Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· ·
$14.35
▼ $1.24 (-8.0%)
Market data updated: 09/29 02:05 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/29/2026
News analyzed: 09/29/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$14.32 - $15.47
52-Week Range
$14.11 - $30.28
Beta
—
Next Earnings
26.10.2026
Support
$14.11
Resistance
$17.65
-39.6% (1Y)
Strengths: 10/31 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🟡 Mixed
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 161.1%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $7.32 vs. price $14.35 (-49.0%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (76/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (33/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
49
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
76
Quality
63
Value
33
Momentum
13
Risk
46
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
54
Institutional
50
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Mirion Technologies, Inc. has centered on its stock performance following a positive analyst rating. On September 3, 2026, Jefferies initiated coverage with a Buy rating and a $20 price target, sparking an 8.3% stock jump. Analyst Laurence Alexander highlighted the company’s potential, though broader discussions caution investors about evaluating mid-cap stocks under $50 for stability and business strength. No other substantive developments were reported.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Mirion Technologies, Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 9 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
31
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
67
Fundamentals
54
Technical
13
Valuation
33
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-20%
Market Narrative
66
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+24
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for MIR suggests a dominant FOMO-driven environment, reinforced by strong momentum (+8.5% ROC), elevated volume (1.38x average), and extreme positive sentiment (98/100). Overconfidence (55) aligns with valuation far exceeding DCF (+131%) and detached price growth from fundamentals. The narrative gap (44) hints at a disconnect between optimistic expectations and underlying reality. The key question: *Will traders sustain momentum despite valuation extremes, or will anchoring near resistance (4.3%) trigger profit-taking?*
Updated: 09/08/2026, 02:44 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Jefferies analyst Laurence Alexander initiates coverage on Mirion Technologies (NYSE:MIR) with a Buy rating and announces Price Target of $20."
"Stocks in the $10-50 range offer a sweet spot between affordability and stability."
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 96/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 8/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for MIR reflects deep methodological contrasts: Walter Bagehot’s near-perfect score highlights the stock’s liquidity resilience—ideal for his credit-squeeze playbook—while Peter Lynch’s enthusiasm for growth potential contrasts sharply with the caution of Benjamin Graham, whose defensive framework dismisses it outright as statistically unsafe. Meanwhile, the mixed signals from Fisher, Veblen, and Marks suggest a business with promise but not the exceptional quality or pricing power either investor prioritizes. The extreme polarities—from Nelson’s near-zero score (overbought cycle) to Livermore’s outright negative trend verdict—stem from divergent priorities: momentum traders (Livermore, Schwager) see no setup, while value purists (Graham, Nelson) flag structural risks. Even moderate voices like Housel and Loeb acknowledge holdability but avoid the aggressive bets Lynch or Bagehot would embrace.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 96
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 96
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 81
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 76
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 65
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 65
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 61
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 57
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 56
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 53
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 48
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 46
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 44
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 40
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 8
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 288 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 10 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
A pattern consistent with an early/mid accumulation phase — a trading range after a decline with declining volume.
Medium confidence
$14.11
Range Bottom
$17.65
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
47.4%
Operating Margin
5.6%
Net Margin
3.1%
EBITDA Margin
20.5%
ROE
1.5%
ROA
0.8%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.13
Cash
$412.30M
Total Debt
$444.70M
Current Ratio
2.83
Debt/Equity
0.24
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$14.35
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$7.32
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-49.0%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
8.9%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.9% | $116.36M | $106.76M |
| 2 | 7.3% | $124.82M | $105.06M |
| 3 | 5.7% | $131.90M | $101.85M |
| 4 | 4.1% | $137.30M | $97.26M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $140.73M | $91.46M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$106.90M
Terminal Value
$2.22B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$1.44B
Enterprise Value
$1.94B
Net Debt
$32.40M
Equity Value
$1.91B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$7.15
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$2.34
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 11 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 26.9.2026
Yahoo · 25.9.2026
Yahoo · 25.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 23.9.2026
Yahoo · 22.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
StockStory · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
Motley Fool · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
StockStory · 4.9.2026
Fintel · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
StockStory · 3.9.2026
MT Newswires · 3.9.2026
Benzinga · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
StockStory · 3.9.2026
MT Newswires · 3.9.2026
Mirion Technologies, Inc. (MIR) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 49/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
MIR currently scores 49/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, MIR's estimated fair value is $7.32, which is 49.0% below the current price of $14.35. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
MIR's technical score is 13/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 161.1%; Free cash flow growth: 112.5%; Net income growth: 179.8%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $7.32 vs. price $14.35 (-49.0%); ATR: 4.9% of price; Calmar: 0.47 (3y annualized return 24.3% / max drawdown 51.8%).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for MIR.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 2 purchases and 2 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schopfer Brian | Open Market Purchase | 2.9.2026 | 933,290 | +20,000 | $15.60 |
| Schopfer Brian | Open Market Purchase | 2.9.2026 | 20,000 | +20,000 | $15.60 |
| Kingsley Lawrence D | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 1,095 | +1,095 | $17.46 |
| Markopoulos Jody | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 7,383 | +7,383 | — |
| KUO JOHN W | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 7,383 | +7,383 | — |
| Kingsley Lawrence D | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 7,383 | +7,383 | — |
| Bockhorst Kenneth | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 7,383 | +7,383 | — |
| Etzel Steven W. | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 7,383 | +7,383 | — |
| CASCELLA ROBERT | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 7,383 | +7,383 | — |
| Rege Sheila | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 7,383 | +7,383 | — |
| CASCELLA ROBERT | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 60,801 | +7,383 | — |
| KUO JOHN W | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 80,119 | +7,383 | — |
| Etzel Steven W. | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 87,448 | +7,383 | — |
| Rege Sheila | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 49,877 | +7,383 | — |
| Markopoulos Jody | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 81,509 | +7,383 | — |
| Kingsley Lawrence D | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 71,430 | +7,383 | — |
| Bockhorst Kenneth | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 77,258 | +7,383 | — |
| Moore Christopher A. | Open Market Sale | 7.5.2026 | 8,400 | -8,400 | $19.64 |
| Moore Christopher A. | Open Market Sale | 7.5.2026 | 22,157 | -8,400 | $19.64 |
| Logan Thomas D | Gift | 6.5.2026 | 311,851 | -311,851 | — |
| Logan Thomas D | Gift | 6.5.2026 | 52,209 | -311,851 | — |
| Schopfer Brian | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.4.2026 | 7,377 | -7,377 | $18.59 |
| Lee Emmanuelle | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.4.2026 | 4,680 | -4,680 | $18.59 |
| Moore Christopher A. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.4.2026 | 1,903 | -1,903 | $18.59 |
| Ulrich Alison | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.4.2026 | 2,053 | -2,053 | $18.59 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
39,703,629 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 35,906,916 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
60.4% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 79.4% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology