Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Industrials · ·
$82.53
▼ $1.17 (-1.4%)
Market data updated: 09/15 03:10 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/15/2026
News analyzed: 09/15/2026
Market Cap
$968.60M
Day Range
$82.25 - $85.69
52-Week Range
$49.19 - $125.82
Beta
—
Next Earnings
05.11.2026
GHM is a stock from the Industrials sector — Manufacturing, aerospace, defense, and infrastructure — closely tied to capital-investment cycles and economic growth.
+60.4% (1Y)
Strengths: 5/32 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is stable or improving over time
Quality
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$0.81 vs. price $82.53 (-101.0%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 1 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 1
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
43
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
53
Quality
63
Value
33
Momentum
9
Risk
48
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
46
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Graham Corporation (NYSE: GHM) has primarily focused on its strong financial performance in Q1 2027, highlighting record revenue and a robust backlog. The company’s earnings call emphasized effective execution and growth, while headlines noted its stock trading down alongside peers in the engineered components and systems sector. Additionally, Graham announced a leadership addition to support its growth phase, and analysts discussed speculative options activity suggesting potential stock volatility.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Graham Corporation. News trend score: 100. Reason: 12 of the last 19 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
25
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
89
Fundamentals
46
Technical
9
Valuation
33
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
-29%
Market Narrative
53
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+11
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
Market behavior suggests a **narrative-reality gap** (53 vs. 42) where extreme positive sentiment (100/100) clashes with weak technicals—low momentum, subdued volume, and neutral RSI. The dominant psychological state is ambiguous, but **herding** (35) stands out as the highest score, driven by today’s outperformance relative to peers. This implies traders may be following peers’ relative strength rather than fundamentals or momentum. The key open question: *Will this outperformance persist, or will sentiment-driven buying fade as technicals worsen?*
Updated: 09/08/2026, 02:19 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Graham Corporation (GHM) Q1 2027 earnings call highlights record revenue and backlog"
"Allient, Mayville Engineering, Graham Corporation... stocks trade down"
"Graham Corporation announces leadership addition to support growth phase"
"Strong execution drove Graham Corp. (GHM) higher"
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 94/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 6/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock splits methodologies into two starkly opposing camps: a handful of cyclical and trend-following investors see strong potential, while the majority of value, growth, and defensive strategists flag it as risky or unattractive. Samuel Armstrong Nelson and Charles Mackay’s near-unanimous favorability—especially Nelson’s high score—suggests this stock may be in an oversold or early-cycle phase, where crowd psychology hasn’t yet driven prices to unsustainable levels. Meanwhile, Jack Schwager and Howard Marks (Market Cycle) back it as a disciplined, reward-rich setup, contrasting sharply with the near-universal skepticism of Fisher, Graham, and Lynch, who dismiss it for lacking growth, quality, or margin-of-safety. The divide underscores whether GHM’s volatility and market positioning align with speculative momentum (favored by Schwager or Livermore’s trend followers) or whether its fundamentals or valuation simply don’t meet the rigorous standards of patient, defensive, or growth-oriented investors.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 94
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 76
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 75
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 71
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 68
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 58
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 39
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 39
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 39
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 35
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 32
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 31
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 28
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 20
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 20
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 6
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 277 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 11 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
23.5%
Operating Margin
6.1%
Net Margin
5.1%
EBITDA Margin
9.3%
ROE
8.9%
ROA
3.9%
ROIC
—
EPS
$1.14
Cash
$6.58M
Total Debt
$13.00M
Current Ratio
1.00
Debt/Equity
0.09
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 8.11.2021 | $0.110 |
| 7.11.2021 | $0.110 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$82.53
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$0.81
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-101.0%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
16.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 16.0% | $-140.39K | $-128.80K |
| 2 | 12.6% | $-158.15K | $-133.11K |
| 3 | 9.3% | $-172.79K | $-133.43K |
| 4 | 5.9% | $-182.96K | $-129.61K |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-187.53K | $-121.88K |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-121.00K
Terminal Value
$-2.96M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-1.92M
Enterprise Value
$-2.57M
Net Debt
$6.42M
Equity Value
$-8.99M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$12.60
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$5.71
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 12 positive, 6 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 19 articles.
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
Yahoo · 24.8.2026
StockStory · 24.8.2026
StockStory · 18.8.2026
Motley Fool · 13.8.2026
Zacks · 12.8.2026
Business Wire · 10.8.2026
MarketBeat · 8.8.2026
Insider Monkey · 7.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 6.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 6.8.2026
Zacks · 6.8.2026
StockStory · 6.8.2026
ChartMill · 6.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 6.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 6.8.2026
Benzinga · 6.8.2026
Benzinga · 5.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 4.8.2026
Graham Corporation (GHM) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 43/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
GHM currently scores 43/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, GHM's estimated fair value is -$0.81, which is 101.0% below the current price of $82.53. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
GHM's technical score is 9/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Debt/equity: 0.09; Revenue growth (last year): 16.9%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$0.81 vs. price $82.53 (-101.0%); ATR: 5.7% of price; Free cash flow growth: -102.3%.
Yes — GHM has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gregorio Mauro | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 2.9.2026 | 936 | -936 | — |
| Gregorio Mauro | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 2.9.2026 | 936 | +936 | — |
| Scholes Richard Alan | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.8.2026 | 1,563 | +1,563 | — |
| Scholes Richard Alan | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.8.2026 | 3,678 | +3,678 | — |
| Scholes Richard Alan | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.8.2026 | 1,563 | +1,563 | — |
| Scholes Richard Alan | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.8.2026 | 3,678 | +3,678 | — |
| Thoren Daniel J. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 8.6.2026 | 8,095 | -8,095 | $95.34 |
| Thome Christopher J. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 8.6.2026 | 3,193 | -3,193 | $95.34 |
| Malone Matthew | Tax Withholding in Shares | 8.6.2026 | 2,477 | -2,477 | $95.34 |
| Thome Christopher J. | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.6.2026 | 8,619 | +8,619 | — |
| Malone Matthew | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.6.2026 | 8,619 | +8,619 | — |
| Thoren Daniel J. | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.6.2026 | 22,101 | +22,101 | — |
| Malone Matthew | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.6.2026 | 66,106 | +8,619 | — |
| Malone Matthew | Tax Withholding in Shares | 8.6.2026 | 63,629 | -2,477 | $95.34 |
| Thoren Daniel J. | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.6.2026 | 383,040 | +22,101 | — |
| Thoren Daniel J. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 8.6.2026 | 374,945 | -8,095 | $95.34 |
| Thome Christopher J. | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.6.2026 | 39,181 | +8,619 | — |
| Thome Christopher J. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 8.6.2026 | 35,988 | -3,193 | $95.34 |
| Malone Matthew | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.6.2026 | 1,291 | -1,291 | — |
| Thome Christopher J. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.6.2026 | 1,643 | +1,643 | — |
| Thome Christopher J. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 4.6.2026 | 608 | -608 | $107.96 |
| Malone Matthew | Tax Withholding in Shares | 4.6.2026 | 371 | -371 | $107.96 |
| Thoren Daniel J. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 4.6.2026 | 1,593 | -1,593 | $107.96 |
| Thome Christopher J. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.6.2026 | 1,643 | -1,643 | — |
| Thoren Daniel J. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.6.2026 | 5,543 | -5,543 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
834,961 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 727,970 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
62.7% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 59.5% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology