Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$55.80
▲ $1.11 (+2.0%)
Market data updated: 09/19 03:13 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$54.53 - $56.19
52-Week Range
$29.00 - $107.24
Beta
—
Next Earnings
12.11.2026
Support
$50.28
Resistance
$75.85
LGN is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
+87.8% (1Y)
Strengths: 9/24 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟡 Mixed
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 21.5%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Net margin
Net margin: -2.3% (negative)
Fundamental
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 0 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 0
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
52
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
60
Quality
58
Value
50
Momentum
41
Risk
48
Sentiment
98
Fundamental
37
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Legence Corp. (LGN) highlights its **strong revenue growth** in Q2 2026, with figures doubling year-over-year—though underlying profitability remains challenged by widening margins and losses. Analysts, including Guggenheim, B of A Securities, and Tigress Financial, maintain **optimistic "Buy" ratings**, citing potential AI-driven data center demand and expectations of a 2027 rebound. However, the company reported **$41.08 million in asset impairments**, raising concerns about cost pressures amid growth. Overall, the narrative blends **bullish long-term prospects** with short-term financial caution.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Legence Corp.. News trend score: 98. Reason: 10 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
26
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
41
Psychology
71
Fundamentals
37
Technical
41
Valuation
50
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
-35%
Market Narrative
73
Fundamental Reality
41
Narrative Gap
+32
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for LGN is overwhelmingly consistent with **loss aversion**, as the extreme 3-month drawdown (-36.7%) and subdued volume (0.76x average) signal investors prioritizing damage control over speculative bets. The absence of euphoria, herding, or overconfidence further supports this, as price momentum and fundamentals diverge, and peer performance doesn’t drive action. The key open question is whether the muted volume reflects genuine capitulation or merely cautious positioning ahead of a potential rebound. The narrative gap (8-point difference) hints at a disconnect between investor perceptions and market reality, but the dominant psychological state remains anchored in risk aversion.
Updated: 09/07/2026, 03:37 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Tigress Financial analyst Ivan Feinseth maintains Legence with a Buy and raises the price target from $125 to $130."
"Could Legence (LGN) Be a Major Winner From the AI Data Center Construction Boom?"
"Legence Corp. (NASDAQ:LGN) reported second-quarter results that more than doubled the company’s revenue from a year earlier, but margins and losses widened."
"Legence has proven itself able to capitalize on this tailwind from data center construction with rising EPS."
📈 12D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 81/100
🔴 Weakest match
Thorstein Veblen — 21/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide between methodologies, with some models seeing it as a strong buy while others flag it as risky or overvalued. The highest scorers—Samuel Armstrong Nelson (94), Peter Lynch (81), and Howard Marks (cycle-focused, 80)—view it as either oversold, undervalued, or early-cycle, suggesting a favorable timing or growth opportunity. Meanwhile, the lowest scorers—Jesse Livermore (22) and Thorstein Veblen (21)—reject it outright, citing a negative trend or speculative growth chasing, while Gerald Loeb (33) warns of unacceptable risk. The middle ground, from Fisher (71) to Bogle (42), acknowledges decent fundamentals but lacks the conviction for a strong long-term hold or clear edge over passive investing. The contrast highlights how technical/cycle-based approaches (Nelson, Lynch) contrast sharply with trend-following (Livermore) or value-driven (Graham) frameworks.
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 81
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 77
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 20%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 72
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 71
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 70
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 70
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 63
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 53
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 47
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 45
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 44
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 43
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 43
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 38
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 15%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 33
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 21
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 256 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟡 Indicators are mixed — no clear bias (4 bullish · 6 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
21.0%
Operating Margin
2.4%
Net Margin
-2.3%
EBITDA Margin
6.3%
ROE
-15.2%
ROA
-2.2%
ROIC
—
EPS
—
Cash
$230.17M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
1.57
Debt/Equity
—
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
—
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
—
Not enough data to compute signals.
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 10 positive, 8 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
MT Newswires · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Business Wire · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 4.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 2.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 2.9.2026
MT Newswires · 19.8.2026
Benzinga · 19.8.2026
Insider Monkey · 18.8.2026
Benzinga · 18.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 15.8.2026
Benzinga · 14.8.2026
MT Newswires · 14.8.2026
Benzinga · 14.8.2026
Benzinga · 14.8.2026
Benzinga · 14.8.2026
Motley Fool · 14.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 13.8.2026
Legence Corp. (LGN) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 52/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
LGN currently scores 52/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
LGN's technical score is 41/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 21.5%; Free cash flow growth: 2033.8%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Net margin: -2.3% (negative); ATR: 5.9% of price; Return on equity (ROE): -15.2% (negative).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for LGN.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 8 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crisci Robert | Grant/Award from Employer | 18.8.2026 | 2,257 | +2,257 | — |
| Kelly Christie B. | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.6.2026 | 1,675 | +1,675 | — |
| Keenen Terrence | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.6.2026 | 1,675 | +1,675 | — |
| Coghlan David Joseph | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.6.2026 | 1,675 | +1,675 | — |
| Coghlan David Joseph | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.6.2026 | 5,454 | +1,675 | — |
| Kelly Christie B. | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.6.2026 | 7,032 | +1,675 | — |
| Keenen Terrence | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.6.2026 | 15,960 | +1,675 | — |
| Blackstone EMA III L.L.C. | Conversion of Derivative Security | 9.4.2026 | 9,528,699 | +9,528,699 | — |
| Legence Parent ML LLC | Conversion of Derivative Security | 9.4.2026 | 9,528,699 | -9,528,699 | — |
| Blackstone EMA III L.L.C. | Open Market Sale | 9.4.2026 | 5,865,413 | -5,865,413 | $54.00 |
| Legence Parent ML LLC | Conversion of Derivative Security | 9.4.2026 | 9,528,699 | -9,528,699 | — |
| Legence Parent ML LLC | Open Market Sale | 9.4.2026 | 9,528,699 | -9,528,699 | $54.00 |
| Legence Parent ML LLC | Open Market Sale | 9.4.2026 | 5,865,413 | -5,865,413 | $54.00 |
| Blackstone EMA III L.L.C. | Conversion of Derivative Security | 9.4.2026 | 9,528,699 | -9,528,699 | — |
| Legence Parent ML LLC | Conversion of Derivative Security | 9.4.2026 | 9,528,699 | +9,528,699 | — |
| Blackstone EMA III L.L.C. | Open Market Sale | 9.4.2026 | 9,528,699 | -9,528,699 | $54.00 |
| Blackstone EMA III L.L.C. | Conversion of Derivative Security | 9.4.2026 | 9,528,699 | -9,528,699 | — |
| SCHWARZMAN STEPHEN A | Conversion of Derivative Security | 9.4.2026 | 9,707,270 | +9,528,699 | — |
| SCHWARZMAN STEPHEN A | Open Market Sale | 9.4.2026 | 178,571 | -9,528,699 | $54.00 |
| SCHWARZMAN STEPHEN A | Open Market Sale | 9.4.2026 | 19,297,381 | -5,865,413 | $54.00 |
| SCHWARZMAN STEPHEN A | Conversion of Derivative Security | 9.4.2026 | 31,171,134 | -9,528,699 | — |
| LEGENCE PARENT LLC | Conversion of Derivative Security | 9.4.2026 | 9,707,270 | +9,528,699 | — |
| LEGENCE PARENT LLC | Open Market Sale | 9.4.2026 | 178,571 | -9,528,699 | $54.00 |
| LEGENCE PARENT LLC | Open Market Sale | 9.4.2026 | 19,297,381 | -5,865,413 | $54.00 |
| LEGENCE PARENT LLC | Conversion of Derivative Security | 9.4.2026 | 31,171,134 | -9,528,699 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
3,226,729 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 4,237,310 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
55.8% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 53.6% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology