Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· · NASDAQ
$158.24
▼ $1.44 (-0.9%)
Market data updated: 09/18 11:15 PM
News analyzed: 09/18/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$157.95 - $159.31
52-Week Range
$137.16 - $167.06
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
Support
$157.62
Resistance
$167.06
+12.8% (1Y)
🟡 Moderate
Strengths: 3/13 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 1.0% of price
Risk
Biggest negative driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is below the 50-day average
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
DVY’s overall **investor score of 72** reflects a balanced profile driven by strong fundamental and news-driven momentum, tempered by mixed technical signals and moderate risk metrics. The **news category (98)** is the clear standout, with recent articles highlighting its role in value and dividend strategies, reinforcing its appeal as a defensive, income-generating asset. However, **technical indicators (64)** reveal a contradiction: while the stock remains above key moving averages (50-day and 200-day) and exhibits healthy RSI momentum (54.2), the negative MACD histogram and price below the SAR point suggest underlying downside pressure. The **risk score (58)** is further constrained by a low ATR (1.0%) and a Calmar ratio of 0.78, indicating modest volatility but a history of significant drawdowns (17.5%) relative to its returns (13.6% annualized). These factors create a nuanced outlook where positive narrative and intermediate-term strength are offset by technical fragility and structural risk.
The stock sits above both the 50-day and 200-day moving averages with an RSI of 54.2, signaling positive momentum, but the MACD histogram is negative and the price is below the SAR point, indicating potential downtrend pressure.
This duality suggests intermediate-term strength may be fading, requiring vigilance for a potential reversal or continuation of the downtrend.
Recent articles overwhelmingly frame DVY as a resilient dividend and value play, with four out of five pieces carrying positive or neutral tones, reinforcing its defensive positioning in market narratives.
Positive news sentiment can drive investor confidence and sustained demand, particularly in uncertain market conditions.
The ATR of 1.0% indicates low volatility, but the Calmar ratio of 0.78—combined with a 17.5% historical drawdown—highlights a risk-reward tradeoff where returns are achieved at the cost of significant drawdowns.
This ratio underscores the need for risk management, as the stock’s returns may not be sustainable without periodic corrections.
StockIQ conclusion
DVY presents a mixed profile where strong news-driven fundamentals and intermediate-term price support are partially offset by technical weakness and structural risk. The stock’s resilience as a dividend play is evident, but its vulnerability to downside pressure—highlighted by the MACD and SAR signals—requires careful monitoring. Investors may find value in its defensive attributes, but the risk of drawdowns and potential momentum shifts must be managed.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
53
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
33
Risk
58
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage on the **iShares Select Dividend ETF** is limited, as headlines focus broadly on dividend stocks, market trends, and ETF strategies rather than the fund itself. Themes include the underperformance of high-yield dividend stocks relative to tax benefits (e.g., government payouts), the resurgence of value and small-cap stocks, and opportunities in deep-value and high-dividend equities amid shifting interest rates. Some articles mention dividend ETFs as alternatives to Social Security adjustments, but no direct updates on the iShares Select Dividend ETF’s performance or holdings are provided.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about iShares Select Dividend ETF. News trend score: 100. Reason: 13 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
18
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
90
Fundamentals
—
Technical
33
Valuation
—
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
+3%
Market Narrative
61
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+11
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for DVY suggests traders are fixated on the 2.0% resistance gap, anchoring decisions around this level despite mixed technicals. The extreme positive sentiment (98/100) and modest outperformance (+6.8% above 200-day avg) hint at euphoria, but weak momentum (-0.4% ROC) and neutral RSI (52) temper overconfidence. The key open question is whether traders will break resistance or retreat, given the narrative-reality gap (13 points) may signal mispricing. Anchoring dominates, but euphoria’s presence suggests caution if momentum fails to improve.
Updated: 09/08/2026, 04:12 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Three dividend ETFs can fill that gap on your own terms"
"DVY’s 3.3% yield looks weak against 4.55% Treasury rates"
"In this paper, we examine why the current environment may present a compelling opportunity to increase allocations to ... high-dividend-yield equities"
"The dividend cut creates a buying opportunity"
📈 10D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Morgan Housel — 99/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 40/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark contrast in verdicts for DVY reflects deep philosophical and methodological divides among these investors. Morgan Housel’s near-perfect score highlights his focus on patient, long-term compounding—where steady dividends and stability align perfectly with his principles. Meanwhile, Gerald Loeb and Samuel Nelson’s moderate scores suggest a cautious but constructive view, favoring capital preservation and cyclical positioning, respectively. At the opposite end, Jack Schwager’s low score and Jesse Livermore’s negative verdict underscore a rejection of the stock’s trend or structural setup, prioritizing technical or contrarian discipline over income-driven strategies. Even among those with neutral scores, the lack of definitive data (e.g., Graham, Fisher, Lynch) reveals how DVY’s dividend-heavy profile may not satisfy rigorous fundamental or valuation scrutiny, while Howard Marks’ mixed but cautious stance hints at potential overvaluation or inflated expectations.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 99
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 97
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 74
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 70
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 55
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 51
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 50
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 48
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 40
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 277 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (2 bullish · 8 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a trading range, but the picture isn't yet clear enough on the likely direction.
Low confidence
$157.62
Range Bottom
$167.06
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 15.6.2026 | $1.247 |
| 17.3.2026 | $1.149 |
| 16.12.2025 | $1.616 |
| 16.9.2025 | $1.246 |
| 16.6.2025 | $1.233 |
| 18.3.2025 | $1.049 |
| 17.12.2024 | $1.316 |
| 25.9.2024 | $1.550 |
| 11.6.2024 | $0.930 |
| 21.3.2024 | $0.998 |
| 20.12.2023 | $1.189 |
| 26.9.2023 | $1.465 |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 13 positive, 5 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
Zacks · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 3.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 19.8.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 18.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 17.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 12.8.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 11.8.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 7.8.2026
Yahoo · 7.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 6.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 5.8.2026
Trefis · 28.7.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 22.7.2026
Zacks · 13.7.2026
Zacks · 10.7.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for iShares Select Dividend ETF (DVY) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for DVY specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
DVY's technical score is 33/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 1.0% of price; Price is above the 200-day average; +1.4% over the last 3 months relative to the index.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is below the 50-day average; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum; Price is below the SAR point — downtrend.
Yes — DVY has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 0 filings.
No recent insider transaction filings found for this stock.
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
892,050 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 899,195 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
52.9% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 60.6% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology