Zhou Yahui | Other Transaction | 26.6.2026 | 665,995 | -665,995 | $16.01 |
| Jacobsen Frode | Open Market Sale | 18.6.2026 | 44,400 | -44,400 | $18.52 |
| Song Lin | Open Market Sale | 18.6.2026 | 44,400 | -44,400 | $18.52 |
| Song Lin | Open Market Sale | 18.6.2026 | 120,846 | -44,400 | $18.52 |
| Jacobsen Frode | Open Market Sale | 18.6.2026 | 43,325 | -44,400 | $18.52 |
| Song Lin | Open Market Sale | 17.6.2026 | 25,600 | -25,600 | $18.88 |
| Jacobsen Frode | Open Market Sale | 17.6.2026 | 25,600 | -25,600 | $18.88 |
| Song Lin | Open Market Sale | 17.6.2026 | 165,246 | -25,600 | $18.88 |
| Jacobsen Frode | Open Market Sale | 17.6.2026 | 87,725 | -25,600 | $18.88 |
| Zhou Yahui | Other Transaction | 26.3.2026 | 485,874 | -485,874 | $15.21 |
| Zhou Yahui | Other Transaction | 26.3.2026 | 54,347,459 | -485,874 | $15.21 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,655,423 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 1,463,727 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
42.7% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 43.8% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology