Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· · CBOE
$105.55
▲ $0.59 (+0.6%)
Market data updated: 09/17 05:37 PM
News analyzed: 09/17/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$104.11 - $106.51
52-Week Range
$73.93 - $117.99
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
-6.3% (1Y)
⚠️ Insufficient data for a reliable StockIQ Score
Only 3 of 7 categories available — Fundamental, Growth, Valuation, Quality unavailable.
Strengths: 4/13 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟡 Mixed
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is above the 50-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 0.40 (3y annualized return 14.5% / max drawdown 36.6%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 1 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 1
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
Intermediate Growth Properties (IGV) earns an overall investor score of 77 with a 'STRONG' rating, driven primarily by robust technical performance and a near-perfect news sentiment score. The technical category (75) reflects a strong uptrend, with the stock consistently trading above both its 50-day and 200-day moving averages, alongside a healthy Relative Strength Index (RSI) of 53.6, indicating positive momentum. However, the MACD histogram’s negative reading introduces a nuanced concern, signaling potential deceleration in upward momentum. The news category (100) stands out as a key strength, with overwhelmingly positive coverage—particularly around AI-driven software sector rallies (e.g., ServiceNow, Snowflake)—which suggests market optimism and sector tailwinds. Conversely, the risk category (42) is notably weak, highlighted by a historically high max drawdown of 36.6% over three years and a low Calmar ratio of 0.35, signaling volatility risk and potential drawdown sensitivity. These factors create a mixed but cautiously optimistic profile, where technical strength and positive sentiment are offset by elevated risk metrics.
The stock demonstrates clear bullish technicals, with sustained positions above both the 50-day and 200-day moving averages, alongside a positive RSI (53.6) and a price above its SAR point. However, the MACD histogram’s negative reading indicates weakening momentum.
This balance of strength and caution in technical indicators suggests a stock that may remain resilient but could face near-term volatility or consolidation.
All news coverage is either neutral or positive, with multiple articles highlighting sector-wide AI-driven growth (e.g., ServiceNow, Snowflake) and bullish analyst commentary. No negative sentiment is present.
This overwhelmingly positive news environment reflects strong market confidence and potential sector-driven tailwinds, which could sustain or amplify upward price movement.
The stock exhibits high volatility risk, with a 3-year max drawdown of 36.6% and a Calmar ratio of 0.35, indicating significant drawdowns relative to returns. ATR stands at 2.8% of price, suggesting moderate volatility.
These risk metrics imply that while the stock may deliver strong returns, it also carries a substantial risk of sharp corrections, particularly in adverse market conditions.
StockIQ conclusion
Intermediate Growth Properties (IGV) presents a compelling yet cautious profile, with strong technical indicators and overwhelmingly positive news sentiment outweighing elevated risk metrics. The stock’s resilience above key moving averages and healthy momentum suggest near-term stability, but the high volatility and potential for sharp drawdowns necessitate vigilance. Investors should monitor momentum indicators and sector-specific developments closely, as these could either sustain the current positive trajectory or introduce unexpected volatility.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
63
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 26, 2026
Then
73
$101.85
Now
63
$105.55
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
56
Risk
42
Sentiment
92
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of the **iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV)** has centered on volatility and sector-wide shifts, particularly around AI-driven growth and investor sentiment. The fund saw a $700 million withdrawal ahead of Snowflake’s earnings, sparking debate over AI disruption and software sector valuation. Meanwhile, tech giants like Microsoft (Azure revenue surpassing $100B) and Oracle faced scrutiny over AI investments and guidance, while broader market trends—including crude oil prices and Treasury yields—highlighted macroeconomic pressures. Analysts note the sector remains undervalued despite recent gains.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF. News trend score: 92. Reason: 12 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 5 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
24
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
27
Fundamentals
—
Technical
56
Valuation
—
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
+19%
Market Narrative
57
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+7
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for IGV suggests a dominant *euphoric* mindset, where positive momentum, outperformance relative to long-term averages, and overwhelmingly bullish sentiment align to create an optimistic bias. The narrative gap (64 vs. 50) hints at a disconnect where expectations may exceed tangible fundamentals, a classic euphoria trait. However, the absence of extreme volume or volatility signals suggests this euphoria is measured rather than reckless. The key open question is whether traders are anchoring to recent highs or if the 7.6% resistance proximity could act as a psychological barrier—especially if sentiment cools or momentum stalls.
Updated: 09/08/2026, 11:20 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Microsoft appealed Virginia grid-cost rules for its data centers while revealing Azure generates over $100 billion in annual revenue as AI reshapes its business."
"Investors yanked $700 million from the top software ETF in a single session, and within hours a major earnings report threatened to make that timing look catastrophic."
"a deeper AI disruption debate that has kept the fund negative all year."
"Tech sector remains undervalued, with >12% below fair value, despite aggressive CapEx and capacity expansion from hyperscalers."
📈 4D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 56/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jack Schwager — 20/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The methodologies diverge sharply here, with Samuel Armstrong Nelson’s cyclical analysis standing out as the lone bullish voice, estimating a favorable position closer to oversold than overbought. Meanwhile, the majority of approaches—ranging from Benjamin Graham’s valuation skepticism to Jack Schwager’s outright rejection—converge on caution, flagging insufficient data or outright poor setups. Even the most neutral frameworks, like Peter Lynch’s or Philip Fisher’s, can’t muster a definitive buy signal due to gaps in growth or fundamentals, while Howard Marks and Morgan Housel warn of volatility and late-cycle risks. The contrast highlights how technical cyclists like Nelson might see opportunity where fundamentalists or disciplined traders like Schwager or Livermore see red flags, illustrating a fundamental tension between momentum-driven and data-dependent strategies.
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 56
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 55
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 48
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 47
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 46
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 40
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 38
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 36
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 29
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 20
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 276 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟡 Indicators are mixed — no clear bias (4 bullish · 4 bearish · 3 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 15.6.2026 | $0.017 |
| 7.6.2023 | $0.005 |
| 9.6.2022 | $0.005 |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 12 positive, 3 neutral, 5 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 13.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 11.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.9.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for IGV specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
IGV's technical score is 56/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average; RSI 55.3 — healthy positive momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 0.40 (3y annualized return 14.5% / max drawdown 36.6%); MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum; Price is below the SAR point — downtrend.
Yes — IGV has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 0 filings.
No recent insider transaction filings found for this stock.
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
23,607,628 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 27,744,935 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
61.5% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 59.3% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology