Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Industrials · ·
$41.50
▲ $0.27 (+0.7%)
Market data updated: 09/26 08:53 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/26/2026
News analyzed: 09/26/2026
Market Cap
$1.58B
Day Range
$41.23 - $41.95
52-Week Range
$26.40 - $42.40
Beta
—
Next Earnings
26.10.2026
Support
$33.50
Resistance
$42.40
GIC is a stock from the Industrials sector — Manufacturing, aerospace, defense, and infrastructure — closely tied to capital-investment cycles and economic growth.
+14.3% (1Y)
Strengths: 20/31 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Free cash flow growth
Free cash flow growth: 59.3%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $33.05 vs. price $41.50 (-20.4%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (70/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (38/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
66
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
today · $41.50
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 10 to 39 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of September 26, 2026
Then
66
$41.50
Now
66
$41.50
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
70
Quality
47
Value
38
Momentum
89
Risk
54
Sentiment
68
Fundamental
69
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Global Industrial Company has focused on its dividend performance, with multiple sources highlighting its status as a dividend-paying stock amid broader industry analyses. The company also gained attention for corporate partnerships, including its collaboration with Richard Childress Racing for a charity initiative and its participation in the Independent Hotel Show Miami 2026, showcasing hospitality solutions. Additionally, a subsidiary, Axoflow, was recognized as a finalist in a tech security award. No major financial or operational crises were reported.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Global Industrial Company. News trend score: 68. Reason: 7 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 4 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
35
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
37
Psychology
70
Fundamentals
69
Technical
89
Valuation
38
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+19%
Market Narrative
65
Fundamental Reality
37
Narrative Gap
+28
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant Anchoring state (63) reflects traders fixating on the 1.8% resistance gap, likely treating it as a psychological barrier. Euphoria (35) and Overconfidence (23) coexist, as the stock trades 21% above DCF and momentum outpaces fundamentals, signaling potential detachment from intrinsic value. The narrative gap (31) widens reality (36) from optimism (67), suggesting traders may overlook risks. The key question: *Will traders break the resistance anchor, or will momentum sustain euphoria despite valuation gaps?*
Updated: 09/08/2026, 06:15 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Global Industrial Co's Dividend Analysis"
"Axoflow Named Finalist in SiliconANGLE's 2026 TechForward Awards"
"Global Industrial and Richard Childress Racing Highlight K9s For Warriors Station Dog Program"
"5 Revealing Analyst Questions From Global Industrial’s Q2 Earnings Call"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Morgan Housel — 85/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 3/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock’s starkly divergent scores reflect deep philosophical divides among the methodologies. Morgan Housel’s high score suggests a quiet, long-term growth play that aligns with his patient-compounding principles, while Samuel Armstrong Nelson’s near-zero score flags it as overbought—highlighting a tension between growth potential and valuation risk. The middle tier—from Gerald Loeb’s moderate risk assessment to Peter Lynch’s failure to meet his ‘growth-at-a-reasonable-price’ threshold—shows a consensus that the stock isn’t a slam dunk, though some see room for cautious holding. Meanwhile, Benjamin Graham’s near-total rejection (21) contrasts sharply with Philip Fisher’s (39), illustrating whether the stock’s fundamentals or market psychology are the deciding factors. The split between Fisher’s quality-focused skepticism and Marks’ late-cycle caution underscores whether this is a business with hidden upside or a speculative bubble.
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 85
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 73
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟢 70
Positive trend — the price action Livermore looked for
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 68
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 65
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 62
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 50
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 48
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 47
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 47
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 45
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 39
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 32
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 31
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 3
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 285 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (10 bullish · 1 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
35.5%
Operating Margin
7.1%
Net Margin
5.2%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
23.0%
ROA
12.4%
ROIC
—
EPS
$1.86
Cash
$67.50M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
2.22
Debt/Equity
0.00
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 17.8.2026 | $0.280 |
| 18.5.2026 | $0.280 |
| 17.5.2026 | $0.280 |
| 9.3.2026 | $0.280 |
| 8.3.2026 | $0.280 |
| 10.11.2025 | $0.260 |
| 9.11.2025 | $0.260 |
| 11.8.2025 | $0.260 |
| 10.8.2025 | $0.260 |
| 12.5.2025 | $0.260 |
| 11.5.2025 | $0.260 |
| 10.3.2025 | $0.260 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$41.50
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$33.05
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-20.4%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
5.8%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.8% | $79.02M | $72.49M |
| 2 | 5.0% | $82.94M | $69.81M |
| 3 | 4.1% | $86.37M | $66.70M |
| 4 | 3.3% | $89.24M | $63.22M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $91.47M | $59.45M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$74.70M
Terminal Value
$1.44B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$937.50M
Enterprise Value
$1.27B
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$1.27B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$8.20
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$7.58
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 7 positive, 9 neutral, 4 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 26.9.2026
Yahoo · 25.9.2026
Yahoo · 23.9.2026
StockStory · 23.9.2026
Business Wire · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
StockStory · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
StockStory · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
Zacks · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Zacks · 4.9.2026
Business Wire · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
Business Wire · 2.9.2026
Business Wire · 31.8.2026
StockStory · 24.8.2026
StockStory · 21.8.2026
Global Industrial Company (GIC) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 66/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
GIC currently scores 66/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, GIC's estimated fair value is $33.05, which is 20.4% below the current price of $41.50. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
GIC's technical score is 89/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Free cash flow growth: 59.3%; Return on equity (ROE): 23.0% — strong; Debt/equity: 0.00.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $33.05 vs. price $41.50 (-20.4%); Operating margin is eroding over time; Calmar: 0.17 (3y annualized return 9.4% / max drawdown 54.8%).
Yes — GIC has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 6 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AXMACHER THOMAS | Other Transaction | 3.9.2027 | 250 | +250 | $37.33 |
| Tomey Alex | Other Transaction | 3.9.2026 | 24,781 | +376 | $33.20 |
| Clark Thomas Eugene | Other Transaction | 3.9.2026 | 68,355 | +334 | $37.33 |
| Tomey Alex | Other Transaction | 3.9.2026 | 376 | +376 | $33.20 |
| Clark Thomas Eugene | Other Transaction | 3.9.2026 | 334 | +334 | $37.33 |
| Hughes Claudia | Open Market Sale | 28.8.2026 | 35,090 | -1,830 | $40.00 |
| Hughes Claudia | Open Market Sale | 28.8.2026 | 32,167 | -2,923 | $39.64 |
| Hughes Claudia | Open Market Sale | 28.8.2026 | 2,923 | -2,923 | $39.64 |
| Hughes Claudia | Open Market Sale | 28.8.2026 | 1,830 | -1,830 | $40.00 |
| Hughes Claudia | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 36,920 | -1,734 | $38.22 |
| Tomey Alex | Tax Withholding in Shares | 27.8.2026 | 24,405 | -3,362 | $39.62 |
| Clark Thomas Eugene | Tax Withholding in Shares | 27.8.2026 | 68,021 | -4,210 | $39.62 |
| AXMACHER THOMAS | Tax Withholding in Shares | 27.8.2026 | 5,834 | -580 | $39.62 |
| Hughes Claudia | Tax Withholding in Shares | 27.8.2026 | 38,654 | -2,596 | $39.62 |
| ARMSTRONG LISA | Tax Withholding in Shares | 27.8.2026 | 18,275 | -3,405 | $39.62 |
| ADINA STORCH | Tax Withholding in Shares | 27.8.2026 | 33,353 | -3,729 | $39.62 |
| Shetty Manoj | Tax Withholding in Shares | 27.8.2026 | 33,757 | -4,002 | $39.62 |
| ARMSTRONG LISA | Tax Withholding in Shares | 27.8.2026 | 3,405 | -3,405 | $39.62 |
| ADINA STORCH | Tax Withholding in Shares | 27.8.2026 | 3,729 | -3,729 | $39.62 |
| AXMACHER THOMAS | Tax Withholding in Shares | 27.8.2026 | 580 | -580 | $39.62 |
| Tomey Alex | Tax Withholding in Shares | 27.8.2026 | 3,362 | -3,362 | $39.62 |
| Hughes Claudia | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 1,734 | -1,734 | $38.22 |
| Hughes Claudia | Tax Withholding in Shares | 27.8.2026 | 2,596 | -2,596 | $39.62 |
| Clark Thomas Eugene | Tax Withholding in Shares | 27.8.2026 | 4,210 | -4,210 | $39.62 |
| Shetty Manoj | Tax Withholding in Shares | 27.8.2026 | 4,002 | -4,002 | $39.62 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
622,206 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 619,837 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
74.9% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 67.9% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology