Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Staples · ·
$101.34
▼ $1.60 (-1.6%)
Market data updated: 09/16 04:15 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/16/2026
News analyzed: 09/16/2026
Market Cap
$2.77B
Day Range
$98.01 - $102.17
52-Week Range
$98.01 - $184.26
Beta
—
Next Earnings
02.11.2026
MZTI is a stock from the Consumer Defensive sector — Food, beverages, and household products — steady demand even in a recession, since these are essential consumer goods.
-44.4% (1Y)
Strengths: 10/32 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Leverage risk
Debt/equity: 0.19
Risk
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is eroding over time
Quality
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
49
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
64
Quality
47
Value
55
Momentum
13
Risk
54
Sentiment
56
Fundamental
74
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of The Marzetti Company highlights its financial performance and operational challenges. The company reported a slight quarterly sales decline (2.2% to $465 million) in Q4 2026, though adjusted sales grew, due to a temporary supply agreement ending. A foodborne outbreak and broader industry-wide livestock price volatility—affecting margins—led to a cut in guidance and a dip in stock value alongside peers. Additionally, the company’s long-standing dividend track record (63 years) and recent rebranding from Lancaster Colony were noted, alongside leadership appointments to an advisory board.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about The Marzetti Company. News trend score: 56. Reason: 7 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 6 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
22
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
37
Psychology
34
Fundamentals
74
Technical
13
Valuation
55
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
-4%
Market Narrative
27
Fundamental Reality
37
Narrative Gap
-10
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant anchoring behavior at 86 suggests traders are fixating on the near-term support level (0.7% proximity), likely treating it as a psychological barrier. The narrative gap (-6) hints at a disconnect between market sentiment (31) and objective reality (37), possibly reinforcing this anchor. While panic selling (26) shows cautious activity, it lacks panic-level volatility or extreme volume spikes. The key question is whether the support holds or if traders will reconsider their reference point under pressure. No clear bias toward aggressive buying or selling beyond anchoring is evident.
Updated: 09/05/2026, 04:48 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"foodborne outbreak headwinds in Q1"
"business that has increased its regular dividend for 63 consecutive years"
"national cattle shortages and volatile livestock prices squeezed operating margins"
"appointed Kristin Bird, president of food service at The Marzetti Company, to advisory board"
📈 3D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 99/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 12/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for MZTI reflects deep methodological differences in how these investors evaluate stocks. Samuel Armstrong Nelson and Charles Mackay’s near-perfect scores highlight their focus on market psychology and cycle positioning—both seeing it as oversold or free of crowd-driven euphoria, which aligns with their contrarian or sentiment-driven approaches. In contrast, Philip Fisher and Jesse Livermore’s abysmal scores stem from Fisher’s insistence on long-term quality/growth traits and Livermore’s strict adherence to trading with the prevailing trend, neither of which MZTI appears to satisfy. Meanwhile, the middle-ground methodologies—like Howard Marks’ risk-adjusted view or Peter Lynch’s mixed assessment—balance growth potential with valuation caution, while Benjamin Graham’s split verdicts underscore the stock’s failure to meet both his conservative and enterprising investor criteria. The contrast between high-scoring cycle analysts and low-scoring fundamentalists underscores whether the stock’s appeal lies in timing or intrinsic merit.
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 99
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 96
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 83
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 79
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 69
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 60
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 57
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 56
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 55
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 54
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 52
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 47
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 44
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 35
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 14
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 12
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 279 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 10 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a trading range, but the picture isn't yet clear enough on the likely direction.
Low confidence
$98.00
Range Bottom
$120.99
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
24.7%
Operating Margin
12.4%
Net Margin
9.9%
EBITDA Margin
16.1%
ROE
18.2%
ROA
11.9%
ROIC
—
EPS
$6.98
Cash
$25.10M
Total Debt
$199.28M
Current Ratio
1.56
Debt/Equity
0.19
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 8.9.2026 | $1.000 |
| 5.6.2026 | $1.000 |
| 4.6.2026 | $1.000 |
| 6.3.2026 | $1.000 |
| 5.3.2026 | $1.000 |
| 5.12.2025 | $1.000 |
| 4.12.2025 | $1.000 |
| 8.9.2025 | $0.950 |
| 7.9.2025 | $0.950 |
| 6.6.2025 | $0.950 |
| 5.6.2025 | $0.950 |
| 7.3.2025 | $0.950 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$101.34
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$110.70
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+9.2%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
1.9%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.9% | $210.11M | $192.76M |
| 2 | 2.1% | $214.46M | $180.51M |
| 3 | 2.2% | $219.21M | $169.27M |
| 4 | 2.4% | $224.37M | $158.95M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $229.98M | $149.47M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$206.14M
Terminal Value
$3.63B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$2.36B
Enterprise Value
$3.21B
Net Debt
$174.18M
Equity Value
$3.03B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$38.43
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$15.59
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 7 positive, 7 neutral, 6 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
StockStory · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
StockStory · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 1.9.2026
Motley Fool · 1.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
PR Newswire · 1.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 31.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 28.8.2026
Yahoo · 28.8.2026
Insider Monkey · 28.8.2026
Yahoo · 26.8.2026
MarketBeat · 26.8.2026
Benzinga · 26.8.2026
Yahoo · 26.8.2026
The Marzetti Company (MZTI) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 49/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
MZTI currently scores 49/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, MZTI's estimated fair value is $110.70, which is 9.2% above the current price of $101.34. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
MZTI's technical score is 13/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Debt/equity: 0.19; Current ratio: 1.56; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 15.0%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is eroding over time; Calmar: -0.32 (3y annualized return -16.4% / max drawdown 51.3%); Price is below the 50-day average.
Yes — MZTI has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viso Luis | Tax Withholding in Shares | 25.8.2026 | 2,044 | -152 | $116.05 |
| Bird Kristin | Tax Withholding in Shares | 25.8.2026 | 6,285 | -180 | $116.05 |
| Pigott, Thomas K. | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.8.2026 | 18,309 | +1,026 | — |
| Ciesinski David Alan | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.8.2026 | 61,133 | +4,177 | — |
| Bird Kristin | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.8.2026 | 6,465 | +623 | — |
| Ciesinski David Alan | Tax Withholding in Shares | 25.8.2026 | 59,522 | -1,611 | $116.05 |
| Viso Luis | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.8.2026 | 2,196 | +527 | — |
| Pigott, Thomas K. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 25.8.2026 | 18,011 | -298 | $116.05 |
| Viso Luis | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.8.2026 | 527 | +527 | — |
| Pigott, Thomas K. | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.8.2026 | 1,026 | +1,026 | — |
| Ciesinski David Alan | Tax Withholding in Shares | 25.8.2026 | 1,611 | -1,611 | $116.05 |
| Viso Luis | Tax Withholding in Shares | 25.8.2026 | 152 | -152 | $116.05 |
| Pigott, Thomas K. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 25.8.2026 | 298 | -298 | $116.05 |
| Ciesinski David Alan | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.8.2026 | 4,177 | +4,177 | — |
| Bird Kristin | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.8.2026 | 623 | +623 | — |
| Bird Kristin | Tax Withholding in Shares | 25.8.2026 | 180 | -180 | $116.05 |
| Carter Mark | Grant/Award from Employer | 18.8.2026 | 4,326 | +4,326 | — |
| Carter Mark | Grant/Award from Employer | 18.8.2026 | 1,947 | +1,947 | — |
| Berman Tanya | Grant/Award from Employer | 18.8.2026 | 1,947 | +1,947 | — |
| Bird Kristin | Grant/Award from Employer | 18.8.2026 | 1,947 | +1,947 | — |
| Pigott, Thomas K. | Grant/Award from Employer | 18.8.2026 | 3,504 | +3,504 | — |
| Ciesinski David Alan | Grant/Award from Employer | 18.8.2026 | 14,406 | +14,406 | — |
| Ciesinski David Alan | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.8.2026 | 2,055 | -2,055 | $116.05 |
| Bird Kristin | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.8.2026 | 301 | -301 | $116.05 |
| Pigott, Thomas K. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.8.2026 | 496 | -496 | $116.05 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
2,305,003 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 2,131,824 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
59.4% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 77.1% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology