Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Energy · ·
$39.79
▼ $1.12 (-2.7%)
Market data updated: 09/23 04:30 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/23/2026
News analyzed: 09/23/2026
Market Cap
$3.98B
Day Range
$39.55 - $40.78
52-Week Range
$21.66 - $48.17
Beta
—
Next Earnings
16.11.2026
Support
$32.58
Resistance
$48.17
HP is a stock from the Energy sector — Oil, gas, and renewable energy — highly volatile profitability, dependent on global commodity prices.
+96.2% (1Y)
Strengths: 8/30 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 35.9%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $10.44 vs. price $39.79 (-73.8%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
48
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
40
Quality
58
Value
38
Momentum
47
Risk
40
Sentiment
98
Fundamental
35
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Helmerich & Payne, Inc. has focused on its strong financial performance and market momentum following a recent earnings report. The company’s quarterly results exceeded expectations, with robust revenue and EBITDA growth, though it reported an adjusted net loss. Management’s optimistic outlook has driven a sharp stock price surge—up 33.3% in 30 days and 48.2% year-to-date—alongside a 126% total shareholder return over the past year. Analysts, like Citigroup, have raised price targets, signaling continued confidence in its recovery and operational improvements.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Helmerich & Payne, Inc.. News trend score: 98. Reason: 11 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
37
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
40
Psychology
45
Fundamentals
35
Technical
47
Valuation
38
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
+13%
Market Narrative
64
Fundamental Reality
40
Narrative Gap
+24
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
HP’s market behavior suggests a dominant overconfidence bias, where price momentum outpaces fundamentals and valuation far exceeds intrinsic worth. The euphoria score aligns with this, as positive sentiment and momentum create a detached narrative from fundamentals. The narrative gap (70 vs. 40) reinforces this disconnect, indicating traders may overlook risks. The key question: *Will traders remain detached from valuation risks, or will fundamentals reassert themselves?*
Updated: 09/07/2026, 10:41 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"reported quarterly results that combined revenue above expectations and stronger EBITDA with an adjusted net loss, while management outlined a constructive outlook"
"Citigroup analyst Scott Gruber maintains Helmerich & Payne with a Neutral and raises the price target from $36 to $48"
"share price has moved sharply, with a 30-day return of 33.29% and year-to-date return of 48.16%"
"Helmerich & Payne nears a turning point... margins improving, strong FCF"
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 91/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 15/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock splits the historical methodologies into starkly different camps, with Edgar Lawrence Smith’s high score (82) standing out as an outlier advocating a ‘buy and hold for a decade’ approach, while the rest cluster in the mid-to-low range. Smith’s bullishness contrasts sharply with Morgan Housel’s near-bearish verdict (16), which flags volatility that would unsettle patient investors—highlighting a tension between long-term conviction and short-term risk aversion. Meanwhile, Benjamin Graham’s two methodologies (defensive 40, enterprising 61) reveal a nuanced split: the enterprising investor sees *some* discount, but neither version meets his strict criteria. Fisher, Lynch, and Livermore all hover around neutral (48–61), suggesting the stock lacks the standout growth or trend clarity they prioritize, while Veblen’s low score (21) implies it may fit his critique of speculative overreach. The debate thus hinges on whether HP’s valuation and momentum align with a disciplined, patient strategy (Smith) or whether its risks—cyclicality, volatility, or speculative overhang—dominate (Housel, Marks, Veblen).
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 91
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 82
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 67
Some discount, but not the deep 'net-net' bargain Graham's enterprising bar sets
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 54
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 52
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 48
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 45
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 44
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 43
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 42
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 42
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 39
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 30
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 21
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 15
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 283 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (4 bullish · 7 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
0.1%
Net Margin
-4.4%
EBITDA Margin
16.8%
ROE
-5.8%
ROA
-2.4%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$1.66
Cash
$196.85M
Total Debt
$2.06B
Current Ratio
1.80
Debt/Equity
0.73
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 18.8.2026 | $0.250 |
| 18.5.2026 | $0.250 |
| 17.5.2026 | $0.250 |
| 13.2.2026 | $0.250 |
| 12.2.2026 | $0.250 |
| 18.11.2025 | $0.250 |
| 17.11.2025 | $0.250 |
| 15.8.2025 | $0.250 |
| 14.8.2025 | $0.250 |
| 15.5.2025 | $0.250 |
| 14.5.2025 | $0.250 |
| 14.2.2025 | $0.250 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$39.79
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$10.44
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-73.8%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
23.8%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 23.8% | $144.31M | $132.39M |
| 2 | 18.5% | $170.96M | $143.89M |
| 3 | 13.1% | $193.43M | $149.37M |
| 4 | 7.8% | $208.56M | $147.75M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $213.78M | $138.94M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$116.58M
Terminal Value
$3.37B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$2.19B
Enterprise Value
$2.90B
Net Debt
$1.87B
Equity Value
$1.04B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$28.50
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$21.77
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 11 positive, 6 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Benzinga · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 5.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Benzinga · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 1.9.2026
Benzinga · 31.8.2026
Benzinga · 31.8.2026
Yahoo · 28.8.2026
StockStory · 28.8.2026
Yahoo · 24.8.2026
StockStory · 24.8.2026
Rigzone.com · 20.8.2026
Benzinga · 20.8.2026
MT Newswires · 20.8.2026
MT Newswires · 18.8.2026
PR Newswire · 18.8.2026
Zacks · 17.8.2026
Zacks · 17.8.2026
Helmerich & Payne, Inc. (HP) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 48/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
HP currently scores 48/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, HP's estimated fair value is $10.44, which is 73.8% below the current price of $39.79. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
HP's technical score is 47/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 35.9%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Current ratio: 1.80.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $10.44 vs. price $39.79 (-73.8%); Net margin: -4.4% (negative); ATR: 4.0% of price.
Yes — HP has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 17 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HELMERICH HANS | Open Market Sale | 20.8.2026 | 471,735 | -25,000 | $43.90 |
| HELMERICH HANS | Open Market Sale | 20.8.2026 | 1,150,915 | -65,000 | $43.90 |
| HELMERICH HANS | Open Market Sale | 20.8.2026 | 20,000 | -4,470 | $43.90 |
| HELMERICH HANS | Open Market Sale | 20.8.2026 | 4,470 | -4,470 | $43.90 |
| HELMERICH HANS | Open Market Sale | 20.8.2026 | 65,000 | -65,000 | $43.90 |
| HELMERICH HANS | Open Market Sale | 20.8.2026 | 25,000 | -25,000 | $43.90 |
| Hair Cara M. | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 11,149 | -11,149 | $44.27 |
| Momper Sara Marie | Open Market Sale | 14.8.2026 | 5,054 | -5,054 | $44.28 |
| Lennox Michael | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 5,000 | -5,000 | $40.00 |
| Lennox Michael | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 181,037 | -5,000 | $40.00 |
| Scruggs Todd N. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.7.2026 | 2,150 | -2,150 | $34.57 |
| Scruggs Todd N. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.7.2026 | 39,981 | -2,150 | $34.57 |
| Lennox Michael | Open Market Sale | 22.7.2026 | 5,000 | -5,000 | $35.00 |
| Lennox Michael | Open Market Sale | 22.7.2026 | 186,037 | -5,000 | $35.00 |
| Lennox Michael | Open Market Sale | 22.7.2026 | 186,037 | -5,000 | $35.00 |
| Momper Sara Marie | Tax Withholding in Shares | 4.6.2026 | 440 | -440 | $39.60 |
| Momper Sara Marie | Tax Withholding in Shares | 4.6.2026 | 22,012 | -440 | $39.60 |
| Hair Cara M. | Open Market Sale | 18.5.2026 | 28,345 | -28,345 | $41.45 |
| Hair Cara M. | Open Market Sale | 18.5.2026 | 147,244 | -28,345 | $41.45 |
| Hair Cara M. | Open Market Sale | 19.3.2026 | 58,771 | -58,771 | $36.62 |
| Hair Cara M. | Open Market Sale | 19.3.2026 | 175,589 | -58,771 | $36.62 |
| HELMERICH HANS | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.3.2026 | 7,910 | +7,910 | — |
| MAS JOSE RAMON | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.3.2026 | 5,273 | +5,273 | — |
| Killinger Elizabeth R | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.3.2026 | 5,273 | +5,273 | — |
| Robillard Donald F JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.3.2026 | 5,273 | +5,273 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
7,283,017 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 8,375,555 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
57.2% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 64.9% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology