Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$82.88
▲ $0.42 (+0.5%)
Market data updated: 09/27 06:15 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/26/2026
News analyzed: 09/27/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$82.44 - $82.97
52-Week Range
$34.42 - $84.85
Beta
—
Next Earnings
04.11.2026
Support
$78.36
Resistance
$84.85
GSAT is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
+139.2% (1Y)
Strengths: 14/28 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 74.6%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Net margin
Net margin: -3.2% (negative)
Fundamental
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
61
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
today · $82.88
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 3 to 28 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
Not enough data yet to generate this synthesis.
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
68
Quality
58
Value
50
Momentum
75
Risk
64
Sentiment
86
Fundamental
35
Institutional
22
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Everyone's writing about Globalstar, Inc.. News trend score: 86. Reason: 8 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 66/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 14/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The methodologies here split sharply between cautious optimism and outright skepticism about GSAT, reflecting starkly different priorities. Charles Mackay’s high score suggests the stock avoids crowd-driven mania, while Peter Lynch and Gerald Loeb see it as a balanced play with growth already priced in or a reasonable preservation case—but neither is overwhelmingly bullish. In contrast, the more rigorous value and trend-following frameworks, like Graham’s defensive criteria or Livermore’s trend-rule, reject it outright, scoring poorly due to perceived instability or lack of a clear upward momentum. Meanwhile, Fisher and Schwager’s high-barred quality and setup standards dismiss it entirely, while the efficient-market camp questions whether active selection adds value over passive indexing. The divide underscores whether the stock’s merits hinge on relative safety (Mackay, Loeb) or whether its risks—like unproven profitability (Veblen) or overvaluation (Graham)—make it a speculative gamble rather than a core holding.
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 66
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 66
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 61
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 56
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 55
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 55
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 52
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 47
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 44
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 44
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 42
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 34
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 29
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 28
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 19
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 14
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 285 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (8 bullish · 2 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a trading range, but the picture isn't yet clear enough on the likely direction.
Low confidence
$78.36
Range Bottom
$84.85
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
2.7%
Net Margin
-3.2%
EBITDA Margin
34.7%
ROE
-2.4%
ROA
-0.4%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$0.15
Cash
$447.47M
Total Debt
$483.79M
Current Ratio
2.42
Debt/Equity
1.36
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$2.81
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$1.84
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 8 positive, 10 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 26.9.2026
Yahoo · 23.9.2026
Yahoo · 22.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 22.9.2026
MT Newswires · 21.9.2026
MT Newswires · 21.9.2026
MT Newswires · 21.9.2026
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 21.9.2026
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 21.9.2026
PR Newswire · 15.9.2026
Barrons.com · 14.9.2026
Zacks · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Zacks · 9.9.2026
Benzinga · 8.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 29.8.2026
MT Newswires · 26.8.2026
Globalstar, Inc. (GSAT) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 61/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
GSAT currently scores 61/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
GSAT's technical score is 75/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 74.6%; Net income growth: 86.3%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Net margin: -3.2% (negative); Return on equity (ROE): -2.4% (negative); -2.5% over the last 3 months relative to the index.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for GSAT.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 2 purchases and 7 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ponder L Barbee IV | Open Market Sale | 21.9.2026 | 128,891 | -1,692 | $82.96 |
| Monroe James III | Open Market Purchase | 18.9.2026 | 408,253 | +361,600 | $82.52 |
| Lynch James F | Open Market Sale | 18.9.2026 | 351,114 | -361,600 | $82.52 |
| Ponder L Barbee IV | Grant/Award from Employer | 18.9.2026 | 130,583 | +4,000 | — |
| Lynch James F | Open Market Sale | 18.9.2026 | 361,600 | -361,600 | $82.52 |
| Monroe James III | Open Market Purchase | 18.9.2026 | 361,600 | +361,600 | $82.52 |
| Wolff Benjamin G | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 27.8.2026 | 4,444 | -4,444 | — |
| Wolff Benjamin G | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 27.8.2026 | 6,666 | +6,666 | $19.50 |
| Wolff Benjamin G | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 27.8.2026 | 6,666 | -6,666 | — |
| Wolff Benjamin G | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 27.8.2026 | 6,666 | -6,666 | — |
| Wolff Benjamin G | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 27.8.2026 | 2,222 | -2,222 | — |
| Wolff Benjamin G | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 27.8.2026 | 2,222 | +2,222 | $32.85 |
| Wolff Benjamin G | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 27.8.2026 | 4,444 | +4,444 | $28.05 |
| Wolff Benjamin G | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 27.8.2026 | 6,666 | +6,666 | $17.40 |
| Wolff Benjamin G | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 19,998 | -19,998 | $81.98 |
| Wolff Benjamin G | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 27.8.2026 | 10,782 | +6,666 | $17.40 |
| Wolff Benjamin G | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 27.8.2026 | 2,222 | -4,444 | — |
| Wolff Benjamin G | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 27.8.2026 | 17,448 | +6,666 | $19.50 |
| Wolff Benjamin G | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 27.8.2026 | 21,892 | +4,444 | $28.05 |
| Wolff Benjamin G | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 27.8.2026 | 0 | -6,666 | — |
| Wolff Benjamin G | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 27.8.2026 | 4,444 | -2,222 | — |
| Wolff Benjamin G | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 27.8.2026 | 24,114 | +2,222 | $32.85 |
| Wolff Benjamin G | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 4,116 | -19,998 | $81.98 |
| Lynch James F | Open Market Sale | 26.8.2026 | 110,000 | -110,000 | $81.78 |
| Lynch James F | Open Market Sale | 26.8.2026 | 712,714 | -110,000 | $81.78 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
4,457,382 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 4,174,857 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
49.3% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 48.8% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology