Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$9.98
▼ $0.08 (-0.8%)
Market data updated: 09/27 04:58 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/27/2026
News analyzed: 09/27/2026
Market Cap
$698.96M
Day Range
$9.92 - $10.29
52-Week Range
$5.83 - $18.94
Beta
—
Next Earnings
09.11.2026
Support
$8.70
Resistance
$15.61
LPTH is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
+53.5% (1Y)
Strengths: 5/28 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 92.8%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$7.88 vs. price $9.98 (-179.0%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
43
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
today · $9.98
Evidence: Narrative Gap moved from -4 to 25 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
40
Quality
42
Value
38
Momentum
34
Risk
48
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
32
Institutional
13
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of LightPath Technologies, Inc. has centered on analyst upgrades and price target adjustments. Piper Sandler initiated coverage with an Overweight rating and $15 price target (August 12), while Canaccord Genuity maintained a Buy rating but lowered its target to $15.5 (September 1). The company’s focus on expanding its role in the Western supply chain was also highlighted (August 19). No earnings reports or major operational updates were directly mentioned, though broader tech stock movements included LightPath among gains.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about LightPath Technologies, Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 12 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
17
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
37
Psychology
80
Fundamentals
32
Technical
34
Valuation
38
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-24%
Market Narrative
62
Fundamental Reality
37
Narrative Gap
+25
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for LPTH suggests a dominant loss aversion bias, as the 35.2% three-month decline and elevated volume imply traders are hesitant to lock in losses. While panic selling (42) and FOMO (4) are present, they are muted by subdued volatility and neutral momentum. The narrative gap (-4) hints at a slight disconnect between market sentiment and fundamentals, but the key question remains: *Will traders exit cautiously or hold for recovery?*
Updated: 09/07/2026, 11:01 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Piper Sandler initiates LightPath Technologies at Overweight, With $15 Price Target"
"Broadening in scope, and more critical to the Western supply chain"
"LightPath Technologies (LPTH) Undervalued As Its $11 Million Defense Order Lifts Attention"
"LightPath Technologies Signs Definitive Agreement to Divest China Operations"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 3D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock splits methodologies into two stark camps: those who see it as a cautiously favorable opportunity and those who dismiss it outright. The highest-scoring approaches—Charles Mackay’s crowd psychology, Howard Marks’ market cycle analysis, and Samuel Armstrong Nelson’s oversold positioning—all suggest the stock isn’t in a manic bubble or overextended, framing it as a low-risk, cyclically attractive play. Meanwhile, the middle tier (Jack Schwager, Edgar Lawrence Smith, and even Gerald Loeb) acknowledges some merit but flags concerns like moderate risk or lack of long-term defensibility. The sharp divide emerges at the bottom, where Graham, Bagehot, and Fisher outright reject it for failing core principles—whether due to liquidity risks, lack of quality/growth, or statistical cheapness. The contrast highlights a tension between cyclical timing (which sees potential) and fundamental or behavioral red flags (which see it as overvalued or volatile).
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 100
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 76
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 76
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 53
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 51
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 51
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 50
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 44
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 43
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 43
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 35
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 35
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 33
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 27
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 12
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 285 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (2 bullish · 7 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
36.0%
Operating Margin
-27.4%
Net Margin
-28.6%
EBITDA Margin
-20.4%
ROE
-13.7%
ROA
-10.6%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$0.38
Cash
$93.20M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
4.96
Debt/Equity
—
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$9.98
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$7.88
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-179.0%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
25.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25.0% | $-20.62M | $-18.91M |
| 2 | 19.4% | $-24.61M | $-20.71M |
| 3 | 13.8% | $-28.00M | $-21.62M |
| 4 | 8.1% | $-30.27M | $-21.44M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-31.03M | $-20.17M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-16.49M
Terminal Value
$-489.27M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-317.99M
Enterprise Value
$-420.85M
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$-420.85M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$2.80
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$2.12
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 12 positive, 7 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 13.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 13.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Motley Fool · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Moby · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
GuruFocus.com · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
MarketBeat · 10.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Zacks · 10.9.2026
ChartMill · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
ACCESS Newswire · 10.9.2026
Benzinga · 10.9.2026
LightPath Technologies, Inc. (LPTH) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 43/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
LPTH currently scores 43/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, LPTH's estimated fair value is -$7.88, which is 179.0% below the current price of $9.98. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
LPTH's technical score is 34/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 92.8%; Current ratio: 4.96; MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$7.88 vs. price $9.98 (-179.0%); Operating margin: -27.4% (negative); Net margin: -28.6% (negative).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for LPTH.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 2 purchases and 13 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubin Shmuel | Grant/Award from Employer | 18.8.2026 | 39,381 | +39,381 | — |
| Miranda Albert | Grant/Award from Employer | 18.8.2026 | 17,091 | +17,091 | — |
| North Run Strategic Opportunities Fund I, LP | Open Market Sale | 3.6.2026 | 3,571,400 | -3,571,400 | $14.00 |
| HAMMER TODD B | Open Market Sale | 3.6.2026 | 2,934,828 | -3,571,400 | $14.00 |
| North Run Strategic Opportunities Fund I, LP | Conversion of Derivative Security | 2.6.2026 | 7,678.51 | -7,678.51 | — |
| North Run Strategic Opportunities Fund I, LP | Conversion of Derivative Security | 2.6.2026 | 3,571,400 | +3,571,400 | $2.15 |
| HAMMER TODD B | Conversion of Derivative Security | 2.6.2026 | 6,506,228 | +3,571,400 | $2.15 |
| HAMMER TODD B | Conversion of Derivative Security | 2.6.2026 | 6,493 | -7,679 | — |
| North Run Strategic Opportunities Fund I, LP | Open Market Sale | 18.5.2026 | 55,284 | -55,284 | $12.32 |
| HAMMER TODD B | Open Market Sale | 18.5.2026 | 2,934,828 | -55,284 | $12.32 |
| North Run Strategic Opportunities Fund I, LP | Open Market Sale | 14.5.2026 | 165,000 | -165,000 | $12.16 |
| HAMMER TODD B | Open Market Sale | 14.5.2026 | 2,990,112 | -165,000 | $12.16 |
| North Run Strategic Opportunities Fund I, LP | Open Market Sale | 13.5.2026 | 45,000 | -45,000 | $12.29 |
| HAMMER TODD B | Open Market Sale | 13.5.2026 | 3,155,112 | -45,000 | $12.29 |
| North Run Strategic Opportunities Fund I, LP | Open Market Sale | 12.5.2026 | 83,052 | -83,052 | $12.25 |
| HAMMER TODD B | Open Market Sale | 12.5.2026 | 3,200,112 | -83,052 | $12.25 |
| Rubin Shmuel | Open Market Purchase | 27.3.2026 | 180 | +180 | $9.70 |
| Rubin Shmuel | Open Market Purchase | 27.3.2026 | 260,844 | +180 | $9.70 |
| North Run Strategic Opportunities Fund I, LP | Conversion of Derivative Security | 25.3.2026 | 740,000 | +740,000 | $2.15 |
| North Run Strategic Opportunities Fund I, LP | Conversion of Derivative Security | 25.3.2026 | 1,591 | -1,591 | — |
| North Run Strategic Opportunities Fund I, LP | Open Market Sale | 25.3.2026 | 302,352 | -302,352 | $12.31 |
| HAMMER TODD B | Conversion of Derivative Security | 25.3.2026 | 3,585,516 | +740,000 | $2.15 |
| HAMMER TODD B | Open Market Sale | 25.3.2026 | 3,283,164 | -302,352 | $12.31 |
| HAMMER TODD B | Conversion of Derivative Security | 25.3.2026 | 14,172 | -1,591 | — |
| North Run Strategic Opportunities Fund I, LP | Open Market Sale | 24.3.2026 | 54,557 | -54,557 | $12.06 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
11,404,961 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 10,145,630 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
36.6% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 48.1% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology