Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$4.94
▲ $0.20 (+4.2%)
Market data updated: 09/23 05:04 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/23/2026
News analyzed: 09/23/2026
Market Cap
$918.21M
Day Range
$4.62 - $4.96
52-Week Range
$1.81 - $6.61
Beta
—
Next Earnings
10.11.2026
Support
$3.15
Resistance
$5.53
KOPN is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
+80.3% (1Y)
Strengths: 15/28 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 51.5%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$1.66 vs. price $4.94 (-133.6%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (68/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (33/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
62
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
68
Quality
42
Value
33
Momentum
85
Risk
48
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
47
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Kopin Corporation highlights its strategic expansion into defense and AI-driven sectors. The company secured a $2.4 million order for OLED microdisplays tied to a thermal weapon sight program, reinforcing its military focus. Additionally, Kopin is advancing microLED applications for defense drones and AI data center optical interconnects, with partnerships like Fabric.AI’s Neural I/O™ initiative—led by CEO Michael Murray—expanding its role in AI infrastructure. Analysts also note positive momentum in first-person view (FPV) drone technology, boosting stock valuations.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Kopin Corporation. News trend score: 100. Reason: 10 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
54
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
51
Psychology
60
Fundamentals
47
Technical
85
Valuation
33
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
+20%
Market Narrative
79
Fundamental Reality
51
Narrative Gap
+28
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
Market behavior suggests herding dominates, as KOPN’s outperformance today (+4.9%) mirrors peer gains (+3.3%), implying passive alignment rather than independent conviction. The narrative gap (4 points) hints at a slight disconnect between sentiment (optimistic) and technicals (neutral momentum, moderate volatility), but euphoria remains muted. The absence of panic or overconfidence signals disciplined participation, though the stock’s slight outperformance may attract further tailwind chasers. Key question: Will the outperformance sustain, or will volume rise if momentum shifts?
Updated: 09/08/2026, 04:28 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Kopin Secures $2.4M Order for OLED Microdisplays for International Thermal Weapon Sight Program"
"accelerates military microLED wins and targets AI data center optical interconnect growth"
"Joint Steering Committee Led by Kopin CEO Michael Murray as Neural I/o™ Industry Engagement Expands"
"Kopin (KOPN) Stock Sees Fair Value Lift After Higher Analyst Targets On FPV Outlook"
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 92/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for KOPN reflects a clash between defensive, cyclical, and contrarian perspectives. Walter Bagehot’s near-perfect score highlights the stock’s resilience in liquidity crises, suggesting it could weather downturns, while Samuel Armstrong Nelson’s mid-range score leans on its cyclical positioning, seeing it as undervalued relative to its historical range. In contrast, Fisher, Lynch, and Marks all flag the stock as overpriced or lacking exceptional quality, with Fisher’s lower score emphasizing its failure to meet his bar for truly outstanding businesses. Meanwhile, Graham’s methodologies—both strict and enterprising—reject it outright, citing valuation and defensive metrics, while Morgan Housel’s zero score underscores its volatility as a red flag for patient, long-term investors. The contrast between Bagehot’s liquidity focus and the rest’s valuation or growth skepticism underscores whether KOPN is a niche defensive play or a speculative bet.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 92
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 63
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 53
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 50
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 49
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 48
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 47
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 43
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🔴 26
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 26
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 25
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 24
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 13
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 13
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 283 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (9 bullish · 1 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
-643.9%
Net Margin
170.3%
EBITDA Margin
-589.7%
ROE
4.1%
ROA
2.4%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.01
Cash
$36.40M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
2.70
Debt/Equity
—
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$4.94
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$1.66
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-133.6%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
6.1%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.1% | $-18.02M | $-16.53M |
| 2 | 5.2% | $-18.96M | $-15.95M |
| 3 | 4.3% | $-19.77M | $-15.27M |
| 4 | 3.4% | $-20.45M | $-14.49M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-20.96M | $-13.62M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-16.98M
Terminal Value
$-330.49M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-214.80M
Enterprise Value
$-290.66M
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$-290.66M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$0.37
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$0.37
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 10 positive, 10 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
MT Newswires · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
Business Wire · 8.9.2026
Benzinga · 8.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 27.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 19.8.2026
Yahoo · 18.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 18.8.2026
MarketBeat · 15.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 12.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 12.8.2026
Moby · 12.8.2026
Zacks · 11.8.2026
MT Newswires · 11.8.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 11.8.2026
ChartMill · 11.8.2026
InvestorsHub · 11.8.2026
Kopin Corporation (KOPN) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 62/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
KOPN currently scores 62/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, KOPN's estimated fair value is -$1.66, which is 133.6% below the current price of $4.94. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
KOPN's technical score is 85/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 51.5%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 103.0%; Net income growth: 105.9%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$1.66 vs. price $4.94 (-133.6%); Operating margin: -643.9% (negative); Operating margin is eroding over time.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for KOPN.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 16 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIEUWSMA DAVID J | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 64,500 | +64,500 | — |
| Avery Jill Janice | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 64,500 | +64,500 | — |
| SEIF MARGARET K | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 64,500 | +64,500 | — |
| Walsh Paul V Jr | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 64,500 | +64,500 | — |
| SEIF MARGARET K | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 193,500 | +64,500 | — |
| Walsh Paul V Jr | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 193,500 | +64,500 | — |
| NIEUWSMA DAVID J | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 258,000 | +64,500 | — |
| Avery Jill Janice | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 223,500 | +64,500 | — |
| Baker Paul Christopher | Open Market Sale | 6.5.2026 | 58,939 | -58,939 | $4.90 |
| Baker Paul Christopher | Open Market Sale | 6.5.2026 | 420,025 | -58,939 | $4.90 |
| Baker Paul Christopher | Open Market Sale | 5.5.2026 | 1,041 | -1,041 | $4.90 |
| Baker Paul Christopher | Open Market Sale | 5.5.2026 | 478,964 | -1,041 | $4.90 |
| Baker Paul Christopher | Open Market Sale | 28.4.2026 | 116,860 | -116,860 | $3.95 |
| Baker Paul Christopher | Open Market Sale | 28.4.2026 | 480,005 | -116,860 | $3.95 |
| Murray Michael Andrew | Open Market Sale | 17.4.2026 | 96,800 | -96,800 | $3.01 |
| Murray Michael Andrew | Open Market Sale | 17.4.2026 | 2,771,122 | -96,800 | $3.01 |
| Murray Michael Andrew | Open Market Sale | 15.4.2026 | 63,200 | -63,200 | $3.01 |
| Murray Michael Andrew | Open Market Sale | 15.4.2026 | 2,867,922 | -63,200 | $3.01 |
| Murray Michael Andrew | Open Market Sale | 13.4.2026 | 187,920 | -187,920 | $2.80 |
| Murray Michael Andrew | Open Market Sale | 13.4.2026 | 2,931,122 | -187,920 | $2.80 |
| Murray Michael Andrew | Open Market Sale | 26.3.2026 | 5,413 | -5,413 | $2.25 |
| Murray Michael Andrew | Open Market Sale | 26.3.2026 | 3,119,042 | -5,413 | $2.25 |
| Murray Michael Andrew | Open Market Sale | 25.3.2026 | 33,334 | -33,334 | $2.32 |
| Murray Michael Andrew | Open Market Sale | 25.3.2026 | 3,124,455 | -33,334 | $2.32 |
| Baker Paul Christopher | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.1.2026 | 72,000 | +72,000 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
26,528,216 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 27,141,585 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
54.2% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 61.7% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology