Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$116.19
▼ $0.43 (-0.4%)
Market data updated: 09/19 01:54 AM
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$370.89B
Day Range
$116.10 - $117.20
52-Week Range
$106.06 - $156.44
Beta
—
Next Earnings
18.11.2026
Support
$115.21
Resistance
$135.30
NTES is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
-24.0% (1Y)
⚠️ Insufficient data for a reliable StockIQ Score
Only 3 of 7 categories available — Fundamental, Growth, Valuation, Quality unavailable.
Strengths: 0/13 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
No notable strengths identified.
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 0.13 (3y annualized return 4.7% / max drawdown 35.6%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
38
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
13
Risk
42
Sentiment
98
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of NetEase Inc. has centered on its financial performance and investor appeal, particularly after its Q2 2026 earnings report, which highlighted strong revenue growth and improving margins in its gaming segment. Analysts have praised its valuation, suggesting the stock may trade at a 23–38% discount to fair value, while also emphasizing its long-term dividend potential and alignment with growth-at-reasonable-price investment strategies. A notable insider sell by a vice president was also briefly reported.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about NetEase Inc.. News trend score: 98. Reason: 10 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
17
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
83
Fundamentals
—
Technical
13
Valuation
—
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
-4%
Market Narrative
60
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+10
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for NTES suggests a dominant anchoring bias, likely due to the stock’s proximity to support (2.9% away). While panic selling is mildly present (score 15), it’s overshadowed by the clear fixation on a key price level. The narrative gap (-14) hints at a disconnect between investor perceptions and reality, but the data doesn’t reveal whether this stems from over- or underestimation. The key question is whether the anchoring will hold or if a break below support could trigger further behavioral shifts.
Updated: 09/08/2026, 04:25 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Strong Game Revenue Growth and Margin"
"NetEase (SEHK:9999) Could Be 23% Undervalued"
"21% EPS growth, 0.70 PEG, low debt, strong ROE"
"EPADS miss from investment losses"
📈 9D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 89/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 13/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on Smith's documented principles, the model estimates a perfect score but cannot form a real read because of missing dividend and growth data, leaving his view essentially neutral. Based on Mackay's and Nelson's documented principles, the model estimates relatively high scores (76 and 74) reflecting a lack of crowd mania and a favorable cycle position, which leans mildly bullish. Based on Housel's, Marks's, and Loeb's documented principles, the model estimates moderate scores (around 50) indicating the stock is holdable but carries mixed expectations and moderate risk. Based on Graham's, Fisher's, Lynch's, Bagehot's and Graham‑Enterprising's documented principles, the model estimates neutral scores (50) because each methodology requires more balance‑sheet, valuation or growth data before reaching a decisive verdict. Finally, based on Veblen's and Livermore's documented principles, the model estimates low scores (20 and 11) flagging the growth focus as frivolous and the price trend as negative, producing sharply pessimistic conclusions compared to the more neutral or mildly positive views of the other investors.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 89
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 76
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 55
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 53
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 50
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 49
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 48
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 37
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 20
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 13
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 10 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 3.9.2026 | $0.480 |
| 5.6.2026 | $0.720 |
| 4.6.2026 | $0.720 |
| 16.3.2026 | $1.160 |
| 15.3.2026 | $1.160 |
| 5.12.2025 | $0.570 |
| 4.12.2025 | $0.570 |
| 28.8.2025 | $0.570 |
| 27.8.2025 | $0.570 |
| 30.5.2025 | $0.675 |
| 29.5.2025 | $0.675 |
| 6.3.2025 | $1.220 |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 10 positive, 8 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 13.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Forkast News · 10.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 7.9.2026
ChartMill · 5.9.2026
Benzinga · 4.9.2026
ChartMill · 1.9.2026
Yahoo · 27.8.2026
Insider Monkey · 27.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 24.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 22.8.2026
Benzinga · 21.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 21.8.2026
Motley Fool · 21.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 20.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 20.8.2026
MarketBeat · 20.8.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for NetEase Inc. (NTES) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for NTES specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
NTES's technical score is 13/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 0.13 (3y annualized return 4.7% / max drawdown 35.6%); Price is below the 50-day average; Price is below the 200-day average.
Yes — NTES has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 2 sales out of the last 4 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mo Bin | Open Market Sale | 2.9.2026 | 716 | -716 | $120.64 |
| Mo Bin | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 716 | +716 | — |
| Mo Bin | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 716 | +716 | — |
| Boltz Paul William JR | Open Market Sale | 29.6.2026 | 10,000 | -10,000 | $128.30 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
2,662,671 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 2,558,019 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
58.2% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 47.6% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology