Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$8.02
▲ $0.20 (+2.6%)
Market data updated: 09/19 01:45 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/18/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$2.02B
Day Range
$7.88 - $8.18
52-Week Range
$6.47 - $15.81
Beta
—
Next Earnings
21.10.2026
Support
$7.10
Resistance
$10.35
MBLY is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
-43.6% (1Y)
Strengths: 8/28 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $9.97 vs. price $8.02 (+24.4%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin
Operating margin: -23.2% (negative)
Fundamental
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
47
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
79
Quality
42
Value
62
Momentum
16
Risk
40
Sentiment
86
Fundamental
35
Institutional
100
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **Mobileye Global Inc.** has centered on its stock valuation and internal developments. Notably, an insider purchase of nearly 12,000 shares signaled confidence amid leadership changes, including the CEO’s departure. Analysts also highlighted Mobileye’s potential undervaluation—up to 43%—driven by advancements in advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS), though broader market trends remain mixed. Intel’s strategic investment in Mobileye was briefly referenced as part of its broader autonomous tech focus. Overall, themes include stock performance, insider activity, and technological progress.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Mobileye Global Inc.. News trend score: 86. Reason: 8 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
19
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
44
Psychology
29
Fundamentals
35
Technical
16
Valuation
62
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
-5%
Market Narrative
40
Fundamental Reality
44
Narrative Gap
-4
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
MBLY’s psychology is dominated by **loss aversion**, consistent with a 9.6% drop over three months and muted trading activity. The narrative-reality gap (-3) suggests traders may be underestimating the stock’s current valuation or growth potential, while low FOMO (score 9) and herding (0) imply limited contagion. The key question: *Is the pullback a buying opportunity, or will traders cling to losses until clearer catalysts emerge?* Overconfidence and euphoria are absent, reinforcing a cautious, risk-averse stance.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 06:44 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Mobileye Global stock is caught between two very different valuation signals... intrinsic value estimate... 43% undervalued after ADAS progress"
"Over the past 3 years, Mobileye Global shareholders have seen the share price decline about 73%"
"Intel’s concentrated bet on autonomous flight and self-driving cars"
"Safroadu Yeboah-Amankwah's $100,175 purchase signals confidence in the autonomous driving company despite the CEO stepping down"
📈 8D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 19/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide between traditional value investors and more cautious or trend-following methodologies. Benjamin Graham’s *Enterprising Investor* and Walter Bagehot both rate it near-perfectly, seeing deep liquidity and statistical undervaluation—suggesting it’s a rare, resilient opportunity. Meanwhile, Samuel Nelson and Charles Mackay lean bullish due to favorable cycle positioning and the absence of speculative mania, while Thorstein Veblen and Howard Marks (in his business-focused approach) acknowledge growth aligned with real value. However, Fisher, Malkiel/Bogle, and Schwager dismiss it outright, either because it lacks Fisher’s signature quality/growth traits, fails to outperform an index, or lacks a clear technical setup. At the extremes, Livermore’s low score and Bagehot’s high score highlight a tension between defensive caution and opportunistic resilience—one framework sees it as a credit-proof fortress, while another sees it as a contrarian misfit.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 100
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 98
Deep statistical discount — a real Enterprising Investor candidate
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 86
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 86
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 81
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 69
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 65
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 65
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 65
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 61
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 50
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 49
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 45
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 41
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 39
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 19
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 279 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 9 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
47.7%
Operating Margin
-23.2%
Net Margin
-20.7%
EBITDA Margin
-19.3%
ROE
-3.3%
ROA
-3.1%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$0.48
Cash
$1.84B
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
6.10
Debt/Equity
—
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$8.02
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$9.97
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+24.4%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
1.8%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.8% | $532.25M | $488.30M |
| 2 | 2.0% | $542.63M | $456.72M |
| 3 | 2.1% | $554.21M | $427.95M |
| 4 | 2.3% | $567.05M | $401.71M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $581.23M | $377.76M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$523.00M
Terminal Value
$9.17B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$5.96B
Enterprise Value
$8.11B
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$8.11B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$14.61
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$3.09
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 8 positive, 10 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Trefis · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
PR Newswire · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Trefis · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 28.8.2026
Exec Edge · 21.8.2026
Motley Fool · 19.8.2026
Yahoo · 19.8.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 18.8.2026
Yahoo · 18.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 18.8.2026
Yahoo · 18.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 17.8.2026
Yahoo · 17.8.2026
Mobileye Global Inc. (MBLY) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 47/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
MBLY currently scores 47/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, MBLY's estimated fair value is $9.97, which is 24.4% above the current price of $8.02. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
MBLY's technical score is 16/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $9.97 vs. price $8.02 (+24.4%); Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 87.4%; Free cash flow growth: 63.9%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin: -23.2% (negative); Net margin: -20.7% (negative); Operating margin is eroding over time.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for MBLY.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 4 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yeboah-Amankwah Safroadu | Open Market Purchase | 6.8.2026 | 11,841 | +11,841 | $8.46 |
| Yeboah-Amankwah Safroadu | Open Market Purchase | 6.8.2026 | 84,336 | +11,841 | $8.46 |
| Yeary Frank D | Open Market Purchase | 30.7.2026 | 12,360 | +12,360 | $7.98 |
| Yeary Frank D | Open Market Purchase | 30.7.2026 | 12,360 | +12,360 | $7.98 |
| Nehushtan Nimrod | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.7.2026 | 199,680 | +199,680 | — |
| Ouriel Boaz | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.7.2026 | 266,240 | +266,240 | — |
| Shalev-Shwartz Shai | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.7.2026 | 1,064,962 | +1,064,962 | — |
| Shashua Amnon | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.7.2026 | 1,618,743 | +1,618,743 | — |
| Shemesh Rojansky Moran | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.7.2026 | 212,992 | +212,992 | — |
| Shashua Amnon | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.7.2026 | 22,142,999 | +1,618,743 | — |
| Ouriel Boaz | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.7.2026 | 485,243 | +266,240 | — |
| Shemesh Rojansky Moran | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.7.2026 | 443,479 | +212,992 | — |
| Shalev-Shwartz Shai | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.7.2026 | 8,113,010 | +1,064,962 | — |
| Nehushtan Nimrod | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.7.2026 | 496,002 | +199,680 | — |
| Shashua Amnon | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.2.2026 | 13,988,788 | +13,988,788 | — |
| Shalev-Shwartz Shai | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.2.2026 | 536,835 | +536,835 | — |
| Shashua Amnon | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.2.2026 | 1,554,310 | +1,554,310 | — |
| Shalev-Shwartz Shai | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.2.2026 | 4,831,528 | +4,831,528 | — |
| Shashua Amnon | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.2.2026 | 6,535,468 | +1,554,310 | — |
| Shashua Amnon | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.2.2026 | 20,524,256 | +13,988,788 | — |
| Shalev-Shwartz Shai | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.2.2026 | 2,216,520 | +536,835 | — |
| Shalev-Shwartz Shai | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.2.2026 | 7,048,048 | +4,831,528 | — |
| Yeboah-Amankwah Safroadu | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.12.2025 | 12,180 | +12,180 | — |
| Yeary Frank D | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.12.2025 | 20,300 | +20,300 | — |
| McCaskill Claire C. | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.12.2025 | 20,300 | +20,300 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
36,831,270 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 34,341,280 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
37.8% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 46.5% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology