Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$3.04
▼ $0.03 (-1.0%)
Market data updated: 09/26 10:54 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/26/2026
News analyzed: 09/26/2026
Market Cap
$17.14M
Day Range
$2.97 - $3.20
52-Week Range
$1.17 - $5.28
Beta
—
Next Earnings
12.11.2026
Support
$1.87
Resistance
$3.63
IDAI is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
-9.5% (1Y)
Strengths: 13/29 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟡 Mixed
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 76.5%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$22.75 vs. price $3.04 (-848.3%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (76/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (38/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
53
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
5d ago · $2.96
Evidence: Narrative Gap moved from 39 to -5 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
76
Quality
63
Value
38
Momentum
55
Risk
46
Sentiment
68
Fundamental
34
Institutional
100
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of T Stamp Inc. (likely a misreference for *Trust Stamp*, based on headlines) highlights its financial performance and strategic expansions. Reports note a 22% revenue growth in H1 2026, selection for the EU’s IPCEI program, and entry into the $48 billion Sovereign-AI market, alongside continued pipeline and customer growth. Additionally, a CEO share buyback and quarterly earnings miss (with higher-than-expected losses) were briefly mentioned, though broader market trends dominated other sources. The company’s focus appears on telecom partnerships in Africa and digital identity advancements.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about T Stamp Inc.. News trend score: 68. Reason: 10 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 7 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
17
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
45
Psychology
55
Fundamentals
34
Technical
55
Valuation
38
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+105%
Market Narrative
40
Fundamental Reality
45
Narrative Gap
-5
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for IDAI suggests a dominant euphoric state, where extreme momentum (+21% ROC) and outperformance (+38.4% above 200-day average) align with elevated sentiment (92/100). FOMO and overconfidence further indicate investors may be chasing gains without fundamental justification, given the disconnect between price momentum and EPS growth. The large narrative gap (39 points) hints at a potential misalignment between market enthusiasm and underlying realities. The key open question is whether this euphoria reflects justified optimism or an unsustainable rally. The peer underperformance (+1.9% vs. -3.9%) also suggests selective euphoria rather than broad market contagion.
Updated: 09/05/2026, 02:31 AM
What could change this?
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 3D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jack Schwager — 37/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock’s starkly divided verdicts reflect deep methodological contrasts. The highest-scoring approaches—Bagehot’s liquidity focus and Graham’s defensive value framework—see it as a resilient, undervalued opportunity, prioritizing financial robustness and margin of safety. Meanwhile, growth-oriented thinkers like Lynch, Veblen, and Livermore spot upward momentum or qualitative potential, though their scores dip slightly below the top tier. In contrast, more skeptical frameworks—from Marks’ risk-averse cycle analysis to Mackay’s crowd-behavior lens—flag red flags, whether in valuation, market timing, or speculative excess, scoring it as a cautionary case. The middle ground (Fisher, Smith, Housel) acknowledges solid traits but lacks the exceptional conviction or clarity to justify a strong buy. The divergence underscores whether the stock’s strengths align with defensive fundamentals, speculative upside, or systemic risks.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 100
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 98
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 78
Deep statistical discount — a real Enterprising Investor candidate
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 75
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 74
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 73
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 69
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 65
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 63
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 59
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 58
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 53
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 50
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 42
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 37
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 286 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟡 Indicators are mixed — no clear bias (4 bullish · 4 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
-244.0%
Net Margin
-265.2%
EBITDA Margin
-219.6%
ROE
-95.4%
ROA
-74.1%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$2.67
Cash
$6.04M
Total Debt
$1.13M
Current Ratio
7.85
Debt/Equity
0.13
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$3.04
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$22.75
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-848.3%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-5.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -5.0% | $-5.44M | $-5.00M |
| 2 | -3.1% | $-5.27M | $-4.44M |
| 3 | -1.2% | $-5.21M | $-4.02M |
| 4 | 0.6% | $-5.24M | $-3.71M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-5.37M | $-3.49M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-5.73M
Terminal Value
$-84.71M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-55.06M
Enterprise Value
$-75.72M
Net Debt
$-4.91M
Equity Value
$-70.81M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$2.80
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$2.34
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 10 positive, 3 neutral, 7 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Benzinga · 24.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Proactive · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 9.9.2026
Proactive · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
Proactive · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
Benzinga · 8.9.2026
Benzinga · 20.8.2026
Benzinga · 13.8.2026
Proactive · 13.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 13.8.2026
Proactive · 13.8.2026
Benzinga · 12.8.2026
T Stamp Inc. (IDAI) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 53/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
IDAI currently scores 53/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, IDAI's estimated fair value is -$22.75, which is 848.3% below the current price of $3.04. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
IDAI's technical score is 55/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 76.5%; Free cash flow growth: 35.8%; Net income growth: 33.6%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$22.75 vs. price $3.04 (-848.3%); Operating margin: -244.0% (negative); Net margin: -265.2% (negative).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for IDAI.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 19 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McClintock William | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.8.2026 | 416 | +52 | — |
| Potts Charles Edward | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.8.2026 | 22,236 | +1,020 | — |
| Potts Charles Edward | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.8.2026 | 1,020 | +1,020 | — |
| McClintock William | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.8.2026 | 52 | +52 | — |
| Genner Gareth Neville | Open Market Purchase | 24.8.2026 | 153,075 | +2,000 | $3.21 |
| Genner Gareth Neville | Gift | 24.8.2026 | 81,468 | -3,000 | — |
| Genner Gareth Neville | Gift | 24.8.2026 | 3,000 | -3,000 | — |
| Genner Gareth Neville | Open Market Purchase | 24.8.2026 | 2,000 | +2,000 | $3.21 |
| Genner Gareth Neville | Open Market Purchase | 21.8.2026 | 151,075 | +1,000 | $3.21 |
| Genner Gareth Neville | Open Market Purchase | 21.8.2026 | 1,000 | +1,000 | $3.21 |
| Francis Andrew Scott | Open Market Purchase | 20.8.2026 | 78,673 | +1,600 | $3.10 |
| Genner Gareth Neville | Open Market Purchase | 20.8.2026 | 150,075 | +9,394 | $3.04 |
| Potts Charles Edward | Open Market Purchase | 20.8.2026 | 6,187 | +627 | $3.19 |
| Genner Gareth Neville | Open Market Purchase | 20.8.2026 | 140,075 | +800 | $3.09 |
| Genner Gareth Neville | Open Market Purchase | 20.8.2026 | 800 | +800 | $3.09 |
| Genner Gareth Neville | Open Market Purchase | 20.8.2026 | 9,394 | +9,394 | $3.04 |
| Francis Andrew Scott | Open Market Purchase | 20.8.2026 | 1,600 | +1,600 | $3.10 |
| Potts Charles Edward | Open Market Purchase | 20.8.2026 | 627 | +627 | $3.19 |
| Genner Gareth Neville | Open Market Purchase | 19.8.2026 | 140,681 | +606 | $2.55 |
| Genner Gareth Neville | Open Market Purchase | 19.8.2026 | 606 | +606 | $2.55 |
| Genner Gareth Neville | Open Market Purchase | 18.8.2026 | 137,275 | +500 | $2.53 |
| Genner Gareth Neville | Open Market Purchase | 18.8.2026 | 136,775 | +4,000 | $2.46 |
| Genner Gareth Neville | Open Market Purchase | 18.8.2026 | 139,275 | +2,000 | $2.52 |
| Genner Gareth Neville | Open Market Purchase | 18.8.2026 | 2,000 | +2,000 | $2.52 |
| Genner Gareth Neville | Open Market Purchase | 18.8.2026 | 500 | +500 | $2.53 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
137,846 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 70,881 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
35.6% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 34.6% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology