Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Miscellaneous · ·
$0.69
▲ $0.00 (+0.3%)
Market data updated: 09/27 10:08 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/27/2026
News analyzed: 09/27/2026
Market Cap
$264.60M
Day Range
$0.66 - $0.70
52-Week Range
$0.56 - $7.12
Beta
—
Next Earnings
09.11.2026
Support
$0.56
Resistance
$1.02
-82.3% (1Y)
Strengths: 13/32 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $4.40 vs. price $0.69 (+539.8%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Net margin
Net margin: -6.8% (negative)
Fundamental
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
52
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
Not enough data yet to generate this synthesis.
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
79
Quality
63
Value
67
Momentum
40
Risk
32
Sentiment
56
Fundamental
32
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent coverage of Microvast Holdings has centered on its Q2 2026 earnings. The company reported adjusted EPS of $(0.01) and sales of $87.3 million, both falling short of analyst expectations, prompting HC Wainwright to keep a Buy rating but cut its price target to $4. Earnings call summaries and presentations highlighted continued European growth initiatives, while the earnings call schedule and detailed financial results were widely disseminated across news outlets.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Microvast Holdings, Inc.. News trend score: 56. Reason: 3 of the last 13 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
18
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
44
Psychology
92
Fundamentals
32
Technical
40
Valuation
67
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
-38%
Market Narrative
46
Fundamental Reality
44
Narrative Gap
+2
📈 3D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 92/100
🔴 Weakest match
Gerald M. Loeb — 32/100
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 92
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 91
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 83
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 80
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 77
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 63
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 61
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 61
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 59
Some discount, but not the deep 'net-net' bargain Graham's enterprising bar sets
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 56
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 51
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 50
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 39
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 34
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 34
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 32
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 287 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (3 bullish · 6 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
28.6%
Operating Margin
1.6%
Net Margin
-6.8%
EBITDA Margin
1.6%
ROE
-7.1%
ROA
-2.9%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$0.09
Cash
$104.96M
Total Debt
$106.28M
Current Ratio
0.92
Debt/Equity
0.26
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$0.69
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$4.40
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+539.8%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
25.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25.0% | $70.09M | $64.31M |
| 2 | 19.4% | $83.67M | $70.43M |
| 3 | 13.8% | $95.18M | $73.49M |
| 4 | 8.1% | $102.91M | $72.90M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $105.48M | $68.56M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$56.07M
Terminal Value
$1.66B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$1.08B
Enterprise Value
$1.43B
Net Debt
$1.32M
Equity Value
$1.43B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$1.26
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$1.26
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 3 positive, 8 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 13 articles.
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 13.8.2026
Moby · 11.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 11.8.2026
MarketBeat · 11.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 10.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 10.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 10.8.2026
Benzinga · 10.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 6.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 10.7.2026
Insider Monkey · 3.7.2026
Simply Wall St. · 7.6.2026
Microvast Holdings, Inc. (MVST) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 52/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
MVST currently scores 52/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, MVST's estimated fair value is $4.40, which is 539.8% above the current price of $0.69. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
MVST's technical score is 40/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $4.40 vs. price $0.69 (+539.8%); Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 85.2%; Free cash flow growth: 325.1%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Net margin: -6.8% (negative); ATR: 7.6% of price; Current ratio: 0.92.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for MVST.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 8 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mattis Wenjuan | Open Market Sale | 10.6.2026 | 4,705 | -4,705 | $1.10 |
| Mattis Wenjuan | Open Market Sale | 10.6.2026 | 927,973 | -4,705 | $1.10 |
| Wu Yang | Open Market Sale | 9.6.2026 | 46,313 | -46,313 | $1.24 |
| Tushe Isida | Open Market Sale | 9.6.2026 | 6,403 | -6,403 | $1.24 |
| Wu Yang | Open Market Sale | 9.6.2026 | 134,065,439 | -46,313 | $1.24 |
| Tushe Isida | Open Market Sale | 9.6.2026 | 184,100 | -6,403 | $1.24 |
| Wu Yang | Conversion of Derivative Security | 28.5.2026 | 50,000,000 | +50,000,000 | $0.50 |
| Wu Yang | Conversion of Derivative Security | 28.5.2026 | 134,111,752 | +50,000,000 | $0.50 |
| Wu Yang | Conversion of Derivative Security | 28.5.2026 | 0 | +0 | — |
| Mattis Wenjuan | Open Market Sale | 18.5.2026 | 48,346 | -48,346 | $1.32 |
| Mattis Wenjuan | Open Market Sale | 18.5.2026 | 932,678 | -48,346 | $1.32 |
| Ying Wei | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.4.2026 | 20,000 | +20,000 | — |
| Wong Arthur Lap Tat | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.4.2026 | 20,000 | +20,000 | — |
| Pan Yixin | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.4.2026 | 20,000 | +20,000 | — |
| Wong Arthur Lap Tat | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.4.2026 | 237,473 | +20,000 | — |
| Pan Yixin | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.4.2026 | 188,239 | +20,000 | — |
| Ying Wei | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.4.2026 | 388,789 | +20,000 | — |
| Wu Shengxian | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.3.2026 | 15,503 | +15,503 | — |
| Mattis Wenjuan | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.3.2026 | 10,335 | +10,335 | — |
| Wu Yang | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.3.2026 | 93,135 | +93,135 | — |
| Wu Yang | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.3.2026 | 84,111,752 | +93,135 | — |
| Mattis Wenjuan | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.3.2026 | 981,024 | +10,335 | — |
| Wu Shengxian | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.3.2026 | 233,799 | +15,503 | — |
| Tushe Isida | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.3.2026 | 15,503 | +15,503 | — |
| Tushe Isida | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.3.2026 | 190,503 | +15,503 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
22,217,212 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 23,271,123 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
63.3% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 68.7% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology