Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$22.24
▼ $0.22 (-1.0%)
Market data updated: 09/19 12:58 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$4.69B
Day Range
$22.12 - $22.40
52-Week Range
$20.48 - $29.01
Beta
—
Next Earnings
22.10.2026
Support
$22.03
Resistance
$24.92
GNTX is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
-23.4% (1Y)
Strengths: 9/29 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Leverage risk
Debt/equity: 0.00
Risk
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is eroding over time
Quality
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
50
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
40
Quality
47
Value
55
Momentum
19
Risk
54
Sentiment
92
Fundamental
74
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Gentex Corporation (NASDAQ: GNTX) has highlighted its financial strength and growth ambitions. Analysts praise its undervalued stock—citing a low P/E ratio, strong return on invested capital, and zero debt—while emphasizing its steady expansion. The company announced a quarterly cash dividend of $0.12 per share, reinforcing its shareholder-friendly approach. During its Investor Day, Gentex outlined a $7 billion revenue target through automotive tech, diversified revenue streams (including VOXX and contract manufacturing), and strategic capital allocation. The event underscored its focus on long-term growth and operational efficiency.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Gentex Corporation. News trend score: 92. Reason: 9 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
17
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
37
Psychology
81
Fundamentals
74
Technical
19
Valuation
55
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-14%
Market Narrative
62
Fundamental Reality
37
Narrative Gap
+25
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant herding behavior reflects GNTX’s relative outperformance today amid peer declines, aligning traders’ actions despite weak momentum and neutral technicals. The narrative gap (24 points) hints at a disconnect between positive sentiment (98/100) and lagging price action, which may fuel herd-driven buying. Low FOMO and euphoria scores suggest caution, but the absence of panic or loss aversion signals keeps traders cautiously aligned. The key question: *Will the gap between narrative and reality widen, or will herding sustain despite weak fundamentals?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 05:05 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Gentex Corp (GNTX) shines in Best Dividend screen with sustainable 2.04% yield, strong profitability/health scores"
"Gentex outlined its strategy to expand vehicle content, build non-automotive revenue streams"
"GENTEX (GNTX) offers solid value: P/E of 11.3, strong ROIC, zero debt, and steady growth"
"Gentex Investor Day to Focus on Long-Term Growth, Capital Allocation"
📈 13D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 93/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 21/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for GNTX reflects a clash between defensive, long-term value approaches and more speculative or market-neutral frameworks. Methodologies like Walter Bagehot’s liquidity focus and Benjamin Graham’s defensive investor criteria both assign high scores (90 and 79, respectively), suggesting the stock’s stability and undervaluation could appeal to those prioritizing capital preservation or margin-of-safety investing. Meanwhile, patient compounders such as Morgan Housel and Edgar Lawrence Smith (scores of 73 and 71) see it as a quiet, decade-long hold—aligning with their emphasis on steady growth and patience. However, more nuanced or cyclical investors like Howard Marks (57) and Gerald Loeb (71) temper enthusiasm, warning of potentially elevated expectations or mid-cycle risks. At the opposite end, methodologies like Philip Fisher’s quality-growth focus (37) and Peter Lynch’s growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar (31) dismiss it outright, while speculative or contrarian approaches—such as Thorstein Veblen’s (24) or Jesse Livermore’s (20)—flag red flags like trend resistance or growth-chasing behavior. The split underscores whether the stock’s fundamentals justify its appeal to patient, value-oriented investors or if its risks outweigh its rewards for more active or growth-driven strategies.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 93
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 90
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 81
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 78
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 76
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 73
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 71
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 64
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 59
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 59
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 48
Some discount, but not the deep 'net-net' bargain Graham's enterprising bar sets
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 46
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 37
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 31
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 24
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 21
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 282 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 9 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
34.2%
Operating Margin
18.7%
Net Margin
15.2%
EBITDA Margin
22.8%
ROE
15.5%
ROA
13.1%
ROIC
—
EPS
$1.74
Cash
$145.65M
Total Debt
$3.80M
Current Ratio
2.91
Debt/Equity
0.00
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 8.7.2026 | $0.120 |
| 7.7.2026 | $0.120 |
| 8.4.2026 | $0.120 |
| 7.4.2026 | $0.120 |
| 7.1.2026 | $0.120 |
| 6.1.2026 | $0.120 |
| 8.10.2025 | $0.120 |
| 7.10.2025 | $0.120 |
| 9.7.2025 | $0.120 |
| 8.7.2025 | $0.120 |
| 9.4.2025 | $0.120 |
| 8.4.2025 | $0.120 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$11.42
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$8.91
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 9 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
ChartMill · 1.9.2026
Yahoo · 31.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 31.8.2026
Yahoo · 28.8.2026
MarketBeat · 28.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 27.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 27.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 24.8.2026
Yahoo · 20.8.2026
MT Newswires · 20.8.2026
ChartMill · 14.8.2026
Benzinga · 10.8.2026
Yahoo · 7.8.2026
Argus Research · 4.8.2026
Yahoo · 31.7.2026
ChartMill · 30.7.2026
Just Auto · 29.7.2026
Yahoo · 29.7.2026
SeekingAlpha · 28.7.2026
Gentex Corporation (GNTX) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 50/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
GNTX currently scores 50/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
GNTX's technical score is 19/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Debt/equity: 0.00; Current ratio: 2.91; Net margin: 15.2% — strong.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is eroding over time; Calmar: -0.26 (3y annualized return -11.6% / max drawdown 44.2%); Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -1.1%.
Yes — GNTX has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 5 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BROWN LESLIE L | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 5,626 | +5,626 | — |
| Schaum Richard O | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 5,626 | +5,626 | — |
| DEUR GARTH | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 5,626 | +5,626 | — |
| Pink Billy | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 5,626 | +5,626 | — |
| Starkoff Kathleen | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 5,626 | +5,626 | — |
| WALKER BRIAN C | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 5,626 | +5,626 | — |
| Zang Ling | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 5,626 | +5,626 | — |
| KENNEDY JOHN C | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 5,626 | +5,626 | — |
| KENNEDY JOHN C | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 5,626 | +5,626 | — |
| WALKER BRIAN C | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 29,831 | +5,626 | — |
| DEUR GARTH | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 20,045 | +5,626 | — |
| Schaum Richard O | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 87,069 | +5,626 | — |
| BROWN LESLIE L | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 41,988 | +5,626 | — |
| Starkoff Kathleen | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 36,770 | +5,626 | — |
| Zang Ling | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 35,599 | +5,626 | — |
| Pink Billy | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 15,329 | +5,626 | — |
| WALKER BRIAN C | Open Market Sale | 15.5.2026 | 5,939 | -5,939 | $22.98 |
| ANDERSON JOSEPH B JR | Open Market Sale | 15.5.2026 | 5,939 | -5,939 | $22.98 |
| WALKER BRIAN C | Open Market Sale | 15.5.2026 | 24,205 | -5,939 | $22.98 |
| ANDERSON JOSEPH B JR | Open Market Sale | 15.5.2026 | 0 | -5,939 | $22.98 |
| BROWN LESLIE L | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 5.5.2026 | 7,000 | +7,000 | — |
| BROWN LESLIE L | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 5.5.2026 | 7,000 | +7,000 | — |
| BROWN LESLIE L | Open Market Sale | 5.5.2026 | 10,782 | -10,782 | $22.85 |
| BROWN LESLIE L | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 5.5.2026 | 7,000 | +7,000 | $18.70 |
| BROWN LESLIE L | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 5.5.2026 | 7,000 | +7,000 | $15.74 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
16,922,527 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 15,268,765 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
69.8% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 67.4% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology