Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Industrials · ·
$120.13
▼ $2.24 (-1.8%)
Market data updated: 09/21 01:37 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/21/2026
Market Cap
$17.96B
Day Range
$120.01 - $123.90
52-Week Range
$120.01 - $200.00
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
Support
$120.01
Resistance
$159.04
FDXF is a stock from the Industrials sector — Manufacturing, aerospace, defense, and infrastructure — closely tied to capital-investment cycles and economic growth.
-20.4% (1Y)
Strengths: 5/26 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Leverage risk
Debt/equity: -8.58
Risk
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is eroding over time
Quality
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 0 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 0
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
43
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
32
Quality
47
Value
50
Momentum
18
Risk
54
Sentiment
86
Fundamental
53
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
SCANNING FDXF...
Recent media coverage of FedEx Freight has centered on its recent spinoff from FedEx Corp., with analysts like JPMorgan initiating coverage at an overweight rating and a $160 price target. The company has also faced internal turmoil, including the termination of Chief Commercial Officer Michael Lyons over a code of conduct violation, prompting a redistribution of his responsibilities among other executives. Market sentiment remains cautiously optimistic despite recent underperformance.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about FedEx Freight. News trend score: 86. Reason: 8 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
28
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
37
Psychology
98
Fundamentals
53
Technical
18
Valuation
50
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
-26%
Market Narrative
52
Fundamental Reality
37
Narrative Gap
+15
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s dominant **Loss Aversion** reflects a defensive posture, with traders clinging to positions despite a prolonged drawdown. The narrative gap (+6) and stagnant fundamentals (0% revenue growth) may reinforce selective confirmation bias, while anchoring near support (4.5%) suggests hesitation to exit. Key uncertainty remains: whether the stock’s underperformance relative to peers (-0.3% vs -1.3%) will deepen herding behavior or prompt a shift in risk tolerance. The absence of panic or euphoria underscores a cautious, loss-mitigation mindset—yet the open question is whether volume will spike if support breaks.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 10:07 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"FedEx Freight says executive terminated over code of conduct violation"
"Wall Street analysts remain moderately optimistic about the stock’s prospects"
"FedEx has shifted away from consumer parcel delivery to target higher-margin, business-to-business segments"
"JPMorgan Initiates FedEx Freight at Overweight With $160 Price Target"
📈 10D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 98/100
🔴 Weakest match
Philip Fisher — 12/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock’s starkly divided verdicts reflect deep methodological disagreements about risk, timing, and valuation. The most bullish approaches—like Mackay’s absence of crowd mania and Nelson’s favorable cycle positioning—suggest it’s a low-risk, cyclically opportune play, while Marks’ variants lean cautiously optimistic, viewing risk as reasonably priced without extreme overextension. In contrast, the value-oriented Graham and enterprising variants dismiss it outright, arguing it fails defensive and statistical cheapness thresholds, while Fisher and Veblen reject it as lacking growth quality or signaling speculative excess. Meanwhile, trend-followers like Livermore and Lynch see it as either counter-trend or lacking growth justification, while passive advocates (Malkiel/Bogle) would simply bypass it for a low-cost index. The divide underscores whether the stock’s appeal lies in macro timing, defensive stability, or speculative momentum—or if it’s fundamentally unsuited to any of these frameworks.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 98
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 71
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 70
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 66
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 62
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 50
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 48
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 45
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 38
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 37
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 36
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 36
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 40%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 26
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 22
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 21
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 12
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 80 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 9 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
6.1%
Net Margin
7.4%
EBITDA Margin
12.0%
ROE
-131.8%
ROA
9.5%
ROIC
—
EPS
$4.38
Cash
—
Total Debt
$4.26B
Current Ratio
1.52
Debt/Equity
-8.58
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
-$3.32
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$7.35
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 8 positive, 10 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
ChartMill · 15.9.2026
FreightWaves · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
MT Newswires · 14.9.2026
Business Wire · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 12.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 12.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Barrons.com · 11.9.2026
Barrons.com · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Fintel · 10.9.2026
MT Newswires · 10.9.2026
FedEx Freight (FDXF) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 43/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
FDXF currently scores 43/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
FDXF's technical score is 18/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Debt/equity: -8.58; Current ratio: 1.52; Debt/equity: -8.58.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is eroding over time; ATR: 4.6% of price; Return on equity (ROE): -131.8% (negative).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for FDXF.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Witt Marshall | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.8.2026 | 20,723 | +20,723 | — |
| Witt Marshall | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.8.2026 | 25,333 | +20,723 | — |
| Smith John Alan | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.6.2026 | 7,515 | +7,515 | — |
| King Robert A | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.6.2026 | 1,169 | +1,169 | — |
| Davis Jeffrey A. | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.6.2026 | 1,169 | +1,169 | — |
| MARTIN R BRAD | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.6.2026 | 3,340 | +3,340 | — |
| Lyons Michael B | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.6.2026 | 1,670 | +1,670 | — |
| Rodgers Michael | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.6.2026 | 1,837 | +1,837 | — |
| GORMAN STEPHEN E | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.6.2026 | 1,169 | +1,169 | — |
| Frieson Donald | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.6.2026 | 1,169 | +1,169 | — |
| Rodgers Michael | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.6.2026 | 3,340 | +3,340 | — |
| Smith John Alan | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.6.2026 | 6,680 | +6,680 | — |
| McCoy Clinton D | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.6.2026 | 1,670 | +1,670 | — |
| Lyons Michael B | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.6.2026 | 1,670 | +1,670 | — |
| Witt Marshall | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.6.2026 | 1,670 | +1,670 | — |
| McCoy Clinton D | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.6.2026 | 1,837 | +1,837 | — |
| Erwin Guy M II | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.6.2026 | 801 | +801 | — |
| Witt Marshall | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.6.2026 | 1,954 | +1,954 | — |
| Erwin Guy M II | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.6.2026 | 6,012 | +6,012 | — |
| Sauerland John P | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.6.2026 | 734 | +734 | — |
| Sauerland John P | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.6.2026 | 1,169 | +1,169 | — |
| Klank Clement E III | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.6.2026 | 1,837 | +1,837 | — |
| Klank Clement E III | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.6.2026 | 1,670 | +1,670 | — |
| GORMAN STEPHEN E | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.6.2026 | 3,819 | +1,169 | — |
| MARTIN R BRAD | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.6.2026 | 30,913 | +3,340 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
3,698,681 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 4,192,076 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
57.5% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 63.1% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology