Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· ·
$28.25
▼ $0.41 (-1.4%)
Market data updated: 09/17 11:40 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/17/2026
News analyzed: 09/17/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$27.76 - $28.66
52-Week Range
$24.74 - $46.28
Beta
—
Next Earnings
09.11.2026
-35.0% (1Y)
Strengths: 10/30 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $61.46 vs. price $28.25 (+117.6%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Death Cross
SMA 50 recently crossed below SMA 200
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
45
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
62
Quality
55
Value
67
Momentum
5
Risk
46
Sentiment
50
Fundamental
57
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **eToro Group Ltd.** has centered on analyst reactions and insider activity. A director sold **$3.12 million** in shares, while **KeyBanc** initiated coverage with an **Overweight rating and $45 price target**, contrasting Goldman Sachs’ **Neutral rating and lowered $32 target**. The broader crypto market’s potential rally also influenced eToro’s positioning, though no company-specific developments beyond these analyst moves and insider sales were highlighted.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about eToro Group Ltd. - Class A Common. News trend score: 50. Reason: The mix of positive and negative articles is balanced — 5 vs. 5 out of the last 20 articles.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
18
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
52
Psychology
69
Fundamentals
57
Technical
5
Valuation
67
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
-28%
Market Narrative
21
Fundamental Reality
52
Narrative Gap
-31
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
ETOR’s dominant **Loss Aversion** (64) reflects a market reluctant to accept deeper declines after a 15.6% drop, despite muted volume (0.50x average). The **Overconfidence** (10) signal—price momentum exceeding stagnant EPS growth—suggests some investors may be clinging to gains, but the **narrative gap** (-14) hints at a disconnect between market sentiment (38) and fundamentals (52). The key question is whether traders will hold or exit, given the stock’s significant undervaluation (-50% vs. DCF). Low panic (4) and herding (0) imply no panic-driven selling or herd mentality is driving behavior.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 04:58 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Goldman Sachs analyst lowers price target from $36 to $32 (article 8) and Canaccord Genuity lowers target from $65 to $53 (article 11)"
"Mizuho analyst highlights crypto rally signs and names eToro as a beneficiary (articles 6, 7)"
"Director Shalev Eddy sold $3.12M in stock (articles 1, 5)"
"eToro’s acquisition of TradeZero signals ambition beyond trading (article 12)"
📈 12D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 11/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock’s starkly divided verdicts reflect deep methodological disagreements rooted in risk tolerance, market timing, and valuation thresholds. The highest-scoring investors—Bagehot, Mackay, and Howard Marks (Market Cycle)—prioritize resilience, absence of speculative bubbles, and alignment with early-to-mid cycle conditions, all of which suggest stability and defensive appeal. Meanwhile, the lower-scoring camp—led by Lynch, Fisher, and Livermore—focuses on growth momentum, quality, or trend-following, finding little to justify aggressive bets or contrarian plays. Even Graham’s two approaches split: his *Defensive* investor sees value, while his *Enterprising* bar is unmet, illustrating how nuanced valuation frameworks can clash. The middle ground (Housel, Smith, Loeb) acknowledges holdability but lacks conviction, highlighting a stock that’s seen as *okay* rather than compelling.
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 100
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 100
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 100
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 97
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 92
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 84
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 63
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 60
Some discount, but not the deep 'net-net' bargain Graham's enterprising bar sets
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 58
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 54
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 53
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 41
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 37
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 34
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 15
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 11
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 279 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 11 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
6.5%
Operating Margin
1.9%
Net Margin
1.6%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
15.5%
ROA
12.0%
ROIC
—
EPS
$2.58
Cash
$1.07B
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
4.89
Debt/Equity
0.04
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$28.25
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$61.46
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+117.6%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
10.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.0% | $344.74M | $316.28M |
| 2 | 8.1% | $372.75M | $313.74M |
| 3 | 6.3% | $396.05M | $305.82M |
| 4 | 4.4% | $413.38M | $292.85M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $423.71M | $275.38M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$313.40M
Terminal Value
$6.68B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$4.34B
Enterprise Value
$5.85B
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$5.85B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$17.16
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$16.86
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 5 positive, 10 neutral, 5 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
The Wall Street Journal · 11.9.2026
The Wall Street Journal · 10.9.2026
The Wall Street Journal · 10.9.2026
Benzinga · 9.9.2026
Benzinga · 1.9.2026
MT Newswires · 1.9.2026
Benzinga · 1.9.2026
Benzinga · 1.9.2026
MT Newswires · 31.8.2026
Yahoo · 25.8.2026
Investing.com · 25.8.2026
Benzinga · 25.8.2026
Yahoo · 21.8.2026
CryptoProwl · 21.8.2026
Benzinga · 20.8.2026
Yahoo · 19.8.2026
Insider Monkey · 19.8.2026
Yahoo · 18.8.2026
eToro Group Ltd. - Class A Common (ETOR) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 45/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
ETOR currently scores 45/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, ETOR's estimated fair value is $61.46, which is 117.6% above the current price of $28.25. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
ETOR's technical score is 5/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $61.46 vs. price $28.25 (+117.6%); Debt/equity: 0.04; Current ratio: 4.89.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: SMA 50 recently crossed below SMA 200; ATR: 4.4% of price; Calmar: -0.54 (3y annualized return -36.5% / max drawdown 67.4%).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for ETOR.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 6 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stepak Avner | Conversion of Derivative Security | 6.9.2026 | 33,848 | -33,848 | — |
| Stepak Avner | Conversion of Derivative Security | 6.9.2026 | 33,848 | +33,848 | — |
| Eddy Shalev | Open Market Sale | 28.8.2026 | 197,679 | -99,100 | $31.19 |
| Eddy Shalev | Open Market Sale | 28.8.2026 | 196,779 | -900 | $31.92 |
| Eddy Shalev | Open Market Sale | 28.8.2026 | 99,100 | -99,100 | $31.19 |
| Eddy Shalev | Open Market Sale | 28.8.2026 | 900 | -900 | $31.92 |
| POLITI SANTO | Other Transaction | 12.8.2026 | 5,783 | +5,783 | — |
| POLITI SANTO | Disposition to the Company | 12.8.2026 | 3,559,007 | -3,559,007 | — |
| POLITI SANTO | Disposition to the Company | 12.8.2026 | 23,280 | -23,280 | — |
| POLITI SANTO | Open Market Sale | 12.8.2026 | 5,783 | -5,783 | $28.01 |
| UNGER LAURA S | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2026 | 5,220 | +5,220 | — |
| Shemesh Lior | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2026 | 5,220 | +5,220 | — |
| UNGER LAURA S | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2026 | 9,890 | +5,220 | — |
| Shemesh Lior | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2026 | 9,890 | +5,220 | — |
| Ber Hedva | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.6.2026 | 22,500 | -22,500 | — |
| Ber Hedva | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.6.2026 | 6,000 | +6,000 | $15.00 |
| Ber Hedva | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.6.2026 | 20,660 | +20,660 | $17.50 |
| Ber Hedva | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.6.2026 | 6,000 | -6,000 | — |
| Ber Hedva | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.6.2026 | 6,000 | -6,000 | — |
| Ber Hedva | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.6.2026 | 22,500 | +22,500 | $17.50 |
| Ber Hedva | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.6.2026 | 20,660 | -20,660 | — |
| Ber Hedva | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.6.2026 | 6,000 | +6,000 | $15.00 |
| Ber Hedva | Open Market Sale | 1.6.2026 | 55,160 | -55,160 | $41.90 |
| Ber Hedva | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.6.2026 | 20,660 | +20,660 | $17.50 |
| Ber Hedva | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.6.2026 | 26,660 | +6,000 | $15.00 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
2,656,772 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 2,894,870 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
70.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 61.6% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology