Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$1.79
▲ $0.00 (+0.0%)
Market data updated: 09/26 11:47 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/26/2026
News analyzed: 09/26/2026
Market Cap
$16.17M
Day Range
$1.79 - $1.84
52-Week Range
$1.46 - $2.26
Beta
—
Next Earnings
10.11.2026
Support
$1.70
Resistance
$2.00
IPM is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
-7.7% (1Y)
Strengths: 7/28 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 2049.9%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $1.55 vs. price $1.79 (-13.6%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (74/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (38/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
39
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
Not enough data yet to generate this synthesis.
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
74
Quality
42
Value
38
Momentum
15
Risk
48
Sentiment
50
Fundamental
35
Institutional
100
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Everyone's writing about Intelligent Protection Management Corp.. News trend score: 50. Reason: The mix of positive and negative articles is balanced — 0 vs. 0 out of the last 1 articles.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
14
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
83
Psychology
16
Fundamentals
35
Technical
15
Valuation
38
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
+6%
Market Narrative
41
Fundamental Reality
83
Narrative Gap
-42
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 92/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 3/100
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 92
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 91
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 81
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 67
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 66
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 60
Some discount, but not the deep 'net-net' bargain Graham's enterprising bar sets
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 50
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 48
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 47
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 45
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 41
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 38
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 36
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 30
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 29
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 3
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 285 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 10 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
A trading range after a decline, but still without clear (volume-based) confirmation of an accumulation phase.
Low confidence
$1.70
Range Bottom
$2.00
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
52.3%
Operating Margin
-20.0%
Net Margin
-8.3%
EBITDA Margin
-18.0%
ROE
-10.8%
ROA
-7.5%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$0.15
Cash
$5.60M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
1.57
Debt/Equity
—
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$1.79
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$1.55
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-13.6%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
25.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25.0% | $995.72K | $913.50K |
| 2 | 19.4% | $1.19M | $1.00M |
| 3 | 13.8% | $1.35M | $1.04M |
| 4 | 8.1% | $1.46M | $1.04M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $1.50M | $973.91K |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$796.58K
Terminal Value
$23.63M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$15.36M
Enterprise Value
$20.33M
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$20.33M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$1.38
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$0.45
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 0 positive, 1 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 1 articles.
Yahoo · 24.9.2026
Intelligent Protection Management Corp. (IPM) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 39/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
IPM currently scores 39/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, IPM's estimated fair value is $1.55, which is 13.6% below the current price of $1.79. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
IPM's technical score is 15/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 2049.9%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 83.5%; Net income growth: 76.8%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $1.55 vs. price $1.79 (-13.6%); SMA 50 recently crossed below SMA 200; Operating margin: -20.0% (negative).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for IPM.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 8 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 16 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLOANE BARRY | Open Market Purchase | 21.5.2026 | 5,000 | +5,000 | $1.95 |
| Katz Jason | Open Market Purchase | 21.5.2026 | 667,803 | +10,000 | $1.97 |
| Silberstein John | Open Market Purchase | 19.5.2026 | 156,269 | +1,000 | $1.92 |
| Abada Yoram | Open Market Purchase | 15.5.2026 | 15,500 | +1,000 | $1.89 |
| Adam Katz 2012 Revocable Trust | Open Market Purchase | 10.4.2026 | 1,000,000 | +19,309 | $1.79 |
| Adam Katz 2012 Revocable Trust | Open Market Purchase | 9.4.2026 | 980,691 | +2,200 | $1.79 |
| Adam Katz 2012 Revocable Trust | Open Market Purchase | 8.4.2026 | 978,491 | +19,951 | $1.80 |
| Adam Katz 2012 Revocable Trust | Open Market Purchase | 7.4.2026 | 958,540 | +21,512 | $1.80 |
| Abada Yoram | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.3.2026 | 10,000 | +10,000 | — |
| Katz Jason | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.3.2026 | 50,000 | +50,000 | — |
| Mills Jared | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.3.2026 | 20,000 | +20,000 | — |
| Jenny Kara B | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.3.2026 | 20,000 | +20,000 | — |
| Silberstein John | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.3.2026 | 10,000 | +10,000 | — |
| Laifer Lance | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.3.2026 | 10,000 | +10,000 | — |
| Zalko Adam | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.3.2026 | 20,000 | +20,000 | — |
| Rabsatt Sidney E. | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.3.2026 | 10,000 | +10,000 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
33,002 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 33,075 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
45.7% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 39.1% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology