Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$12.81
▼ $0.06 (-0.5%)
Market data updated: 09/25 10:38 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/25/2026
News analyzed: 09/25/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$12.73 - $13.05
52-Week Range
$6.79 - $13.99
Beta
—
Next Earnings
03.11.2026
Support
$9.77
Resistance
$13.99
FRSH is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
-0.2% (1Y)
Strengths: 19/28 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟢 Bullish
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $18.20 vs. price $12.81 (+42.0%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: -0.18 (3y annualized return -12.9% / max drawdown 71.9%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
72
Today
75
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🔎 What Changed (vs. 30 days ago)
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
21d ago · $13.36
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
21d ago · $13.36
Evidence: 10 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 26, 2026
Then
75
$12.86
Now
72
$12.81
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
79
Quality
58
Value
62
Momentum
78
Risk
48
Sentiment
92
Fundamental
68
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Freshworks Inc. has primarily focused on its stock valuation and performance challenges. Analysts note the company’s shares have declined roughly 42% over three years, with current market multiples appearing expensive relative to its fundamentals. Additionally, a recent announcement highlighted a restricted stock grant to a newly appointed executive under Nasdaq’s listing rules, underscoring leadership changes. Overall, discussions emphasize investor skepticism about whether Freshworks can sustain growth and justify its premium valuation.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Freshworks Inc.. News trend score: 92. Reason: 10 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
28
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
41
Fundamentals
68
Technical
78
Valuation
62
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+30%
Market Narrative
49
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+7
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s psychology for FRSH is fragmented, with euphoria as the highest-scoring state despite a -34% discount to DCF. The 200-day outperformance (+23.7%) and extreme positive sentiment (100/100) suggest some investors remain bullish, possibly anchored to past highs or optimistic narratives. However, neutral RSI (44) and muted volume (0.62x average) temper overconfidence, while the lack of herding or panic signals a cautious, selective approach. The key question: *Is the euphoria driven by fundamental conviction or speculative positioning?*
Updated: 09/08/2026, 10:22 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"artificial intelligence is driving growth across enterprise software rather than threatening legacy business models"
"Freshworks stock has recovered somewhat... yet current market multiples screen as expensive"
"record quarterly billed revenue of $13.4M) in Q2 2026, representing a YoY increase of 23%"
📈 6D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 90/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jack Schwager — 31/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide between growth-oriented and value-driven methodologies. Peter Lynch and Samuel Armstrong Nelson both rate it near the top, seeing it as a high-growth opportunity—Lynch highlights undervaluation relative to its potential, while Nelson spots a favorable cycle position. Meanwhile, Philip Fisher and Walter Bagehot also endorse it, praising its quality and resilience, though with slightly lower scores. In contrast, value-focused investors like Benjamin Graham and the Enterprising Investor variant dismiss it outright, calling it neither cheap enough nor statistically compelling. The middle ground is occupied by mixed verdicts from Howard Marks and the efficient-market camp, suggesting the stock may already reflect high expectations or lack a clear edge over broader indices. This tension between growth enthusiasm and value skepticism creates a clear split in how the methodologies would approach this stock.
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 90
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 82
Exceptional company quality by Fisher's standards
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 78
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 69
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 57
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 54
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 50
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 50
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 50
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 48
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 47
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 47
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 45
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 42
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 31
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 283 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (8 bullish · 1 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
85.0%
Operating Margin
1.6%
Net Margin
21.9%
EBITDA Margin
4.7%
ROE
17.8%
ROA
11.5%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.63
Cash
$569.77M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
2.20
Debt/Equity
—
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$12.81
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$18.20
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+42.0%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
19.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 19.0% | $281.63M | $258.37M |
| 2 | 14.9% | $323.51M | $272.29M |
| 3 | 10.7% | $358.28M | $276.66M |
| 4 | 6.6% | $382.01M | $270.63M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $391.56M | $254.49M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$236.67M
Terminal Value
$6.17B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$4.01B
Enterprise Value
$5.35B
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$5.35B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$3.52
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$2.75
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 10 positive, 7 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
StockStory · 24.9.2026
Yahoo · 24.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
StockStory · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
MT Newswires · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 12.9.2026
StockStory · 12.9.2026
StockStory · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 3.9.2026
Zacks · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Freshworks Inc. (FRSH) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 72/100, rated "Strong". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
FRSH currently scores 72/100 (Strong) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, FRSH's estimated fair value is $18.20, which is 42.0% above the current price of $12.81. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
FRSH's technical score is 78/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $18.20 vs. price $12.81 (+42.0%); Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 296.9%; Free cash flow growth: 56.2%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: -0.18 (3y annualized return -12.9% / max drawdown 71.9%); MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum; Operating margin: 1.6% — weak.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for FRSH.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 2 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lawrence Philippa | Open Market Sale | 2.9.2026 | 389,296 | -52,767 | $13.25 |
| Lawrence Philippa | Open Market Sale | 2.9.2026 | 52,767 | -52,767 | $13.25 |
| Sloat Tyler | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.9.2026 | 1,740,146 | -6,072 | $13.46 |
| Woodside Dennis | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.9.2026 | 2,800,924 | -53,687 | $13.46 |
| Sloat Tyler | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.9.2026 | 1,724,453 | -4,565 | $13.46 |
| Lawrence Philippa | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.9.2026 | 442,063 | -14,081 | $13.46 |
| Sloat Tyler | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.9.2026 | 1,729,018 | -7,579 | $13.46 |
| Woodside Dennis | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.9.2026 | 2,776,872 | -8,873 | $13.46 |
| Woodside Dennis | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.9.2026 | 2,747,729 | -10,955 | $13.46 |
| Woodside Dennis | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.9.2026 | 2,785,745 | -15,179 | $13.46 |
| Manning Ryan | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 1,162,790 | +1,162,790 | — |
| Woodside Dennis | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.9.2026 | 2,758,684 | -18,188 | $13.46 |
| Sloat Tyler | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.9.2026 | 1,736,597 | -3,549 | $13.46 |
| Sloat Tyler | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.9.2026 | 4,565 | -4,565 | $13.46 |
| Woodside Dennis | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.9.2026 | 18,188 | -18,188 | $13.46 |
| Woodside Dennis | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.9.2026 | 8,873 | -8,873 | $13.46 |
| Woodside Dennis | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.9.2026 | 10,955 | -10,955 | $13.46 |
| Woodside Dennis | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.9.2026 | 15,179 | -15,179 | $13.46 |
| Sloat Tyler | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.9.2026 | 7,579 | -7,579 | $13.46 |
| Woodside Dennis | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.9.2026 | 53,687 | -53,687 | $13.46 |
| Sloat Tyler | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.9.2026 | 3,549 | -3,549 | $13.46 |
| Lawrence Philippa | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.9.2026 | 14,081 | -14,081 | $13.46 |
| Sloat Tyler | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.9.2026 | 6,072 | -6,072 | $13.46 |
| Manning Ryan | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 1,162,790 | +1,162,790 | — |
| Sloat Tyler | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.8.2026 | 10,734 | -10,734 | $11.36 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
22,191,890 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 23,351,954 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
62.9% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 57.1% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology