Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Staples · ·
$2.76
▼ $0.10 (-3.5%)
Market data updated: 09/21 06:03 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/21/2026
Market Cap
$1.89M
Day Range
$2.76 - $3.18
52-Week Range
⚠️ Data anomaly
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
Support
$1.54
Resistance
$25.34
IPST is a stock from the Consumer Defensive sector — Food, beverages, and household products — steady demand even in a recession, since these are essential consumer goods.
-98.6% (1Y)
Strengths: 6/31 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 20.4%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin
Operating margin: -1307.1% (negative)
Fundamental
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
39
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
3d ago · $2.67
Evidence: Narrative Gap moved from 66 to 11 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
54
Quality
47
Value
50
Momentum
7
Risk
32
Sentiment
92
Fundamental
30
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of IP Strategy Holdings, Inc. has centered on regulatory scrutiny and market volatility. The company received a warning from Nasdaq in late August 2026 for missing its quarterly Form 10-Q filing deadline, prompting official notification. Additionally, its stock experienced notable after-hours gains of 11.67% on August 27, drawing attention amid broader market activity reports. The focus remains on compliance and trading activity rather than operational updates.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about IP Strategy Holdings, Inc.. News trend score: 92. Reason: 11 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 4 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
31
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
38
Psychology
71
Fundamentals
30
Technical
7
Valuation
50
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
-20%
Market Narrative
49
Fundamental Reality
38
Narrative Gap
+11
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests a dominant panic selling state, driven by extreme volatility and a steep price decline, despite positive news sentiment. The narrative gap (11 points) indicates a disconnect between optimistic expectations and harsh reality, fueling urgency. Herding is minimal, and euphoria is absent, as price momentum contradicts sentiment. The key question: will volatility subside or escalate as traders reassess fundamentals?
Updated: 09/05/2026, 01:50 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"received a notification letter from The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (Nasdaq) dated August 26, 2026, regarding a delayed Form 10-Q filing"
"IP Strategy Holdings (NASDAQ:IPST) stock moved upwards by 11.67%"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 6D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 89/100
🔴 Weakest match
Thorstein Veblen — 21/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide between growth-oriented and risk-averse methodologies. Peter Lynch, Samuel Armstrong Nelson, and Jack Schwager all see it as a high-potential opportunity—Lynch highlights undervalued growth, Nelson spots a favorable cycle position, and Schwager approves of its disciplined risk/reward setup. Meanwhile, Benjamin Graham’s two approaches split sharply: his Defensive Investor finds it attractive, while the Enterprising Investor dismisses it as lacking a deep bargain. Howard Marks’ cycle and general views also diverge—his cycle model is cautiously optimistic, but his broader perspective flags overpriced expectations. On the other end, efficiency skeptics like Loeb, Bagehot, and Housel warn of volatility, liquidity risks, or capital erosion, while trend-followers like Livermore and Fisher outright reject it for lacking momentum or quality. The contrast underscores whether the stock’s strengths (growth, cycle timing) outweigh its risks (volatility, valuation) or if it’s fundamentally misaligned with core principles.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 89
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 80
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 76
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 76
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 74
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 70
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 63
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 56
Some discount, but not the deep 'net-net' bargain Graham's enterprising bar sets
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 53
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 40
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 33
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 31
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 31
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 28
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 27
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 21
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 281 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 12 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
54.9%
Operating Margin
-1307.1%
Net Margin
-1360.9%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
-140.2%
ROA
-126.6%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$16.03
Cash
$245.28K
Total Debt
$2.57M
Current Ratio
0.31
Debt/Equity
0.03
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$2.76
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$35.78
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
⚠️ Extreme
Model output is extreme — likely a data/model limitation for this stock, not a reliable fair-value read.
Year 1 Growth Rate
12.9%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12.9% | $-17.39M | $-15.96M |
| 2 | 10.3% | $-19.19M | $-16.15M |
| 3 | 7.7% | $-20.67M | $-15.96M |
| 4 | 5.1% | $-21.72M | $-15.39M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-22.27M | $-14.47M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-15.40M
Terminal Value
$-351.11M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-228.20M
Enterprise Value
$-306.13M
Net Debt
$2.33M
Equity Value
$-308.46M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$10.18
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$0.68
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 11 positive, 5 neutral, 4 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Benzinga · 31.8.2026
ACCESS Newswire · 28.8.2026
ChartMill · 27.8.2026
ChartMill · 27.8.2026
Benzinga · 27.8.2026
ChartMill · 27.8.2026
ChartMill · 20.8.2026
ChartMill · 20.8.2026
ChartMill · 20.8.2026
ChartMill · 19.8.2026
ChartMill · 19.8.2026
Benzinga · 19.8.2026
Benzinga · 19.8.2026
ChartMill · 18.8.2026
Barchart · 18.8.2026
ChartMill · 18.8.2026
ChartMill · 18.8.2026
Benzinga · 18.8.2026
Benzinga · 17.8.2026
Associated Press · 17.8.2026
IP Strategy Holdings, Inc. (IPST) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 39/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
IPST currently scores 39/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
IPST's technical score is 7/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 20.4%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 59.4%; Debt/equity: 0.03.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin: -1307.1% (negative); Net margin: -1360.9% (negative); Operating margin is eroding over time.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for IPST.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CARROSINO MICHAEL | Tax Withholding in Shares | 2.8.2026 | 330 | -330 | $2.16 |
| CARROSINO MICHAEL | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 2.8.2026 | 1,111 | +1,111 | — |
| Stiefel Justin B | Tax Withholding in Shares | 2.8.2026 | 433 | -433 | $2.16 |
| Stiefel Justin B | Tax Withholding in Shares | 2.8.2026 | 62 | -62 | $2.16 |
| Stiefel Jennifer D H | Tax Withholding in Shares | 2.8.2026 | 62 | -62 | $2.16 |
| Stiefel Jennifer D H | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 2.8.2026 | 1,459 | +1,459 | — |
| CARROSINO MICHAEL | Tax Withholding in Shares | 2.8.2026 | 38 | -38 | $2.16 |
| Stiefel Justin B | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 2.8.2026 | 1,459 | +1,459 | — |
| Stiefel Justin B | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 2.8.2026 | 209 | -209 | — |
| Stiefel Jennifer D H | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 2.8.2026 | 1,459 | -1,459 | — |
| Stiefel Jennifer D H | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 2.8.2026 | 209 | +209 | — |
| Stiefel Justin B | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 2.8.2026 | 209 | +209 | — |
| Stiefel Justin B | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 2.8.2026 | 1,459 | -1,459 | — |
| CARROSINO MICHAEL | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 2.8.2026 | 125 | -125 | — |
| Stiefel Jennifer D H | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 2.8.2026 | 209 | -209 | — |
| CARROSINO MICHAEL | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 2.8.2026 | 125 | +125 | — |
| Stiefel Jennifer D H | Tax Withholding in Shares | 2.8.2026 | 433 | -433 | $2.16 |
| CARROSINO MICHAEL | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 2.8.2026 | 1,111 | -1,111 | — |
| CARROSINO MICHAEL | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 2.8.2026 | 2,839 | +125 | — |
| CARROSINO MICHAEL | Tax Withholding in Shares | 2.8.2026 | 2,801 | -38 | $2.16 |
| CARROSINO MICHAEL | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 2.8.2026 | 3,912 | +1,111 | — |
| CARROSINO MICHAEL | Tax Withholding in Shares | 2.8.2026 | 3,582 | -330 | $2.16 |
| CARROSINO MICHAEL | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 2.8.2026 | 0 | -125 | — |
| CARROSINO MICHAEL | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 2.8.2026 | 3,703 | -1,111 | — |
| Stiefel Justin B | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 2.8.2026 | 5,342 | +1,459 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
50,826 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 9,698 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
49.8% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 39.1% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology