Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$5.36
▼ $0.08 (-1.5%)
Market data updated: 09/19 10:29 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/18/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$140.28M
Day Range
$5.27 - $5.42
52-Week Range
$5.02 - $15.95
Beta
—
Next Earnings
10.11.2026
Support
$5.02
Resistance
$7.60
EGAN is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
-40.3% (1Y)
Strengths: 6/28 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $10.38 vs. price $5.36 (+93.7%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is eroding over time
Quality
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
48
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
4d ago · $5.26
Evidence: Narrative Gap moved from 29 to 4 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
12d ago · $5.84
Evidence: Panic-selling score jumped from 1 to 73 day-over-day
What happened after
13d ago · $5.84
Evidence: Panic-selling score jumped from 1 to 73 day-over-day
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
48
Quality
42
Value
62
Momentum
12
Risk
40
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
63
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **eGain Corporation** has centered on its **declining stock performance**, driven by **weaker-than-expected Q4 earnings and revenue**, which caused its shares to drop. Analysts, including **Roth Capital and B. Riley Securities**, downgraded the stock to **Neutral** and slashed price targets from **$21 to $7** and **$10.5 to $6**, respectively, citing market caution. Despite eGain’s **AI-driven growth plans for 2030**, the selloff reflects broader **economic uncertainty** and investor skepticism about its financial trajectory.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about eGain Corporation. News trend score: 100. Reason: 14 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
38
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
36
Psychology
69
Fundamentals
63
Technical
12
Valuation
62
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
-28%
Market Narrative
40
Fundamental Reality
36
Narrative Gap
+4
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior here is dominated by **Panic Selling**, evidenced by extreme volume, oversold conditions, and extreme sentiment despite a stagnant narrative. The narrative-reality gap (+30) suggests investors remain anchored to outdated expectations, while the 2.1% proximity to support hints at a potential near-term floor. The divergence between momentum and fundamentals (e.g., -25.8% price vs. +3.5% EPS growth) may reflect overconfidence in a fading thesis. The key open question: *Will the extreme volume and volatility sustain, or will buyers emerge at support?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 04:55 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Roth Capital downgrades eGain to Neutral and lowers price target from $21 to $7."
"eGain Shares Drop After Fiscal Q4 Adjusted Earnings, Revenue Fall"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 10D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 95/100
🔴 Weakest match
Peter Lynch — 12/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on their documented principles, the model estimates that cycle‑focused investors such as Nelson (score 99) and Howard Marks’ market‑cycle view (score 80) see the stock in a favorable position, while growth‑oriented thinkers like Fisher (score 41) and Lynch (score 12) find it lacking the quality or price‑growth balance they require. Value‑oriented analysts such as Benjamin Graham’s defensive approach (score 71) and Jack Schwager’s disciplined risk/reward framework (score 85) still rate it positively, reflecting their emphasis on margin of safety rather than high growth. In contrast, risk‑averse models like Loeb (score 31) and Jesse Livermore (score 26) flag the stock as a capital threat due to perceived risk and negative trend. The efficient‑market perspective (score 35) and Graham’s enterprising view (score 44) are lukewarm, indicating mixed evidence for outperformance. Overall, the divergence stems from each methodology’s weighting of cycle timing, safety, liquidity, and growth quality.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 95
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 80
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 80
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 75
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 70
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 63
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 57
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 45
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 43
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 41
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 36
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 31
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 22
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 22
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 18
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 12
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 10 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
73.4%
Operating Margin
8.7%
Net Margin
9.7%
EBITDA Margin
8.7%
ROE
10.5%
ROA
6.0%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.33
Cash
$73.34M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
1.73
Debt/Equity
—
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$5.36
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$10.38
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+93.7%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-2.3%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -2.3% | $20.06M | $18.40M |
| 2 | -1.1% | $19.83M | $16.69M |
| 3 | 0.1% | $19.85M | $15.33M |
| 4 | 1.3% | $20.11M | $14.24M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $20.61M | $13.39M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$20.53M
Terminal Value
$325.00M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$211.23M
Enterprise Value
$289.29M
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$289.29M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$3.02
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$2.55
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 14 positive, 4 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Insider Monkey · 12.9.2026
Yahoo · 12.9.2026
ChartMill · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Motley Fool · 9.9.2026
Benzinga · 8.9.2026
Benzinga · 8.9.2026
Benzinga · 8.9.2026
Benzinga · 8.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 8.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 7.9.2026
MT Newswires · 4.9.2026
ChartMill · 4.9.2026
ChartMill · 4.9.2026
Benzinga · 4.9.2026
Benzinga · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Moby · 4.9.2026
ChartMill · 4.9.2026
MT Newswires · 4.9.2026
eGain Corporation (EGAN) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 48/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
EGAN currently scores 48/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, EGAN's estimated fair value is $10.38, which is 93.7% above the current price of $5.36. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
EGAN's technical score is 12/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $10.38 vs. price $5.36 (+93.7%); Free cash flow growth: 337.1%; Current ratio: 1.73.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is eroding over time; ATR: 5.8% of price; Calmar: -0.07 (3y annualized return -4.7% / max drawdown 66.9%).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for EGAN.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 9 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMIT ERIC | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 2.2.2026 | 5,000 | -5,000 | — |
| SMIT ERIC | Open Market Sale | 2.2.2026 | 5,000 | -5,000 | $10.25 |
| SMIT ERIC | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 2.2.2026 | 5,000 | +5,000 | $2.50 |
| SMIT ERIC | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 2.2.2026 | 134,187 | +5,000 | $2.50 |
| SMIT ERIC | Open Market Sale | 2.2.2026 | 129,187 | -5,000 | $10.25 |
| SMIT ERIC | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 2.2.2026 | 23,000 | -5,000 | — |
| SMIT ERIC | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 2.1.2026 | 5,000 | +5,000 | $2.50 |
| SMIT ERIC | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 2.1.2026 | 5,000 | -5,000 | — |
| SMIT ERIC | Open Market Sale | 2.1.2026 | 5,000 | -5,000 | $10.24 |
| SMIT ERIC | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 2.1.2026 | 134,187 | +5,000 | $2.50 |
| SMIT ERIC | Open Market Sale | 2.1.2026 | 129,187 | -5,000 | $10.24 |
| SMIT ERIC | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 2.1.2026 | 28,000 | -5,000 | — |
| Darukhanavala Phiroz P | Open Market Sale | 4.12.2025 | 10,000 | -10,000 | $10.61 |
| Darukhanavala Phiroz P | Open Market Sale | 4.12.2025 | 500 | -500 | $10.73 |
| Darukhanavala Phiroz P | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.12.2025 | 10,000 | +10,000 | — |
| Darukhanavala Phiroz P | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.12.2025 | 10,000 | +10,000 | $2.50 |
| Darukhanavala Phiroz P | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.12.2025 | 12,500 | +10,000 | $2.50 |
| Darukhanavala Phiroz P | Open Market Sale | 4.12.2025 | 2,500 | -10,000 | $10.61 |
| Darukhanavala Phiroz P | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.12.2025 | 60,000 | +10,000 | — |
| SMIT ERIC | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.12.2025 | 5,000 | -5,000 | — |
| SMIT ERIC | Open Market Sale | 1.12.2025 | 5,000 | -5,000 | $10.07 |
| SMIT ERIC | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.12.2025 | 5,000 | +5,000 | $2.50 |
| SMIT ERIC | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.12.2025 | 134,187 | +5,000 | $2.50 |
| SMIT ERIC | Open Market Sale | 1.12.2025 | 129,187 | -5,000 | $10.07 |
| SMIT ERIC | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.12.2025 | 33,000 | -5,000 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,528,847 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 1,501,138 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
46.5% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 55.0% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology