Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Industrials · ·
$32.53
▲ $0.33 (+1.0%)
Market data updated: 09/22 03:36 AM
News analyzed: 09/22/2026
Market Cap
$56.17B
Day Range
$32.42 - $32.73
52-Week Range
$23.25 - $34.16
Beta
—
Next Earnings
05.11.2026
Support
$27.70
Resistance
$33.45
HMC is a stock from the Industrials sector — Manufacturing, aerospace, defense, and infrastructure — closely tied to capital-investment cycles and economic growth.
-2.5% (1Y)
⚠️ Insufficient data for a reliable StockIQ Score
Only 3 of 7 categories available — Fundamental, Growth, Valuation, Quality unavailable.
Strengths: 9/14 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟢 Bullish
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 2.0% of price
Risk
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: -0.07 (3y annualized return -2.6% / max drawdown 37.7%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
77
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of September 19, 2026
Then
73
$32.20
Now
77
$32.53
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
74
Risk
50
Sentiment
98
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Honda Motor Company, Ltd. has centered on financial and operational challenges, particularly its push for **$9.4 billion in supplier cost reductions by 2030**, including a 30% price cut in key parts and increased use of Chinese-made components. Analysts highlight **structural pressures** from EV transitions, competition with Chinese automakers, and geopolitical risks, raising concerns about its auto segment recovery and stock valuation. Investment discussions focus on whether Honda remains a viable option for value investors amid these headwinds.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Honda Motor Company, Ltd.. News trend score: 98. Reason: 11 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
25
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
50
Fundamentals
—
Technical
74
Valuation
—
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
+27%
Market Narrative
64
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+14
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for HMC is dominated by **anchoring**, as the stock’s proximity to resistance (2.4%) suggests traders are fixating on this psychological barrier. While FOMO and euphoria scores are present, they’re muted by neutral sentiment and lack of volume spikes. The narrative gap (-23) further implies a disconnect between market reality (strong momentum) and investor perception, possibly reinforcing anchoring. The key question: will traders break resistance or retreat if the stock tests support?
Updated: 09/07/2026, 09:56 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
""Honda Motor asked suppliers to reduce prices by 30% in key parts categories""
""The margin battle with China is getting far more aggressive""
""Honda Motor faces structural headwinds from EV refits""
""geopolitical risks, challenging its auto segment turnaround""
📈 7D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Morgan Housel — 67/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jack Schwager — 26/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide between methodologies, with some investors seeing potential while others flag caution or uncertainty. Morgan Housel’s high score (74) suggests it fits his patient, long-term compounder profile, while Charles Mackay’s (67) and Gerald Loeb’s (61) moderate scores hint at rising speculative interest or controlled risk. Meanwhile, the majority—including Howard Marks (58), Jesse Livermore (53), and even the market-cycle variant (51)—lean toward neutrality or skepticism, either due to high expectations or lack of clear momentum. The lowest scores (Nelson at 24, Schwager at 42) reflect outright concern over overvaluation or indecision, while the Graham, Fisher, and Lynch methodologies all default to neutral (50) for lack of sufficient data. The contrast underscores whether this stock is a stealth growth opportunity (Housel) or a speculative gamble (Mackay) in an environment where fundamentals remain murky.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 67
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 58
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 53
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 48
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 44
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 42
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 39
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 27
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 26
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 281 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (8 bullish · 2 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 28.3.2025 | $0.712 |
| 27.3.2025 | $0.712 |
| 27.9.2024 | $0.673 |
| 26.9.2024 | $0.673 |
| 27.3.2024 | $0.747 |
| 26.3.2024 | $0.747 |
| 28.9.2023 | $0.591 |
| 27.9.2023 | $0.591 |
| 29.3.2023 | $0.430 |
| 28.3.2023 | $0.430 |
| 28.9.2022 | $0.443 |
| 27.9.2022 | $0.443 |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 11 positive, 6 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 20.9.2026
Benzinga · 20.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 12.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 12.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Honda Motor Company, Ltd. (HMC) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for HMC specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
HMC's technical score is 74/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 2.0% of price; Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: -0.07 (3y annualized return -2.6% / max drawdown 37.7%); MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum; CMF 20 days: -0.34.
Yes — HMC has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sakai Kunihiko | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 70 | +70 | $10.76 |
| Oe Kensuke | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 442 | +442 | $10.76 |
| Suzuki Asako | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 383 | +383 | $10.76 |
| Kokubu Fumiya | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 70 | +70 | $10.76 |
| Igarashi Masayuki | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 454 | +454 | $10.76 |
| Fujimura Eiji | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 767 | +767 | $10.76 |
| Higashi Kazuhiro | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 70 | +70 | $10.76 |
| Agatsuma Mika | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 70 | +70 | $10.76 |
| Morisawa Jiro | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 383 | +383 | $10.76 |
| Nagata Ryoko | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 70 | +70 | $10.76 |
| Ogawa Yoichiro | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 70 | +70 | $10.76 |
| Ito Hironao | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 442 | +442 | $10.76 |
| Shikama Mahito | Grant/Award from Employer | 6.8.2026 | 5,000 | +5,000 | $10.40 |
| Shikama Mahito | Grant/Award from Employer | 6.8.2026 | 12,728 | +5,000 | $10.40 |
| Fujimura Eiji | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2026 | 789 | +789 | $10.36 |
| Ito Hironao | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2026 | 455 | +455 | $10.36 |
| Ogawa Yoichiro | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2026 | 72 | +72 | $10.36 |
| Morisawa Jiro | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2026 | 394 | +394 | $10.36 |
| Agatsuma Mika | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2026 | 72 | +72 | $10.36 |
| Suzuki Asako | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2026 | 394 | +394 | $10.36 |
| Nagata Ryoko | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2026 | 72 | +72 | $10.36 |
| Kokubu Fumiya | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2026 | 72 | +72 | $10.36 |
| Igarashi Masayuki | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2026 | 467 | +467 | $10.36 |
| Sakai Kunihiko | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2026 | 72 | +72 | $10.36 |
| Oe Kensuke | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2026 | 455 | +455 | $10.36 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
2,110,842 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 2,259,803 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
72.6% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 55.8% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology