Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· ·
$20.13
▼ $0.61 (-2.9%)
Market data updated: 09/25 10:38 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/25/2026
News analyzed: 09/25/2026
Market Cap
$1.46B
Day Range
$20.11 - $20.62
52-Week Range
$4.06 - $21.24
Beta
—
Next Earnings
11.11.2026
Support
$9.12
Resistance
$20.97
+370.3% (1Y)
Strengths: 16/29 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 98.1%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$35.35 vs. price $20.13 (-275.6%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (74/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (38/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
62
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
74
Quality
58
Value
38
Momentum
76
Risk
42
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
43
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Omeros Corporation has centered on its stock performance and investor activity. The company saw significant price surges, including a gap-up to a five-year high, alongside technical signals like a "golden cross" indicating potential upward momentum. Analysts discussed its profitability and valuation, while insider share sales totaling over $1.5 million in recent weeks drew attention. Earnings call insights and momentum-driven buying recommendations also shaped the narrative.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Omeros Corporation. News trend score: 100. Reason: 16 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
49
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
52
Psychology
55
Fundamentals
43
Technical
76
Valuation
38
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
+132%
Market Narrative
71
Fundamental Reality
52
Narrative Gap
+19
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
OMER’s psychology is dominated by euphoria (58), consistent with extreme overperformance (+55.9% above 200-day average) and perfect sentiment. FOMO (33) and anchoring (26) reinforce this, as traders chase momentum and resist pullbacks near resistance. The narrative-reality gap (16) hints at detached optimism, while overconfidence (5) is subtle—price outpacing fundamentals. The key question: *Will traders sustain euphoria despite overbought conditions, or will anchoring near resistance trigger rebalancing?*
Updated: 09/06/2026, 10:34 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Omeros Insider Sold Shares Worth $929,668"
"Omeros Swings to Q2 Adjusted Earnings; Shares up"
"Omeros Corp (NASDAQ: OMER) ... moving higher"
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 73/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 8/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock splits the historical methodologies into two starkly different camps: a handful of growth-oriented investors see potential, while the majority flag serious red flags. Peter Lynch’s high score and 'growth candidate' verdict suggest he’d focus on the stock’s upside potential, assuming the price hasn’t yet reflected its true earnings growth. Meanwhile, Fisher and Veblen—while not dismissing it outright—raise doubts about quality and profit sustainability, respectively. The rest of the methodologies, from the cautious Graham to the outright skeptical Mackay and Nelson, converge on concerns about valuation, risk, volatility, and market timing, with many warning of overvaluation or late-cycle dangers. The contrast highlights a fundamental tension: whether the stock’s growth narrative justifies the risks or if it’s a speculative bubble ripe for correction.
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 73
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 64
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 60
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 56
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 55
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 52
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 48
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 44
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 32
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 31
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 30
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 30
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 29
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🔴 24
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 17
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 8
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 285 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (8 bullish · 2 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
98.8%
Operating Margin
-168.0%
Net Margin
-187.1%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
55.3%
ROA
-56.7%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$0.05
Cash
$9.66M
Total Debt
$87.90M
Current Ratio
2.76
Debt/Equity
5.16
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$20.13
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$35.35
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-275.6%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
10.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.0% | $-127.77M | $-117.22M |
| 2 | 8.1% | $-138.16M | $-116.28M |
| 3 | 6.3% | $-146.79M | $-113.35M |
| 4 | 4.4% | $-153.21M | $-108.54M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-157.04M | $-102.07M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-116.16M
Terminal Value
$-2.48B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-1.61B
Enterprise Value
$-2.17B
Net Debt
$78.24M
Equity Value
$-2.25B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$1.36
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$2.03
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 16 positive, 4 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 23.9.2026
Yahoo · 22.9.2026
Yahoo · 22.9.2026
Benzinga · 22.9.2026
Benzinga · 22.9.2026
Benzinga · 22.9.2026
Benzinga · 22.9.2026
MT Newswires · 1.9.2026
MT Newswires · 28.8.2026
Zacks · 28.8.2026
Zacks · 25.8.2026
MT Newswires · 21.8.2026
Motley Fool · 20.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 14.8.2026
Investor's Business Daily · 13.8.2026
ChartMill · 13.8.2026
ChartMill · 13.8.2026
Benzinga · 13.8.2026
MT Newswires · 13.8.2026
Benzinga · 13.8.2026
Omeros Corporation (OMER) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 62/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
OMER currently scores 62/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, OMER's estimated fair value is -$35.35, which is 275.6% below the current price of $20.13. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
OMER's technical score is 76/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 98.1%; Free cash flow growth: 22.0%; Net income growth: 97.9%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$35.35 vs. price $20.13 (-275.6%); Operating margin: -168.0% (negative); Net margin: -187.1% (negative).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for OMER.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 9 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cancelmo Peter B | Open Market Sale | 31.8.2026 | 200 | -25,000 | $18.54 |
| Cancelmo Peter B | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 31.8.2026 | 25,200 | +25,000 | $2.94 |
| Cancelmo Peter B | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 31.8.2026 | 50,000 | -25,000 | — |
| Cancelmo Peter B | Open Market Sale | 31.8.2026 | 25,000 | -25,000 | $18.54 |
| Cancelmo Peter B | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 31.8.2026 | 25,000 | -25,000 | — |
| Cancelmo Peter B | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 31.8.2026 | 25,000 | +25,000 | $2.94 |
| Cancelmo Peter B | Open Market Sale | 28.8.2026 | 200 | -25,000 | $18.65 |
| Cancelmo Peter B | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 28.8.2026 | 25,200 | +25,000 | $2.94 |
| Cancelmo Peter B | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 28.8.2026 | 75,000 | -25,000 | — |
| Cancelmo Peter B | Open Market Sale | 28.8.2026 | 25,000 | -25,000 | $18.65 |
| Cancelmo Peter B | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 28.8.2026 | 25,000 | +25,000 | $2.94 |
| Cancelmo Peter B | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 28.8.2026 | 25,000 | -25,000 | — |
| HANISH ARNOLD C | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 5,000 | -5,000 | $19.02 |
| HANISH ARNOLD C | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 27.8.2026 | 7,500 | +7,500 | $14.66 |
| HANISH ARNOLD C | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 27.8.2026 | 2,500 | +2,500 | $15.81 |
| HANISH ARNOLD C | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 27.8.2026 | 2,500 | -2,500 | — |
| HANISH ARNOLD C | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 27.8.2026 | 7,500 | -7,500 | — |
| HANISH ARNOLD C | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 5,000 | -5,000 | $18.88 |
| HANISH ARNOLD C | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 27.8.2026 | 2,500 | +2,500 | $15.81 |
| HANISH ARNOLD C | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 5,000 | -5,000 | $18.88 |
| HANISH ARNOLD C | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 27.8.2026 | 10,000 | +7,500 | $14.66 |
| HANISH ARNOLD C | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 0 | -5,000 | $19.02 |
| HANISH ARNOLD C | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 27.8.2026 | 0 | -2,500 | — |
| HANISH ARNOLD C | Open Market Sale | 26.8.2026 | 5,000 | -5,000 | $18.53 |
| HANISH ARNOLD C | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 26.8.2026 | 5,000 | +5,000 | $15.81 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
12,491,576 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 12,758,406 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
52.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 39.0% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology