Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· · NYSE
$111.36
▲ $1.41 (+1.3%)
Market data updated: 09/17 11:02 PM
News analyzed: 09/17/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$111.35 - $111.97
52-Week Range
$77.72 - $120.45
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
+35.6% (1Y)
⚠️ Insufficient data for a reliable StockIQ Score
Only 3 of 7 categories available — Fundamental, Growth, Valuation, Quality unavailable.
Strengths: 9/14 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟢 Bullish
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 1.8% of price
Risk
Biggest negative driver
CMF (money flow)
CMF 20 days: -0.14
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
FITE’s overall investor score of 40, classified as 'WEAK,' reflects a mixed technical and risk profile overshadowed by near-term bearish signals, despite a relatively strong news sentiment. The technical category (score: 23) highlights conflicting signals: while the price remains above its 200-day average—a longer-term bullish anchor—the stock is below its 50-day average, exhibiting a short-term downtrend. The negative MACD histogram and RSI of 42.7 (weak/negative bias) further indicate declining momentum, though the oversold %K (14.6) suggests potential short-term relief. Meanwhile, the risk category (score: 58) reveals moderate volatility (ATR: 2.0%) and a historically volatile but high-return profile (Calmar: 1.36, with a 30.1% annualized return over three years but a 22.1% max drawdown). The news category (score: 74) stands out as a bright spot, with five positive articles emphasizing AI-driven economic growth, tech sector resilience, and forward-looking market signals, which could mitigate near-term technical concerns.
The stock is below its 50-day average and SAR point, with a negative MACD histogram and RSI of 42.7, signaling short-term downtrend pressure, though it remains above its 200-day average and is currently oversold (%K: 14.6).
Short-term technical indicators dominate the score, reflecting immediate bearish momentum that could pressure the stock unless reversed.
Five positive news items highlight AI’s economic impact, tech sector growth, and bullish market outlooks, all of which could support long-term fundamentals despite technical weakness.
Positive news sentiment provides a counterbalance to technical headwinds, suggesting external factors may offset near-term price pressures.
The stock exhibits moderate volatility (ATR: 2.0%) but has delivered strong annualized returns (30.1%) with a high drawdown (22.1%), indicating a volatile but historically rewarding profile.
The risk profile suggests potential for high returns but also underscores the need for caution due to past drawdowns and volatility.
StockIQ conclusion
FITE’s weak overall score reflects a technical downtrend and relative underperformance, tempered by strong news sentiment and long-term structural support. The stock’s volatility and past drawdowns highlight risk, but positive macroeconomic narratives around AI and tech could provide tailwinds. Without a reversal in technical indicators, the near-term outlook remains cautious, though external factors may shift the balance.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
82
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
79
Risk
58
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage on the **SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF**—a tech-focused fund—has centered on broader market trends rather than direct mentions of the ETF itself. Headlines highlight AI’s growing role in U.S. economic resilience, strong Q2 earnings across tech, and a rebound in tech stocks after volatility. The sector shows signs of recovery, with 75% of S&P 500 tech stocks surpassing their 200-day moving averages, while broader market disruptions (e.g., oil prices, Fed policy) have had limited lasting impact. The narrative emphasizes tech’s potential amid macroeconomic shifts.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF. News trend score: 100. Reason: 11 of the last 15 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
24
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
27
Fundamentals
—
Technical
79
Valuation
—
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+5%
Market Narrative
65
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+15
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
FITE’s psychology is *unresolved*—no single state dominates, but **euphoria** lingers due to its +10.4% premium over the 200-day average, despite weak momentum and neutral sentiment. The narrative gap (-2) hints at a disconnect: reality (realityScore 50) slightly outweighs optimism (narrativeScore 48), yet traders may cling to upside potential. The key question is whether this premium reflects *overvaluation* or *latent conviction*—evidenced by no panic or FOMO spikes. Subdued volatility (0.89x ATR) and muted volume (0.85x avg) suggest caution, not urgency.
Updated: 09/06/2026, 12:48 AM
👥 What the crowd believes
"AI is becoming a visible source of macroeconomic resilience, especially in the US, where investment and equity gains are helping offset weaker momentum elsewhere."
"With more than 1,500 companies already reporting their Q2 numbers, we can confidently say that this has been one of the strongest earnings seasons relative to expectations."
"The broader market backdrop is constructive despite disruptions like oil, inflation, and Fed uncertainty."
"At the end of last week, 75% of S&P 500 Technology stocks closed above their 200-DMAs for the first time in 219 trading days."
📈 8D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Morgan Housel — 72/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jack Schwager — 20/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for FITE reflects deep methodological differences in how these investors approach stock selection. Samuel Armstrong Nelson’s high score (89) and bullish cycle positioning suggest he sees this stock as undervalued relative to its historical price swings, while Jesse Livermore’s low score (36) and negative trend verdict aligns with his strict adherence to trading only in the direction of dominant market momentum—here, apparently unfavorable. Meanwhile, the mid-range scores from Morgan Housel (67) and Gerald M. Loeb (63) imply a cautious but open-minded view, with Housel favoring quiet, long-term growth and Loeb acknowledging moderate risk. The cluster of 'not enough data' verdicts (Graham, Fisher, Lynch, etc.) underscores that FITE lacks the traditional fundamentals or valuation clarity these methodologies demand, leaving them neutral or indecisive. Even Howard Marks’ mixed verdict (54) highlights the tension between a strong business model and potentially inflated expectations, while Jack Schwager’s neutral stance (44) reflects his reluctance to take a definitive position without clear technical or structural advantages.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 72
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 65
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 55
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 50
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 44
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 43
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 30
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 26
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 20
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 276 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (8 bullish · 2 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
A pattern consistent with an early/mid distribution phase — a trading range after an advance with declining volume.
Medium confidence
$102.49
Range Bottom
$120.45
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 22.6.2026 | $0.011 |
| 23.3.2026 | $0.028 |
| 22.12.2025 | $0.039 |
| 22.9.2025 | $0.065 |
| 23.6.2025 | $0.043 |
| 24.3.2025 | $0.051 |
| 23.12.2024 | $0.007 |
| 23.9.2024 | $0.025 |
| 24.6.2024 | $0.020 |
| 18.3.2024 | $0.025 |
| 18.12.2023 | $0.028 |
| 18.9.2023 | $0.023 |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 11 positive, 2 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 15 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 1.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 29.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 27.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 25.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 24.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 22.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 19.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 12.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 10.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 10.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 31.7.2026
SeekingAlpha · 30.7.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF (FITE) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for FITE specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
FITE's technical score is 79/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 1.8% of price; Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: CMF 20 days: -0.14; Volume is falling despite the price advance — possible weakening.
Yes — FITE has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 0 filings.
No recent insider transaction filings found for this stock.
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
4,119 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 1,601 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
50.9% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 46.7% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology