Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Industrials · ·
$64.29
▼ $0.64 (-1.0%)
Market data updated: 09/29 10:56 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/29/2026
News analyzed: 09/29/2026
Market Cap
$3.51B
Day Range
$63.77 - $64.78
52-Week Range
$56.19 - $88.96
Beta
—
Next Earnings
02.11.2026
Support
$63.55
Resistance
$88.96
KTB is a stock from the Industrials sector — Manufacturing, aerospace, defense, and infrastructure — closely tied to capital-investment cycles and economic growth.
-17.7% (1Y)
Strengths: 9/31 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $115.83 vs. price $64.29 (+80.2%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 0.31 (3y annualized return 14.2% / max drawdown 45.4%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
51
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
54
Quality
58
Value
62
Momentum
19
Risk
42
Sentiment
74
Fundamental
67
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Kontoor Brands, Inc. has centered on its ambitious growth strategy for Helly Hansen, a key subsidiary. The company announced targets of $1.1 billion in revenue by 2030, mid-teens profit margins, and $500 million in cash flow, driven by accelerated U.S. expansion and broader international growth. Analysts and investor discussions also highlighted Helly Hansen’s potential as a core North American growth engine, alongside broader industry trends in consumer stocks and AI-driven customer experience strategies.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Kontoor Brands, Inc.. News trend score: 74. Reason: 7 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
13
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
41
Psychology
70
Fundamentals
67
Technical
19
Valuation
62
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
-22%
Market Narrative
38
Fundamental Reality
41
Narrative Gap
-3
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for KTB suggests a lack of dominant psychological state, with no single bias overwhelmingly driving action. The anchoring score (21) stands out, as the stock’s proximity to support (3.9%) may be reinforcing reluctance to sell. Meanwhile, euphoria (15) is muted by the stock’s deep discount (-36% vs. DCF) and negative momentum, while panic selling (26) is dampened by stable volatility and high sentiment. The key open question: *Will traders prioritize technical support or fundamental undervaluation?*
Updated: 09/04/2026, 08:41 PM
👥 What the crowd believes
"$1.1B Helly Hansen revenue target by 2030"
"Turning Helly Hansen into its core North America growth engine"
"Mid-teens profit margins by 2030"
"U.S. expansion accelerates"
📈 4D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 93/100
🔴 Weakest match
Walter Bagehot — 23/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among historical methodologies, with scores ranging from a near-bullish 94 under Samuel Armstrong Nelson’s cycle-based approach—who sees it as oversold and poised for a rebound—to a resounding 16 under Jesse Livermore’s trend-following rules, which flag it as outright negative. Meanwhile, value-focused investors like Benjamin Graham and his Enterprising Investor variant (scores of 43 and 35, respectively) dismiss it as statistically overpriced, while growth-oriented thinkers such as Peter Lynch (37) and Thorstein Veblen (36) reject it for lacking sustainable momentum or being driven by speculative excess. The middle ground is occupied by pragmatists like Philip Fisher (68) and Howard Marks (53–62), who acknowledge its strengths but temper enthusiasm with concerns over inflated expectations or cyclical positioning, illustrating how even moderately bullish signals are tempered by broader market or structural risks.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 93
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 88
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 82
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 69
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 69
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 68
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 63
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 49
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 42
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 40
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 37
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 36
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 36
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 33
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 31
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 23
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 286 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 10 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
45.2%
Operating Margin
10.7%
Net Margin
7.2%
EBITDA Margin
12.2%
ROE
40.3%
ROA
8.8%
ROIC
—
EPS
$4.10
Cash
$108.44M
Total Debt
$1.14B
Current Ratio
1.82
Debt/Equity
2.02
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 8.9.2026 | $0.530 |
| 8.6.2026 | $0.530 |
| 7.6.2026 | $0.530 |
| 10.3.2026 | $0.530 |
| 9.3.2026 | $0.530 |
| 8.12.2025 | $0.530 |
| 7.12.2025 | $0.530 |
| 9.9.2025 | $0.520 |
| 8.9.2025 | $0.520 |
| 10.6.2025 | $0.520 |
| 9.6.2025 | $0.520 |
| 10.3.2025 | $0.520 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$64.29
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$115.83
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+80.2%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
6.7%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.7% | $463.73M | $425.44M |
| 2 | 5.6% | $489.80M | $412.26M |
| 3 | 4.6% | $512.24M | $395.55M |
| 4 | 3.5% | $530.38M | $375.73M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $543.64M | $353.33M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$434.76M
Terminal Value
$8.57B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$5.57B
Enterprise Value
$7.53B
Net Debt
$1.03B
Equity Value
$6.50B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$10.07
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$7.43
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 7 positive, 10 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 28.9.2026
Yahoo · 26.9.2026
Yahoo · 23.9.2026
Yahoo · 23.9.2026
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
Yahoo · 20.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
Footwear News · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Zacks · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
Kontoor Brands, Inc. (KTB) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 51/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
KTB currently scores 51/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, KTB's estimated fair value is $115.83, which is 80.2% above the current price of $64.29. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
KTB's technical score is 19/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $115.83 vs. price $64.29 (+80.2%); Revenue growth (last year): 20.9%; Free cash flow growth: 24.4%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 0.31 (3y annualized return 14.2% / max drawdown 45.4%); Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -7.1%; Net income growth: -7.5%.
Yes — KTB has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 8 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skipworth Michael | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.9.2026 | 1,611 | +1,611 | — |
| Taylor Andrew Lyn | Tax Withholding in Shares | 21.9.2026 | 3,832 | -68 | $66.70 |
| ALKIRE JOSEPH A | Tax Withholding in Shares | 21.9.2026 | 54,275 | -872 | $66.70 |
| Baxter Scott H | Gift | 14.8.2026 | 210 | -56,160 | — |
| Baxter Scott H | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.8.2026 | 317,946 | +56,160 | — |
| Kidd Peter A. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 14.8.2026 | 25,054 | -580 | $84.26 |
| Kidd Peter A. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 14.8.2026 | 580 | -580 | $84.26 |
| Baxter Scott H | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.8.2026 | 56,160 | +56,160 | — |
| Baxter Scott H | Gift | 14.8.2026 | 56,160 | -56,160 | — |
| Baxter Scott H | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 13.8.2026 | 446,189 | +184,403 | $22.04 |
| Baxter Scott H | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 13.8.2026 | 0 | -184,403 | — |
| Baxter Scott H | Open Market Sale | 13.8.2026 | 329,317 | -116,872 | $82.99 |
| Baxter Scott H | Open Market Sale | 13.8.2026 | 261,786 | -67,531 | $84.09 |
| Baxter Scott H | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 13.8.2026 | 446,189 | +184,403 | $22.04 |
| Baxter Scott H | Open Market Sale | 13.8.2026 | 329,317 | -116,872 | $82.99 |
| Baxter Scott H | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 13.8.2026 | 0 | -184,403 | — |
| Baxter Scott H | Open Market Sale | 13.8.2026 | 261,786 | -67,531 | $84.09 |
| Doerr Thomas L Jr | Open Market Sale | 13.8.2026 | 7,660.115 | -7,660.115 | $83.43 |
| Baxter Scott H | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 13.8.2026 | 184,403 | -184,403 | — |
| Baxter Scott H | Open Market Sale | 13.8.2026 | 67,531 | -67,531 | $84.09 |
| Baxter Scott H | Open Market Sale | 13.8.2026 | 116,872 | -116,872 | $82.99 |
| Baxter Scott H | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 13.8.2026 | 184,403 | +184,403 | $22.04 |
| Doerr Thomas L Jr | Open Market Sale | 13.8.2026 | 25,063 | -7,660 | $83.43 |
| Waldron Thomas E. | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.7.2026 | 1,471 | +1,471 | — |
| Waldron Thomas E. | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.7.2026 | 87,020 | +1,471 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
6,144,365 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 5,664,331 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
63.4% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 68.6% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology