Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
$18.57
▼ $0.10 (-0.5%)
Market data updated: 09/23 11:03 AM
News analyzed: 09/23/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$18.47 - $18.92
52-Week Range
$13.56 - $19.42
Beta
—
Next Earnings
30.10.2026
Support
$17.22
Resistance
$19.42
+36.4% (1Y)
🟡 Moderate
Strengths: 10/14 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟢 Bullish
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 1.9% of price
Risk
Biggest negative driver
Stochastic
%K 88.0 — overbought
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
71
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
85
Risk
58
Sentiment
44
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of NatWest Group plc has centered on its strategic expansion into the U.S. market, including approval for a Connecticut office to rebuild international presence amid heightened UK banking competition. The bank has also seen positive earnings momentum, with improving deposit margins and a 20%+ return on tangible equity highlighted in Q2 2026 results. Additionally, there was brief mention of its role in facilitating Amazon’s debut Sterling bond sale.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about NatWest Group plc American Depositary Shares (each representing two (2) Ordinary Shares). News trend score: 44. Reason: 7 of the last 20 articles are negative, versus 6 positive.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
17
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
50
Fundamentals
—
Technical
85
Valuation
—
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
+10%
Market Narrative
44
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
-6
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
NWG’s psychology score of 33 reflects a narrative-reality gap (40 vs. 50) where traders appear anchored to resistance at 3.3% above current levels, suggesting hesitation rather than decisive action. The lack of dominant bias (FOMO/Panic scores tied at 10) implies a wait-and-see stance, with euphoria muted by neutral sentiment and volatility. Key uncertainty: whether the stock tests resistance or reverts to mean—evidence leans toward test-and-hold behavior. Low herding/overconfidence scores imply no herd mentality, reinforcing individual caution.
Updated: 09/08/2026, 04:48 PM
👥 What the crowd believes
"NatWest Group plc is making a renewed push into the U.S. market more than a decade after the financial crisis forced the bank to retreat from international operations."
"NatWest Group hits 20%+ return on tangible equity as margins expand and credit stays strong."
📈 4D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 79/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 15/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The methodologies for NWG split sharply between those favoring cautious optimism and those flagging uncertainty or outright caution. Morgan Housel and Charles Mackay’s high scores reflect their focus on patient, long-term compounding and the absence of crowd-driven mania, suggesting this stock could align with steady, disciplined growth strategies. Meanwhile, Gerald Loeb and Howard Marks’ mid-range scores indicate a balanced risk-reward profile, though not a high-conviction pick. In contrast, methodologies like Jesse Livermore’s and Jack Schwager’s low scores stem from a lack of clear directional momentum or systematic setups, while Samuel Nelson’s warning about overbought conditions hints at potential cyclical risks. The cluster of 'not enough data' verdicts—from Graham, Fisher, and Lynch—underscores that NWG lacks the granular fundamentals or valuation clarity needed for rigorous bottom-up analysis, leaving its viability dependent on broader macro or qualitative judgments.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 79
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 70
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 67
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 64
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 54
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 51
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 40
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 23
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 15
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 281 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (9 bullish · 1 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 14.8.2026 | $0.322 |
| 20.3.2026 | $0.621 |
| 19.3.2026 | $0.621 |
| 8.8.2025 | $0.255 |
| 7.8.2025 | $0.255 |
| 14.3.2025 | $0.390 |
| 13.3.2025 | $0.390 |
| 9.8.2024 | $0.154 |
| 8.8.2024 | $0.154 |
| 14.3.2024 | $0.290 |
| 13.3.2024 | $0.290 |
| 1.12.2023 | $0.139 |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 6 positive, 7 neutral, 7 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 12.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Bloomberg · 9.9.2026
MT Newswires · 8.9.2026
MT Newswires · 8.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 29.8.2026
Insider Monkey · 29.8.2026
Investing.com · 22.8.2026
Bloomberg · 18.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 10.8.2026
Investing.com · 8.8.2026
Motley Fool · 8.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 5.8.2026
MarketBeat · 31.7.2026
MT Newswires · 31.7.2026
MT Newswires · 31.7.2026
The Wall Street Journal · 31.7.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for NatWest Group plc American Depositary Shares (each representing two (2) Ordinary Shares) (NWG) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for NWG specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
NWG's technical score is 85/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 1.9% of price; Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: %K 88.0 — overbought.
Yes — NWG has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 0 filings.
No recent insider transaction filings found for this stock.
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,357,486 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 1,761,163 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
39.7% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 37.2% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology