Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Utilities · ·
$33.57
▼ $0.35 (-1.0%)
Market data updated: 09/25 01:01 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/25/2026
News analyzed: 09/25/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$33.18 - $33.77
52-Week Range
$24.63 - $43.18
Beta
—
Next Earnings
05.11.2026
Support
$33.28
Resistance
$40.78
EE is a stock from the Utilities sector — Electricity, water, and residential gas — steady demand and heavy regulation, considered a defensive, dividend-paying sector.
+41.0% (1Y)
Strengths: 8/24 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 44.3%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is eroding over time
Quality
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
49
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
1d ago · $34.46
Evidence: Panic-selling score jumped from 11 to 46 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
60
Quality
47
Value
55
Momentum
9
Risk
54
Sentiment
98
Fundamental
63
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Excelerate Energy, Inc. has centered on its strong financial momentum and strategic positioning in the liquefied natural gas (LNG) sector. The company has been praised for its accelerating revenue growth, high relative strength, and a shift toward long-term, take-or-pay contracts—now covering over 90% of its adjusted EBITDA—enhancing resilience amid geopolitical energy disruptions. Additionally, Excelerate highlighted its 2025 Sustainability Report, emphasizing energy security and responsible growth, while CEO Steven Kobos is set to participate in an investor conference to discuss the company’s outlook.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Excelerate Energy, Inc.. News trend score: 98. Reason: 11 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
38
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
38
Psychology
59
Fundamentals
63
Technical
9
Valuation
55
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
-9%
Market Narrative
52
Fundamental Reality
38
Narrative Gap
+14
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for EE suggests a dominant anchoring bias, with traders fixating on the 1.9% gap below resistance. Herding and euphoria coexist but are secondary, likely due to peer outperformance and extreme sentiment. The narrative-reality gap (32) hints at overoptimism, while overconfidence in momentum over fundamentals may amplify anchoring. The key question: will traders break free from resistance or double down on the anchor?
Updated: 09/07/2026, 05:28 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"more than 90% of its adjusted EBITDA is now backed by long-term, take-or-pay contracts"
"strong uptrend, high relative strength, and accelerating revenue growth"
"strengthen energy security... amid ongoing geopolitical uncertainty in global energy markets"
"stock is not an obvious bargain at current levels... fully priced despite raised EBITDA guidance"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 9D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 99/100
🔴 Weakest match
Thorstein Veblen — 24/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among methodologies, with some models seeing strong fundamentals or momentum while others flag overvaluation or late-cycle risks. The highest-scoring approaches—Walter Bagehot’s liquidity focus and Edgar Lawrence Smith’s 'buy-and-hold' philosophy—both suggest resilience and long-term potential, emphasizing stability and endurance. Meanwhile, Jesse Livermore’s trend-following model also leans positive, aligning with the stock’s price action, though less enthusiastically than the others. In contrast, more conservative or growth-focused investors like Peter Lynch and Thorstein Veblen dismiss it outright, with Lynch citing insufficient growth value and Veblen warning of speculative excess. The middle ground is occupied by Graham’s mixed verdicts (both traditional and enterprising), Fisher’s lukewarm quality assessment, and Marks’ caution about inflated expectations, hinting at a stock that may be attractive but not without risk. The stark contrast between the top-tier liquidity/hold strategies and the late-cycle or speculative warnings underscores how the same stock can be interpreted as either a defensive anchor or a speculative bubble, depending on the framework.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 99
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 84
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 83
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 80
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 75
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 69
Some discount, but not the deep 'net-net' bargain Graham's enterprising bar sets
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 63
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 63
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 40%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 57
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 57
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 52
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 45
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 35
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 29
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 25
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 24
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 284 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 11 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
21.7%
Net Margin
—
EBITDA Margin
30.8%
ROE
—
ROA
—
ROIC
—
EPS
$1.31
Cash
$538.23M
Total Debt
$936.31M
Current Ratio
2.43
Debt/Equity
0.42
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 19.8.2026 | $0.090 |
| 20.5.2026 | $0.080 |
| 19.5.2026 | $0.080 |
| 11.3.2026 | $0.080 |
| 10.3.2026 | $0.080 |
| 19.11.2025 | $0.080 |
| 18.11.2025 | $0.080 |
| 20.8.2025 | $0.080 |
| 19.8.2025 | $0.080 |
| 21.5.2025 | $0.060 |
| 20.5.2025 | $0.060 |
| 12.3.2025 | $0.060 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$72.79
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$53.39
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 11 positive, 6 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 10.9.2026
ChartMill · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Business Wire · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 27.8.2026
Business Wire · 27.8.2026
Benzinga · 26.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 26.8.2026
Yahoo · 24.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 24.8.2026
Yahoo · 23.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 23.8.2026
Yahoo · 23.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 23.8.2026
MarketBeat · 20.8.2026
MarketBeat · 18.8.2026
StockStory · 14.8.2026
StockStory · 14.8.2026
Motley Fool · 12.8.2026
Excelerate Energy, Inc. (EE) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 49/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
EE currently scores 49/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
EE's technical score is 9/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 44.3%; Debt/equity: 0.42; Current ratio: 2.43.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is eroding over time; ATR: 4.6% of price; Price is below the 50-day average.
Yes — EE has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 3 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Newman Hood Alisa | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.3.2026 | 1,256 | -1,256 | $33.31 |
| Broussard Amy Thompson | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.3.2026 | 699 | -699 | $33.31 |
| Armstrong Dana A | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.3.2026 | 1,972 | -1,972 | $33.31 |
| Simpson Oliver | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.3.2026 | 546 | -546 | $33.31 |
| Bent Michael Anthony | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.3.2026 | 576 | -576 | $33.31 |
| Broussard Amy Thompson | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.3.2026 | 32,152 | -699 | $33.31 |
| Armstrong Dana A | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.3.2026 | 75,545 | -1,972 | $33.31 |
| Bent Michael Anthony | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.3.2026 | 31,332 | -576 | $33.31 |
| Newman Hood Alisa | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.3.2026 | 39,096 | -1,256 | $33.31 |
| Simpson Oliver | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.3.2026 | 51,173 | -546 | $33.31 |
| Simpson Oliver | Open Market Sale | 20.3.2026 | 6,000 | -6,000 | $34.15 |
| Simpson Oliver | Open Market Sale | 20.3.2026 | 51,719 | -6,000 | $34.15 |
| Simpson Oliver | Open Market Sale | 20.3.2026 | 51,719 | -6,000 | $34.15 |
| Bent Michael Anthony | Tax Withholding in Shares | 5.3.2026 | 1,782 | -1,782 | $38.48 |
| Newman Hood Alisa | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.3.2026 | 10,850 | +10,850 | — |
| Kobos Steven M | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.3.2026 | 51,976 | +51,976 | — |
| Broussard Amy Thompson | Tax Withholding in Shares | 5.3.2026 | 1,791 | -1,791 | $38.48 |
| Simpson Oliver | Tax Withholding in Shares | 5.3.2026 | 4,657 | -4,657 | $38.48 |
| Broussard Amy Thompson | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.3.2026 | 7,277 | +7,277 | — |
| Simpson Oliver | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.3.2026 | 15,073 | +15,073 | — |
| Newman Hood Alisa | Tax Withholding in Shares | 5.3.2026 | 3,469 | -3,469 | $38.48 |
| Armstrong Dana A | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.3.2026 | 16,710 | +16,710 | — |
| Armstrong Dana A | Tax Withholding in Shares | 5.3.2026 | 5,408 | -5,408 | $38.48 |
| Bent Michael Anthony | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.3.2026 | 5,783 | +5,783 | — |
| Liner David A. | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.3.2026 | 15,593 | +15,593 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
2,406,840 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 2,303,583 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
31.9% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 40.9% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology