Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Industrials · ·
$13.97
▼ $0.42 (-2.9%)
Market data updated: 09/24 03:22 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/24/2026
News analyzed: 09/24/2026
Market Cap
$2.36B
Day Range
$13.93 - $14.35
52-Week Range
$10.87 - $24.42
Beta
—
Next Earnings
04.11.2026
Support
$12.03
Resistance
$19.92
NN is a stock from the Industrials sector — Manufacturing, aerospace, defense, and infrastructure — closely tied to capital-investment cycles and economic growth.
-17.5% (1Y)
Strengths: 8/30 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is stable or improving over time
Quality
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin
Operating margin: -1535.8% (negative)
Fundamental
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
46
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
26
Quality
63
Value
50
Momentum
24
Risk
54
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
46
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of NextNav Inc. has centered on its financial performance and strategic partnerships. After its Q2 2026 earnings call, analysts noted improved balance sheet strength and liquidity, alongside progress in regulatory efforts for its 900 MHz terrestrial positioning network. The company also announced a partnership with Tiami Networks to counter unmanned aircraft threats. Investor discussions highlighted potential undervaluation, with some analysts suggesting the stock may be underpriced despite flat revenue and shifting losses toward profitability. Additionally, NextNav’s participation in the HC Wainwright Global Investor Conference drew attention.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about NextNav Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 10 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
18
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
27
Psychology
40
Fundamentals
46
Technical
24
Valuation
50
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
-19%
Market Narrative
55
Fundamental Reality
27
Narrative Gap
+28
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant Loss Aversion (78) reflects a market deeply anchored to recent losses (-27.2% in 3 months), where traders hesitate to lock in further declines or re-engage. The Confirmation Bias (33) suggests investors cling to a positive narrative despite deteriorating fundamentals (margin compression, stagnant revenue), reinforcing the status quo. Meanwhile, FOMO and Euphoria are muted by weak momentum (-18% ROC) and oversold conditions (neutral RSI, below 200-day average). The key question: *Will traders eventually accept the narrative gap and fundamentals, or will loss aversion persist as a self-fulfilling cycle?*
Updated: 09/05/2026, 12:52 AM
What could change this?
📈 5D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Benjamin Graham — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 11/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide between traditional value investors and more cautious or cyclical approaches. Benjamin Graham’s defensive and enterprising frameworks both score perfectly, signaling a strong fit for his margin-of-safety principles—though the enterprising model lacks enough data for a definitive read. Meanwhile, Samuel Armstrong Nelson’s cyclical analysis leans favorably, while Walter Bagehot’s liquidity focus suggests resilience in stress scenarios. In contrast, growth-oriented methodologies like Peter Lynch’s and Philip Fisher’s score poorly, dismissing it as lacking either sustainable growth or quality. The middle-ground approaches—Howard Marks’ mixed valuation and Jack Schwager’s neutral stance—highlight a tension between the stock’s potential and its perceived risk, while efficient-market theorists and volatility-sensitive investors like Morgan Housel outright reject it. The extremes of Livermore’s trend-following and Veblen’s critique of speculative growth further underscore the stock’s polarizing nature.
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 100
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 100
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 100
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 20%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 93
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 76
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 75
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 62
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 57
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 52
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 48
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 36
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 36
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 33
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 31
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 21
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 11
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 285 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 8 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
-1535.8%
Net Margin
-4138.5%
EBITDA Margin
-1366.3%
ROE
219.5%
ROA
-76.6%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$1.42
Cash
$44.76M
Total Debt
$273.59M
Current Ratio
12.71
Debt/Equity
-3.17
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$13.97
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$8,639.66
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
⚠️ Extreme
Model output is extreme — likely a data/model limitation for this stock, not a reliable fair-value read.
Year 1 Growth Rate
8.6%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.6% | $-55.17M | $-50.61M |
| 2 | 7.1% | $-59.07M | $-49.72M |
| 3 | 5.6% | $-62.36M | $-48.15M |
| 4 | 4.0% | $-64.87M | $-45.95M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-66.49M | $-43.21M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-50.80M
Terminal Value
$-1.05B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-681.43M
Enterprise Value
$-919.09M
Net Debt
$228.83M
Equity Value
$-1.15B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
-$649.04
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$1,110.62
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 10 positive, 9 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 22.9.2026
Benzinga · 21.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 10.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 25.8.2026
Business Wire · 25.8.2026
Yahoo · 24.8.2026
Business Wire · 24.8.2026
Motley Fool · 18.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 18.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 17.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 16.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 16.8.2026
Moby · 12.8.2026
MarketBeat · 12.8.2026
Yahoo · 12.8.2026
Zacks · 11.8.2026
Yahoo · 11.8.2026
Yahoo · 11.8.2026
NextNav Inc. (NN) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 46/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
NN currently scores 46/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
NN's technical score is 24/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Return on equity (ROE): 219.5% — strong; Debt/equity: -3.17.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin: -1535.8% (negative); Net margin: -4138.5% (negative); ATR: 7.4% of price.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for NN.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 9 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sorond Mariam | Open Market Sale | 3.9.2026 | 69,853 | -69,853 | $15.30 |
| Shams Sammaad | Open Market Sale | 29.6.2026 | 2,006 | -2,006 | $17.84 |
| Insley Susan Brasse | Open Market Sale | 24.6.2026 | 2,370 | -2,370 | $17.13 |
| Insley Susan Brasse | Open Market Sale | 24.6.2026 | 167,054 | -2,370 | $17.13 |
| SUBIN NEIL S | Option Exercise (in-the-money) | 23.6.2026 | 250,000 | +250,000 | $11.50 |
| SUBIN NEIL S | Option Exercise (in-the-money) | 23.6.2026 | 250,000 | -250,000 | — |
| SUBIN NEIL S | Option Exercise (in-the-money) | 23.6.2026 | 2,765,213 | +250,000 | $11.50 |
| SUBIN NEIL S | Option Exercise (in-the-money) | 23.6.2026 | 0 | -250,000 | — |
| SUBIN NEIL S | Conversion of Derivative Security | 22.6.2026 | 502,707 | -502,707 | — |
| SUBIN NEIL S | Conversion of Derivative Security | 22.6.2026 | 502,707 | +502,707 | — |
| SUBIN NEIL S | Conversion of Derivative Security | 22.6.2026 | 502,707 | +502,707 | — |
| SUBIN NEIL S | Conversion of Derivative Security | 22.6.2026 | 0 | -502,707 | — |
| FIG Buyer GP, LLC | Conversion of Derivative Security | 17.6.2026 | 50,000,000 | -50,000,000 | — |
| FIG Buyer GP, LLC | Conversion of Derivative Security | 17.6.2026 | 3,989,738 | +3,989,738 | $12.56 |
| Foundation Holdco LP | Conversion of Derivative Security | 17.6.2026 | 3,989,738 | +3,989,738 | $12.56 |
| Foundation Holdco LP | Conversion of Derivative Security | 17.6.2026 | 50,000,000 | -50,000,000 | — |
| FIG LLC | Conversion of Derivative Security | 17.6.2026 | 3,989,738 | +3,989,738 | $12.56 |
| FIG LLC | Conversion of Derivative Security | 17.6.2026 | 0 | -50,000,000 | — |
| FINCO I Intermediate Holdco LLC | Conversion of Derivative Security | 17.6.2026 | 3,989,738 | +3,989,738 | $12.56 |
| FINCO I Intermediate Holdco LLC | Conversion of Derivative Security | 17.6.2026 | 0 | -50,000,000 | — |
| Insley Susan Brasse | Open Market Sale | 16.6.2026 | 849 | -849 | $19.36 |
| Sorond Mariam | Open Market Sale | 16.6.2026 | 2,830 | -2,830 | $18.33 |
| Black James S | Open Market Sale | 12.6.2026 | 1,878 | -1,878 | $22.96 |
| Black James S | Open Market Sale | 12.6.2026 | 91,688 | -1,878 | $22.96 |
| Sorond Mariam | Open Market Sale | 1.6.2026 | 67,553 | -67,553 | $19.89 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
16,536,325 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 15,153,746 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
60.5% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 60.8% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology