Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· · NASDAQ
$232.58
▲ $8.67 (+3.9%)
Market data updated: 09/18 09:06 AM
News analyzed: 09/18/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$230.71 - $233.65
52-Week Range
$108.28 - $297.36
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
+119.2% (1Y)
⚠️ Insufficient data for a reliable StockIQ Score
Only 3 of 7 categories available — Fundamental, Growth, Valuation, Quality unavailable.
Strengths: 8/14 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟢 Bullish
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is above the 50-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Relative strength vs. S&P 500
-17.0% over the last 3 months relative to the index
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
FTXL’s overall investor score of 60 reflects a mixed technical and risk profile, tempered by a strong positive news sentiment. The technical category scores 52, where the stock shows conflicting signals: while it sits above the 200-day average and exhibits positive momentum (MACD and RSI), it remains below the 50-day average and the SAR point, signaling a downtrend. Falling volume despite price gains further raises concerns about potential weakening momentum. The news category scores exceptionally high at 86, driven by a series of positive thematic updates and industry-specific narratives, particularly around semiconductor and data center trends, which may be bolstering investor confidence. However, the risk category scores 50, reflecting volatility metrics (ATR: 3.6%) and a historically volatile performance (Calmar ratio: 1.11), indicating higher risk relative to returns. The combination of technical caution and elevated risk, despite strong news sentiment, keeps the overall score moderate.
The stock exhibits mixed technical signals: positive momentum (MACD, RSI) but remains below critical moving averages (50-day) and SAR, with declining volume.
This suggests potential short-term weakness despite underlying momentum, which could impact near-term price stability.
All recent news items are positive, focusing on thematic ETFs, semiconductor trends, and data center strength, indicating strong narrative support.
Positive news can drive investor sentiment and volume, but its impact depends on execution and market conditions.
The stock displays moderate volatility (ATR: 3.6%) and a historically volatile performance (Calmar ratio: 1.11), with a 41.8% max drawdown over 3 years.
This highlights the potential for significant price swings, which may deter risk-averse investors.
StockIQ conclusion
FTXL’s moderate investor score reflects a balance of technical caution and strong narrative support, tempered by elevated risk. While positive momentum and thematic news provide potential upside, the stock’s short-term technical weaknesses and volatility suggest caution. Investors should monitor volume trends and sector-specific developments to assess whether the current mixed signals shift toward clearer momentum.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
77
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
73
Risk
50
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of the **First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL)** has centered on semiconductor sector volatility, AI-driven demand, and valuation concerns. Headlines highlight broad tech sector fluctuations—including Marvell Technology’s mixed performance amid Google deal speculation and valuation debates—while broader themes like AI’s expanding economic impact and supply chain dynamics shape investor focus. Analysts also discuss FTXL’s positioning in the semiconductor space, noting risks tied to sector-wide trends and crude oil price influences.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF. News trend score: 100. Reason: 16 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
29
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
60
Fundamentals
—
Technical
73
Valuation
—
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
-20%
Market Narrative
70
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+20
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
FTXL’s psychology score (31) is driven by **euphoria**, consistent with a stock trading well above its 200-day average (+19.1%) and high positive sentiment (86/100). The narrative gap (9 points) hints at a disconnect where optimism may outpace fundamentals, but neutral RSI (50) and modest momentum (+0.5% ROC) temper extreme exuberance. The key question is whether this outperformance reflects justified growth or speculative overvaluation. Low panic selling (0) and muted volatility (0.71x ATR) suggest no immediate liquidation pressure, but the absence of herding or overconfidence indicators keeps the rally grounded in individual conviction rather than collective frenzy.
Updated: 09/07/2026, 11:55 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"AI’s value chain continues to expand as adoption deepens"
"See how 2X leveraged ETFs MUU and MULL are amplifying the AI memory boom"
"winners are beginning to separate amongst supply constraints"
"How Much of Your Portfolio Should Actually Be in FTXL"
📈 7D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Jesse Livermore — 53/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 17/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark contrast between methodologies here reveals a stock that either lacks sufficient data for rigorous analysis or presents ambiguous signals across different investor frameworks. Charles Mackay’s high score suggests a speculative bubble forming, as his model flags crowd excitement, while the efficient-market proponents (Malkiel/Bogle) and Livermore’s trend-based approach both lean neutral, questioning whether active selection adds value. Meanwhile, the majority—including Graham, Fisher, Lynch, and Veblen—return mid-range scores due to insufficient fundamental or valuation data, leaving their models unable to form a definitive opinion. Marks and Housel, however, paint a cautionary picture, with Marks warning of risk/valuation red flags and Housel’s low score signaling volatility that could deter patient investors. The divergence underscores whether FTXL’s behavior stems from speculative hype (Mackay) or structural market conditions (Marks/Housel) rather than a clear investment thesis.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 58
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 53
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 49
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 42
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 39
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 36
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 20
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 19
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 17
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 276 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (8 bullish · 3 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 25.6.2026 | $0.036 |
| 26.3.2026 | $0.013 |
| 12.12.2025 | $0.120 |
| 25.9.2025 | $0.077 |
| 26.6.2025 | $0.137 |
| 27.3.2025 | $0.034 |
| 13.12.2024 | $0.166 |
| 26.9.2024 | $0.102 |
| 27.6.2024 | $0.125 |
| 21.3.2024 | $0.077 |
| 22.12.2023 | $0.166 |
| 22.9.2023 | $0.132 |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 16 positive, 2 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 11.9.2026
Benzinga · 10.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
Benzinga · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
etf.com · 8.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Zacks · 3.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 1.9.2026
Benzinga · 1.9.2026
Benzinga · 31.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 29.8.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for FTXL specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
FTXL's technical score is 73/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average; MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: -17.0% over the last 3 months relative to the index; %K 81.8 — overbought; Volume is falling despite the price advance — possible weakening.
Yes — FTXL has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 0 filings.
No recent insider transaction filings found for this stock.
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
475,940 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 489,794 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
39.3% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 43.2% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology