Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· ·
$6.25
▼ $0.16 (-2.5%)
Market data updated: 09/29 04:14 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/28/2026
News analyzed: 09/29/2026
Market Cap
$672.75M
Day Range
$6.15 - $6.35
52-Week Range
$6.15 - $9.50
Beta
—
Next Earnings
28.10.2026
Support
$6.15
Resistance
$8.15
-16.1% (1Y)
Strengths: 4/19 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 103.1%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: -0.38 (3y annualized return -14.1% / max drawdown 37.5%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
47
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
66
Quality
No data available
Value
60
Momentum
6
Risk
42
Sentiment
92
Fundamental
51
Institutional
67
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc. (IVR) has primarily focused on its status as a high-yield real estate investment trust (REIT) with a growing mortgage-backed securities (MBS) portfolio, attracting income-focused investors. Headlines highlight its stock performance, including a slight uptick despite broader market declines, and comparisons to peers with similarly high yields. The broader context also includes discussions on the risks and trends of monthly dividend stocks, emphasizing volatility and the importance of yield quality over nominal rates.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about INVESCO MORTGAGE CAPITAL INC. News trend score: 92. Reason: 11 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 4 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
29
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
65
Fundamentals
51
Technical
6
Valuation
60
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
-21%
Market Narrative
50
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+0
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant anchoring behavior (58) suggests traders are fixated on the 2.1% proximity to support, possibly due to recent price action or a reference level. While FOMO and euphoria scores are elevated by extreme sentiment (98/100), the negative momentum (-5.0% ROC) and below-200MA (-8.9%) dampen speculative enthusiasm. The narrative gap (8-point divergence) hints at a disconnect between market perception (optimistic) and technical reality (neutral/negative). The key question: *Will traders break free from the support anchor, or will the gap widen as sentiment remains detached from price action?*
Updated: 09/06/2026, 04:53 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Invesco Mortgage Capital (IVR) reached $7.2... reflecting a +1.41% change"
"Invesco Mortgage Capital Remains A High-Yield REIT Idea, As MBS Portfolio Grows"
"frequent payouts can obscure volatility and weak total returns"
"Avoid reaching for the highest nominal yield when it is fueled by dilutive capital raises"
📈 3D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Benjamin Graham — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 28/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a stark contrast between value-focused and growth-oriented methodologies. Benjamin Graham’s defensive and enterprising frameworks both rate it near-perfectly, seeing it as a statistically discounted bargain or a high-conviction opportunity, while Peter Lynch’s growth lens also scores it maximally, suggesting the market hasn’t yet priced in its potential. Meanwhile, methodologies like Howard Marks (who balances business quality with market expectations) and Gerald Loeb (who weighs risk tolerance) downgrade it slightly, hinting at either overpriced growth or moderate capital risk. The divide widens further with Jesse Livermore’s low score—his strict trend-following rules flag it as a negative setup—while cyclical and market-neutral approaches (Nelson, Marks-Cycle) remain cautiously optimistic. Even Fisher and Bagehot’s neutral scores stem from insufficient data, underscoring how this stock’s appeal hinges on the investor’s core philosophy: value hunters see a bargain, growth seekers a laggard, and contrarians a potential mispricing.
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 100
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 100
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 99
Deep statistical discount — a real Enterprising Investor candidate
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 98
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 79
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 77
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 76
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 70
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 56
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 53
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 50
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 49
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 28
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 286 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 11 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
—
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
12.7%
ROA
1.6%
ROIC
—
EPS
$1.32
Cash
$56.04M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
—
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 25.8.2026 | $0.120 |
| 27.7.2026 | $0.120 |
| 26.7.2026 | $0.120 |
| 23.6.2026 | $0.120 |
| 22.6.2026 | $0.120 |
| 26.5.2026 | $0.120 |
| 25.5.2026 | $0.120 |
| 27.4.2026 | $0.120 |
| 26.4.2026 | $0.120 |
| 24.3.2026 | $0.120 |
| 23.3.2026 | $0.120 |
| 24.2.2026 | $0.120 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$11.92
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$11.92
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 11 positive, 5 neutral, 4 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 24.9.2026
Yahoo · 23.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 22.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 6.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Zacks · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 31.8.2026
Barrons.com · 31.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 29.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 27.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 26.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 20.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 20.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 20.8.2026
Yahoo · 19.8.2026
INVESCO MORTGAGE CAPITAL INC (IVR) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 47/100, rated "Moderate" (a partial score — based on only 6 of 7 categories, some data is currently unavailable). The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
IVR currently scores 47/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure (a partial score — based on only 6 of 7 categories, some data is currently unavailable). StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
IVR's technical score is 6/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 103.1%; Net income growth: 69.1%; NAV per share: $11.92.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: -0.38 (3y annualized return -14.1% / max drawdown 37.5%); Price is below the 50-day average; Price is below the 200-day average.
Yes — IVR has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 4 purchases and 2 sales out of the last 24 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Graham Peter M | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.8.2026 | 10,653 | +10,653 | — |
| Graham Peter M | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.8.2026 | 10,653 | +10,653 | — |
| Kelley Katharine | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2026 | 13,157 | +13,157 | — |
| Fleshman Robert L | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2026 | 13,157 | +13,157 | — |
| McMullan Wes | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2026 | 13,157 | +13,157 | — |
| Day John | Disposition to the Company | 15.5.2026 | 5,026 | -5,026 | — |
| LIU DON H | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2026 | 13,157 | +13,157 | — |
| LIU DON H | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2026 | 52,243 | +13,157 | — |
| Day John | Disposition to the Company | 15.5.2026 | 39,568 | -5,026 | — |
| Kelley Katharine | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2026 | 47,400 | +13,157 | — |
| McMullan Wes | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2026 | 35,391 | +13,157 | — |
| Fleshman Robert L | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2026 | 32,415 | +13,157 | — |
| Gregson Mark William | Open Market Purchase | 5.5.2026 | 1,750 | +1,750 | $8.03 |
| Gregson Mark William | Open Market Purchase | 5.5.2026 | 1,750 | +1,750 | $8.03 |
| Waldner Robert | Open Market Purchase | 27.2.2026 | 1,000 | +1,000 | $8.45 |
| Waldner Robert | Open Market Purchase | 27.2.2026 | 1,000 | +1,000 | $8.45 |
| Fleshman Robert L | Open Market Sale | 10.11.2025 | 2,000 | -2,000 | $24.72 |
| Fleshman Robert L | Open Market Sale | 10.11.2025 | 0 | -2,000 | $24.72 |
| Kelley Katharine | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2025 | 13,689 | +13,689 | — |
| LIU DON H | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2025 | 13,689 | +13,689 | — |
| McMullan Wes | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2025 | 13,689 | +13,689 | — |
| Handlon Carolyn B | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2025 | 13,689 | +13,689 | — |
| Day John | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2025 | 13,689 | +13,689 | — |
| Fleshman Robert L | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2025 | 13,689 | +13,689 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
10,389,416 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 8,853,209 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
69.4% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 61.6% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology