Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$21.30
▲ $0.41 (+2.0%)
Market data updated: 09/26 09:23 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/26/2026
News analyzed: 09/26/2026
Market Cap
$866.17M
Day Range
$20.65 - $21.48
52-Week Range
$9.17 - $29.90
Beta
—
Next Earnings
04.11.2026
Support
$17.73
Resistance
$29.90
GRPN is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
-5.6% (1Y)
Strengths: 11/31 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Free cash flow growth
Free cash flow growth: 23.0%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $15.19 vs. price $21.30 (-28.7%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
47
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
48
Quality
58
Value
38
Momentum
66
Risk
20
Sentiment
68
Fundamental
22
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Groupon has centered on its strategic pivot to attract younger audiences and diversify beyond its traditional "mystery deals" model. The company has emphasized AI-driven personalization and expanded offerings, including viral "mystery vacations," which have gained significant attention. Leadership changes, investor engagements, and a restructuring plan have also been highlighted alongside mixed financial results, with Q2 revenues missing expectations despite a narrower loss. Analysts debate its stock valuation amid these shifts.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Groupon, Inc.. News trend score: 68. Reason: 7 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 4 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
44
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
39
Psychology
59
Fundamentals
22
Technical
66
Valuation
38
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-6%
Market Narrative
83
Fundamental Reality
39
Narrative Gap
+44
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
GRPN’s psychology profile reflects a mixed but cautious sentiment, with no dominant bias. The +24% DCF premium and overconfidence score (22) hint at lingering optimism, though weak momentum and oversold conditions (RSI 25) temper enthusiasm. Anchoring (20) may keep traders near support, while muted volume (0.72x avg) suggests limited urgency. The key question: *Is the premium justified by fundamentals, or will traders exit if momentum fails to recover?*
Updated: 09/05/2026, 01:44 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"AI, Personalization Drive Marketplace Reset (article 1)"
"Evolve Product Offerings Beyond Mystery Deals (article 2)"
"COO Appointment And Restructuring Plan (article 7)"
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Jesse Livermore — 72/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock’s starkly divided verdicts reflect deep methodological disagreements about risk, valuation, and market psychology. At the top, Nelson and Mackay see it as a cyclical or crowd-resistant opportunity, with favorable technical positioning or no signs of speculative frenzy. Meanwhile, Fisher, Lynch, and Graham’s approaches—rooted in quality, growth, and deep value—reject it outright, citing weak fundamentals or failure to meet their strict criteria. The middle ground, from Marks to Schwager, suggests it’s a *potential* play—early-cycle, disciplined, or holdable—but with caveats about stretched expectations or mixed signals. The lowest scorers, like Loeb and Bagehot, flag liquidity and risk concerns, while Livermore’s outright negative trend verdict underscores how even technical momentum can clash with core principles. The contrast highlights whether one prioritizes relative positioning (e.g., cycle analysis) or absolute standards (e.g., Graham’s margin of safety).
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟢 72
Positive trend — the price action Livermore looked for
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 68
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 61
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 46
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 43
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 40
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 31
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 30
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 26
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 24
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 18
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 16
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 9
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 8
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 8
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 0
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 285 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (8 bullish · 3 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
90.8%
Operating Margin
-15.3%
Net Margin
-16.8%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
-144.6%
ROA
-12.5%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$2.08
Cash
$296.08M
Total Debt
$342.85M
Current Ratio
0.98
Debt/Equity
6.03
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$21.30
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$15.19
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-28.7%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-5.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -5.0% | $47.38M | $43.47M |
| 2 | -3.1% | $45.90M | $38.63M |
| 3 | -1.2% | $45.33M | $35.00M |
| 4 | 0.6% | $45.61M | $32.31M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $46.75M | $30.38M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$49.87M
Terminal Value
$737.20M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$479.13M
Enterprise Value
$658.93M
Net Debt
$46.77M
Equity Value
$612.16M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$1.03
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$0.91
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 7 positive, 9 neutral, 4 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 23.9.2026
Benzinga · 21.9.2026
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
Benzinga · 21.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 7.9.2026
Yahoo · 25.8.2026
MarketBeat · 25.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 25.8.2026
Yahoo Finance Video · 19.8.2026
TMX Newsfile · 18.8.2026
Motley Fool · 14.8.2026
The Wall Street Journal · 13.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 12.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 11.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 11.8.2026
Zacks · 10.8.2026
Groupon, Inc. (GRPN) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 47/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
GRPN currently scores 47/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, GRPN's estimated fair value is $15.19, which is 28.7% below the current price of $21.30. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
GRPN's technical score is 66/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Free cash flow growth: 23.0%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Price is above the 200-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $15.19 vs. price $21.30 (-28.7%); Operating margin: -15.3% (negative); Net margin: -16.8% (negative).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for GRPN.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Netzly Kyle | Tax Withholding in Shares | 18.9.2026 | 37,943 | -2,865 | $19.08 |
| Netzly Kyle | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 18.9.2026 | 6,936 | -6,936 | — |
| Netzly Kyle | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 18.9.2026 | 40,808 | +6,936 | $19.08 |
| Rajkumar Aditya Vikram | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2026 | 77,500 | +77,500 | — |
| Rajkumar Aditya Vikram | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2026 | 77,500 | +77,500 | — |
| Rajkumar Aditya Vikram | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2026 | 77,500 | +77,500 | — |
| Netzly Kyle | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 30.7.2026 | 4,950 | +4,950 | — |
| Kashyap Rana | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 30.7.2026 | 14,374 | +14,374 | — |
| Netzly Kyle | Tax Withholding in Shares | 30.7.2026 | 2,045 | -2,045 | $27.89 |
| Netzly Kyle | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 30.7.2026 | 4,950 | -4,950 | — |
| Kashyap Rana | Tax Withholding in Shares | 30.7.2026 | 6,661 | -6,661 | $27.89 |
| Kashyap Rana | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 30.7.2026 | 14,374 | -14,374 | — |
| Kashyap Rana | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 30.7.2026 | 204,026 | +14,374 | — |
| Kashyap Rana | Tax Withholding in Shares | 30.7.2026 | 197,365 | -6,661 | $27.89 |
| Kashyap Rana | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 30.7.2026 | 159,869 | -14,374 | — |
| Netzly Kyle | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 30.7.2026 | 35,917 | +4,950 | — |
| Netzly Kyle | Tax Withholding in Shares | 30.7.2026 | 33,872 | -2,045 | $27.89 |
| Netzly Kyle | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 30.7.2026 | 55,050 | -4,950 | — |
| Shah Amit | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.7.2026 | 3,348 | +3,348 | — |
| Shah Amit | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.7.2026 | 16,488 | +3,348 | — |
| Senkypl Dusan | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 11.6.2026 | 3,062,500 | -3,062,500 | — |
| Bass Robert J | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 11.6.2026 | 6,174 | +6,174 | — |
| Senkypl Dusan | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.6.2026 | 3,062,500 | +3,062,500 | $6.00 |
| Leonsis Theodore | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 11.6.2026 | 6,685 | -6,685 | — |
| Bass Robert J | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.6.2026 | 13,140 | +13,140 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
13,127,934 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 11,818,861 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
64.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 68.0% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology