Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· ·
$13.80
▼ $0.14 (-1.0%)
Market data updated: 09/19 10:58 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$5.21B
Day Range
$13.74 - $14.02
52-Week Range
$12.06 - $44.75
Beta
—
Next Earnings
09.11.2026
Support
$13.47
Resistance
$20.99
-69.3% (1Y)
Strengths: 3/27 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Liquidity risk
Current ratio: 8.81
Risk
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$52.09 vs. price $13.80 (-477.5%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 0 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 0
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
36
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
32
Quality
50
Value
38
Momentum
22
Risk
40
Sentiment
74
Fundamental
30
Institutional
100
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Klarna Group plc has focused on its strategic expansions and partnerships. Notably, the company announced a collaboration with NordVPN, offering its premium members enhanced online privacy and security as part of their membership. Additionally, Scotiabank initiated coverage with a "Sector Perform" rating and set a $16 price target, reflecting cautious optimism. While broader industry trends—such as competition among BNPL providers like PayPal and Affirm—were discussed, Klarna’s specific operational updates remained limited to this partnership.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Klarna Group plc. News trend score: 74. Reason: 8 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 4 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
14
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
100
Fundamentals
30
Technical
22
Valuation
38
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
-27%
Market Narrative
50
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+0
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
KLAR’s dominant **overconfidence** (100) stems from a disconnect between price performance (-2.2% momentum) and severe earnings contraction (-80% EPS growth), implying traders may overvalue fundamentals or ignore deterioration. The **anchoring** (21) and **loss aversion** (39) signals suggest traders are hesitant to exit near support (4.0% above), possibly due to reluctance to realize losses. Meanwhile, **FOMO** and **euphoria** are suppressed by weak momentum and below-average price levels. The key question is whether traders will sustain overconfidence despite worsening fundamentals or if loss aversion will force a re-evaluation as support tests approach.
Updated: 09/08/2026, 04:02 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Scotiabank initiates coverage on Klarna (NYSE:KLAR) with a Sector Perform rating and announces Price Target of $16"
"Klarna Premium and Max members can now access NordVPN as part of their existing membership, bringing online privacy and security"
📈 18D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 96/100
🔴 Weakest match
Philip Fisher — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide between methodologies rooted in macroeconomic resilience and those focused on fundamental value or growth. The highest-scoring approaches—from Mackay’s crowd psychology, Bagehot’s liquidity focus, and Nelson’s cycle analysis—all suggest KLAR avoids speculative bubbles or liquidity traps, positioning it favorably in broader market conditions. Conversely, value-oriented investors like Graham and Loeb see red flags, with Graham’s strict tests failing and Loeb flagging moderate capital risk, while Fisher’s zero score underscores a complete lack of the qualitative traits he prized. Meanwhile, passive or contrarian thinkers like Malkiel/Bogle and Livermore dismiss it outright, either because it doesn’t fit an index strategy or because it violates trend-following discipline. The contrast highlights how macro-driven and cyclical frameworks lean bullish, while deep-value and growth-focused ones remain skeptical.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 96
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 91
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 87
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 86
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 69
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 63
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 61
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 53
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 44
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 44
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 43
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 33
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 30
Weak case — Malkiel/Bogle would say a low-cost index is the simpler bet
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 22
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 20
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 0
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 258 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 9 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
-6.6%
Net Margin
-8.4%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
-11.7%
ROA
-1.6%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$0.79
Cash
$3.80B
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
8.81
Debt/Equity
0.57
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$13.80
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$52.09
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-477.5%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
10.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.0% | $-1.14B | $-1.04B |
| 2 | 8.1% | $-1.23B | $-1.04B |
| 3 | 6.3% | $-1.31B | $-1.01B |
| 4 | 4.4% | $-1.37B | $-967.12M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-1.40B | $-909.44M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-1.03B
Terminal Value
$-22.07B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-14.34B
Enterprise Value
$-19.31B
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$-19.31B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$6.64
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$5.63
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 8 positive, 8 neutral, 4 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Fortune · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Payments Dive · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
PR Newswire · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Zacks · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 10.9.2026
Benzinga · 10.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Entrepreneur · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Barrons.com · 9.9.2026
Klarna Group plc (KLAR) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 36/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
KLAR currently scores 36/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, KLAR's estimated fair value is -$52.09, which is 477.5% below the current price of $13.80. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
KLAR's technical score is 22/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Current ratio: 8.81; MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum; Current ratio: 8.81.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$52.09 vs. price $13.80 (-477.5%); Operating margin: -6.6% (negative); Net margin: -8.4% (negative).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for KLAR.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 2 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Siemiatkowski Sebastian | Open Market Purchase | 26.8.2026 | 25,344,322 | +692,506 | $14.37 |
| Siemiatkowski Sebastian | Open Market Purchase | 26.8.2026 | 692,506 | +692,506 | $14.37 |
| Shaer Yaron | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 13,655 | +13,655 | — |
| Neglen Niclas | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 15,944 | +15,944 | — |
| Greenway Anthony | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 1,076 | +1,076 | — |
| Sandstrom David | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 13,655 | +13,655 | — |
| Sykes David | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 17,943 | +17,943 | — |
| Sandstrom David | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 36,120 | +13,655 | — |
| Shaer Yaron | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 36,107 | +13,655 | — |
| Sykes David | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 181,400 | +17,943 | — |
| Greenway Anthony | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 9,375 | +1,076 | — |
| Neglen Niclas | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 86,673 | +15,944 | — |
| Giesecke Camilla | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 84,034 | +84,034 | — |
| Siemiatkowski Sebastian | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 1,166,563 | +1,166,563 | — |
| Fock David | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 84,034 | +84,034 | — |
| Giesecke Camilla | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 1,949,033 | +84,034 | — |
| Fock David | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.5.2026 | 69 | +69 | — |
| Greenway Anthony | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.5.2026 | 526 | +526 | — |
| Shaer Yaron | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.5.2026 | 48 | +48 | — |
| Sykes David | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.5.2026 | 238 | +238 | — |
| Sandstrom David | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.5.2026 | 61 | +61 | — |
| Neglen Niclas | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.5.2026 | 127 | +127 | — |
| Giesecke Camilla | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.5.2026 | 41 | +41 | — |
| Sandstrom David | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.5.2026 | 22,465 | +61 | — |
| Shaer Yaron | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.5.2026 | 22,452 | +48 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
35,070,875 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 32,760,454 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
40.7% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 42.1% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology