Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Telecommunications · ·
$35.99
▲ $0.00 (+0.0%)
Market data updated: 09/19 11:20 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/01/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$35.99 - $35.99
52-Week Range
—
Beta
—
Next Earnings
03.11.2026
Support
$26.14
Resistance
$39.39
-41.0% (1Y)
Strengths: 14/27 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is stable or improving over time
Quality
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 4.5% of price
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 1 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 1
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
52
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
44
Quality
63
Value
60
Momentum
62
Risk
32
Sentiment
20
Fundamental
56
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Liberty Broadband Corporation has centered on its acquisition by Charter Communications, which concluded in August 2026 following the completion of the Charter-Cox merger. The focus includes the conversion of Liberty Broadband preferred shares into Charter preferreds, the company’s Q2 2026 earnings call—highlighting a new dividend policy—and comparisons with Charter’s strategic moves, such as its Cox deal, which may position it competitively against rivals like Comcast.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Liberty Broadband Corporation. News trend score: 20. Reason: 7 of the last 12 articles are negative, versus 2 positive.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
20
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
54
Psychology
23
Fundamentals
56
Technical
62
Valuation
60
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+6%
Market Narrative
32
Fundamental Reality
54
Narrative Gap
-22
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
Market behavior suggests a tug-of-war between speculative interest (FOMO) and cautious distress (Panic Selling), both fueled by elevated volume but neutral momentum. The anchoring score hints at traders weighing recent resistance, while the narrative gap (-20) implies reality may be diverging from market expectations. The key question is whether volume reflects genuine conviction or liquidation pressure, given the lack of volatility spikes. Without a dominant state, the market appears in a state of indecision, balancing speculative and defensive impulses.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 01:20 PM
👥 What the crowd believes
"Liberty Broadband Preferreds convert to Charter preferreds in Aug 2026 after Charter–Cox closes."
"Charter Communications Completes Liberty Broadband Acquisition, Cox Transaction"
"Liberty Broadband Corp (LBRDA) Q2 2026 Earnings Call Highlights: New Dividend Policy"
📈 10D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 92/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 27/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among methodologies, with the highest scores from Charles Mackay (92) and Philip Fisher (89) suggesting it avoids crowd-driven frenzy and meets Fisher’s rigorous quality benchmarks, respectively. Meanwhile, Lynch’s lower score (84) hints at insufficient growth data to justify his ‘tenbagger’ criteria, while Marks and Graham’s mid-range verdicts (70 and 69) indicate mixed signals—neither a slam dunk nor a clear pass. On the opposite end, the lowest scores—from Loeb (30) and Bagehot (28)—flag severe risks like capital erosion and liquidity concerns, aligning with their conservative, crisis-aware frameworks. The contrast between Fisher’s enthusiasm and Livermore’s (35) outright trend opposition underscores how the stock’s volatility and speculative traits clash with some approaches while resonating with others focused on quality or cycle positioning.
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 92
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 89
Exceptional company quality by Fisher's standards
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 84
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 72
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 69
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 69
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 62
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 52
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 44
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 41
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 39
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 39
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 36
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 30
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 28
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 27
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 261 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (6 bullish · 3 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
99.4%
Operating Margin
5.9%
Net Margin
85.5%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
8.9%
ROA
5.2%
ROIC
—
EPS
—
Cash
$57.00M
Total Debt
$1.75B
Current Ratio
0.10
Debt/Equity
0.34
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$39.71
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$61.35
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 2 positive, 3 neutral, 7 negative out of the last 12 articles.
PR Newswire · 15.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 27.8.2026
MT Newswires · 20.8.2026
PR Newswire · 20.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 20.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 6.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 6.8.2026
Associated Press · 30.7.2026
Associated Press · 30.7.2026
Business Wire · 14.7.2026
The Wall Street Journal · 29.6.2026
Investing.com · 29.6.2026
Liberty Broadband Corporation (LBRDA) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 52/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
LBRDA currently scores 52/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
LBRDA's technical score is 62/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Debt/equity: 0.34; Price is above the 50-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 4.5% of price; Current ratio: 0.10; Calmar: -0.39 (3y annualized return -27.6% / max drawdown 70.7%).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for LBRDA.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wilm Renee L | Disposition to the Company | 19.8.2026 | 19,445 | -19,445 | — |
| Wilm Renee L | Disposition to the Company | 19.8.2026 | 5,227 | -5,227 | — |
| Wilm Renee L | Disposition to the Company | 19.8.2026 | 8,138 | -8,138 | — |
| Wendling Brian J | Disposition to the Company | 19.8.2026 | 35,383 | -35,383 | — |
| Wendling Brian J | Disposition to the Company | 19.8.2026 | 18,277 | -18,277 | — |
| Wendling Brian J | Disposition to the Company | 19.8.2026 | 12,098 | -12,098 | — |
| Wendling Brian J | Disposition to the Company | 19.8.2026 | 10,746 | -10,746 | — |
| Wilm Renee L | Disposition to the Company | 19.8.2026 | 23,606 | -23,606 | — |
| Wilm Renee L | Disposition to the Company | 19.8.2026 | 63,917 | -63,917 | — |
| Wilm Renee L | Disposition to the Company | 19.8.2026 | 26,989 | -26,989 | — |
| Wendling Brian J | Disposition to the Company | 19.8.2026 | 16,732 | -16,732 | — |
| Wendling Brian J | Disposition to the Company | 19.8.2026 | 15,518 | -15,518 | — |
| Wilm Renee L | Disposition to the Company | 19.8.2026 | 12,312 | -12,312 | — |
| Patterson Martin Edward | Disposition to the Company | 19.8.2026 | 12,085 | -12,085 | — |
| Patterson Martin Edward | Disposition to the Company | 19.8.2026 | 8,159 | -8,159 | — |
| Patterson Martin Edward | Disposition to the Company | 19.8.2026 | 3,428 | -3,428 | — |
| Patterson Martin Edward | Disposition to the Company | 19.8.2026 | 3,804 | -3,804 | — |
| Patterson Martin Edward | Disposition to the Company | 19.8.2026 | 4,688 | -4,688 | — |
| ENGLES GREGG L | Disposition to the Company | 19.8.2026 | 4,494 | -4,494 | — |
| Green Richard R | Disposition to the Company | 19.8.2026 | 634 | -634 | — |
| Green Richard R | Disposition to the Company | 19.8.2026 | 7,301 | -7,301 | — |
| ENGLES GREGG L | Disposition to the Company | 19.8.2026 | 3,949 | -3,949 | — |
| Patterson Martin Edward | Disposition to the Company | 19.8.2026 | 270 | -270 | — |
| Patterson Martin Edward | Disposition to the Company | 19.8.2026 | 225 | -225 | — |
| ENGLES GREGG L | Disposition to the Company | 19.8.2026 | 4,637 | -4,637 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
574,193 shares short as of 2026-07-31 · vs. 528,917 on 2026-07-15
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
57.3% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 66.5% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology