Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Industrials · ·
$92.76
▼ $3.27 (-3.4%)
Market data updated: 09/16 12:37 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/16/2026
News analyzed: 09/16/2026
Market Cap
$4.20B
Day Range
$91.99 - $94.03
52-Week Range
$65.01 - $108.57
Beta
—
Next Earnings
17.11.2026
GFF is a stock from the Industrials sector — Manufacturing, aerospace, defense, and infrastructure — closely tied to capital-investment cycles and economic growth.
+21.0% (1Y)
Strengths: 6/32 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is stable or improving over time
Quality
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $60.31 vs. price $92.76 (-35.0%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 1 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 1
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
42
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
26
Quality
58
Value
33
Momentum
23
Risk
50
Sentiment
86
Fundamental
54
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Griffon Corporation (GFF) has centered on its financial and market momentum, with analysts predicting a **27.77% upside** in its stock price. The company issued an **$800 million debt deal**, which was framed as a strategic move to strengthen its balance sheet. Insider selling activity, including a notable transaction by executive Mehmel, was also highlighted. While broader industry comparisons and dividend status were briefly mentioned, the focus remained on Griffon’s stock performance, debt restructuring, and analyst optimism amid market speculation.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Griffon Corporation. News trend score: 86. Reason: 6 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
30
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
40
Psychology
45
Fundamentals
54
Technical
23
Valuation
33
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
-0%
Market Narrative
63
Fundamental Reality
40
Narrative Gap
+23
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant **Overconfidence** (45) reflects a disconnect between price action and fundamentals, where investors appear detached from the stock’s underperformance relative to EPS growth and elevated valuation. The **narrative gap** (+18) further suggests selective optimism, despite weak operational metrics (flat revenue, shrinking margins). Herding (43) is muted, as the stock lags peers, implying selective participation rather than blind following. The key question is whether this overconfidence persists despite lagging fundamentals or if it signals an impending re-evaluation as valuation gaps widen. The absence of panic or anchoring suggests no immediate defensive shift, but the **narrative-reality divergence** could become a focal point for skepticism.
Updated: 09/08/2026, 08:49 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Wall Street Analysts Predict a 27.77% Upside in Griffon (GFF)"
"Griffon (GFF) Issued $800 Million In Notes"
"Here's Why Momentum in Griffon (GFF) Should Keep Going"
📈 3D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 93/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham — 15/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among historical methodologies, with some seeing cautious optimism and others outright red flags. Samuel Armstrong Nelson and Charles Mackay both lean favorably, with Nelson’s cycle analysis suggesting it’s near oversold territory and Mackay detecting no crowd-driven mania—both signals that align with contrarian or crowd-aware approaches. In contrast, the efficient-market camp and Howard Marks (Market Cycle) are lukewarm, viewing the stock as neither a clear outlier nor a strong index alternative, reflecting a pragmatic skepticism toward active stock-picking. Meanwhile, the lowest-scoring methodologies—like Fisher, Lynch, and Graham—reject it outright, dismissing it for lacking growth potential, valuation discipline, or defensive qualities, while volatility-focused thinkers like Housel and Livermore warn of trend resistance or emotional traps. The split highlights a tension between cyclical/contrarian views and strict valuation or trend-following rules.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 93
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 57
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 55
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 46
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 44
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 42
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 39
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 39
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 36
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 34
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 29
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 21
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 18
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 17
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 15
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 278 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 9 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
42.0%
Operating Margin
8.2%
Net Margin
2.0%
EBITDA Margin
9.8%
ROE
69.1%
ROA
2.5%
ROIC
—
EPS
$1.13
Cash
$99.05M
Total Debt
$1.41B
Current Ratio
2.66
Debt/Equity
19.09
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 31.8.2026 | $0.220 |
| 29.5.2026 | $0.220 |
| 28.5.2026 | $0.220 |
| 27.2.2026 | $0.220 |
| 26.2.2026 | $0.220 |
| 28.11.2025 | $0.220 |
| 27.11.2025 | $0.220 |
| 29.8.2025 | $0.180 |
| 28.8.2025 | $0.180 |
| 30.5.2025 | $0.180 |
| 29.5.2025 | $0.180 |
| 25.2.2025 | $0.180 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$92.76
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$60.31
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-35.0%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-4.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -4.0% | $292.83M | $268.65M |
| 2 | -2.4% | $285.89M | $240.63M |
| 3 | -0.7% | $283.75M | $219.11M |
| 4 | 0.9% | $286.24M | $202.78M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $293.40M | $190.69M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$305.00M
Terminal Value
$4.63B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$3.01B
Enterprise Value
$4.13B
Net Debt
$1.31B
Equity Value
$2.82B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$1.58
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$13.00
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 6 positive, 14 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 7.9.2026
Zacks · 7.9.2026
Yahoo · 7.9.2026
Zacks · 7.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
Zacks · 2.9.2026
Zacks · 26.8.2026
Zacks · 26.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 21.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 21.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 21.8.2026
Motley Fool · 20.8.2026
StockStory · 20.8.2026
MT Newswires · 18.8.2026
Business Wire · 18.8.2026
Griffon Corporation (GFF) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 42/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
GFF currently scores 42/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, GFF's estimated fair value is $60.31, which is 35.0% below the current price of $92.76. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
GFF's technical score is 23/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Return on equity (ROE): 69.1% — strong; Current ratio: 2.66.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $60.31 vs. price $92.76 (-35.0%); Revenue growth (last year): -3.9%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -74.2%.
Yes — GFF has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 25 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sullivan Kevin F | Open Market Sale | 13.8.2026 | 40,602 | -3,500 | $105.59 |
| TURNBULL CHERYL L | Open Market Sale | 13.8.2026 | 3,000 | -3,000 | $106.12 |
| Sullivan Kevin F | Open Market Sale | 13.8.2026 | 3,500 | -3,500 | $105.59 |
| MEHMEL ROBERT F | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 723,032 | -3,240 | $107.16 |
| MEHMEL ROBERT F | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 3,240 | -3,240 | $107.16 |
| MEHMEL ROBERT F | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 729,273 | -3,638 | $104.08 |
| MEHMEL ROBERT F | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 726,272 | -88 | $105.21 |
| MEHMEL ROBERT F | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 726,360 | -2,913 | $104.64 |
| MEHMEL ROBERT F | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 2,913 | -2,913 | $104.64 |
| MEHMEL ROBERT F | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 3,638 | -3,638 | $104.08 |
| MEHMEL ROBERT F | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 88 | -88 | $105.21 |
| Harris Brian G | Open Market Sale | 7.8.2026 | 128,649 | -5,267 | $107.11 |
| MEHMEL ROBERT F | Open Market Sale | 7.8.2026 | 733,464 | -13,464 | $107.43 |
| MEHMEL ROBERT F | Open Market Sale | 7.8.2026 | 746,928 | -1,911 | $106.60 |
| MEHMEL ROBERT F | Open Market Sale | 7.8.2026 | 732,911 | -553 | $108.09 |
| MEHMEL ROBERT F | Open Market Sale | 7.8.2026 | 1,911 | -1,911 | $106.60 |
| MEHMEL ROBERT F | Open Market Sale | 7.8.2026 | 13,464 | -13,464 | $107.43 |
| Harris Brian G | Open Market Sale | 7.8.2026 | 5,267 | -5,267 | $107.11 |
| MEHMEL ROBERT F | Open Market Sale | 7.8.2026 | 553 | -553 | $108.09 |
| MEHMEL ROBERT F | Open Market Sale | 6.8.2026 | 763,533 | -158 | $102.03 |
| MEHMEL ROBERT F | Open Market Sale | 6.8.2026 | 748,839 | -2,074 | $106.27 |
| MEHMEL ROBERT F | Open Market Sale | 6.8.2026 | 763,322 | -211 | $103.52 |
| MEHMEL ROBERT F | Open Market Sale | 6.8.2026 | 750,913 | -6,933 | $105.46 |
| MEHMEL ROBERT F | Open Market Sale | 6.8.2026 | 757,846 | -5,476 | $104.56 |
| MEHMEL ROBERT F | Open Market Sale | 6.8.2026 | 2,074 | -2,074 | $106.27 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,682,701 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 1,615,031 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
65.4% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 71.5% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology