Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$9.14
▼ $0.41 (-4.3%)
Market data updated: 09/26 01:55 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/26/2026
News analyzed: 09/26/2026
Market Cap
$287.66M
Day Range
$9.02 - $9.71
52-Week Range
$6.17 - $15.28
Beta
—
Next Earnings
10.11.2026
Support
$7.46
Resistance
$12.83
DUOT is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
+18.2% (1Y)
Strengths: 11/29 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟡 Mixed
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 271.2%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$62.53 vs. price $9.14 (-784.2%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (62/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (38/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
54
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
23d ago · $8.53
Evidence: Panic-selling score jumped from 7 to 33 day-over-day
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
62
Quality
58
Value
38
Momentum
59
Risk
40
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
32
Institutional
100
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Duos Technologies Group, Inc. (Nasdaq: DUOT) has focused on strategic leadership changes and expansion in its Edge Data Center (EDC) solutions. The company announced the appointments of Christopher DeAlmeida as CFO and Dipan Patel as COO, signaling operational and financial scaling ahead of its Edge AI platform rollout. Additionally, Duos Edge AI’s partnership with DDC Solutions for cooling high-density GPU infrastructure at its Columbus, Georgia campus highlights its growth in AI-driven data center infrastructure. Analysts also note Duos’ strong Q2 earnings and potential for explosive growth in AI data centers.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Duos Technologies Group, Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 13 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
21
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
72
Fundamentals
32
Technical
59
Valuation
38
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
-20%
Market Narrative
69
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+19
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
DUOT’s psychology is dominated by loss aversion, consistent with a prolonged drawdown (-25.5% in three months) where investors cling to positions despite weak momentum and subdued volume. The near-zero FOMO and herding scores suggest no urgency to buy or follow peers, while euphoria is effectively neutralized by technical weakness. The narrow narrative gap (3 points) implies no major disconnect between market perception and fundamentals, but the key question remains: *Will the recent outperformance vs. peers (+3.1%) sustain, or will loss aversion persist as the stock tests support?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 12:45 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Duos continues the rapid rollout of its Edge AI platform to meet strong customer demand"
"Duos Technologies Group, Inc. announced the appointment of Dipan Patel as Chief Operating Officer"
"cool and protect high-density GPU infrastructure at Duos Edge AI's Columbus, Georgia data center campus"
"Duos Technologies Stock Jumps on Q2 Earnings Beat"
📈 6D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 93/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among methodologies, with Peter Lynch and Samuel Armstrong Nelson both assigning it high scores (93 and 88, respectively), framing it as a growth opportunity or cyclically oversold play. Lynch’s enthusiasm stems from what he sees as undervalued growth potential, while Nelson’s technical tilt highlights a favorable short-term position. In contrast, the majority of investors—including Graham, Loeb, and Livermore—reach starkly negative conclusions, with scores as low as 0 or 14, flagging risks like overvaluation, poor defensive metrics, or outright trend resistance. Fisher and Marks also temper optimism, questioning whether the stock meets their standards for quality or whether expectations are already inflated. The divergence reflects a tension between growth-focused and value/defensive approaches, with only a handful of methodologies finding any merit in the stock’s current profile.
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 93
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 75
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 67
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 63
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 63
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 48
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 45
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 44
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 41
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 39
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 38
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 37
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 34
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 31
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 28
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 287 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟡 Indicators are mixed — no clear bias (6 bullish · 4 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
29.2%
Operating Margin
-36.1%
Net Margin
-36.4%
EBITDA Margin
-28.3%
ROE
-20.3%
ROA
-15.5%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$0.64
Cash
$15.47M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
2.08
Debt/Equity
—
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$9.14
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$62.53
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-784.2%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
25.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25.0% | $-46.76M | $-42.90M |
| 2 | 19.4% | $-55.82M | $-46.99M |
| 3 | 13.8% | $-63.50M | $-49.03M |
| 4 | 8.1% | $-68.66M | $-48.64M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-70.38M | $-45.74M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-37.41M
Terminal Value
$-1.11B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-721.28M
Enterprise Value
$-954.59M
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$-954.59M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$3.18
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$3.17
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 13 positive, 5 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Benzinga · 24.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
PR Newswire · 1.9.2026
Benzinga · 28.8.2026
Yahoo · 26.8.2026
Stocktwits · 26.8.2026
Benzinga · 26.8.2026
Stocktwits · 20.8.2026
Benzinga · 20.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 19.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 18.8.2026
ChartMill · 18.8.2026
Moby · 18.8.2026
Benzinga · 18.8.2026
Benzinga · 18.8.2026
Benzinga · 18.8.2026
Duos Technologies Group, Inc. (DUOT) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 54/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
DUOT currently scores 54/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, DUOT's estimated fair value is -$62.53, which is 784.2% below the current price of $9.14. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
DUOT's technical score is 59/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 271.2%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 54.0%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$62.53 vs. price $9.14 (-784.2%); Operating margin: -36.1% (negative); Net margin: -36.4% (negative).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for DUOT.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 3 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recker Frank Douglas | Open Market Purchase | 22.9.2026 | 9,250 | +9,250 | $9.14 |
| Nixon James Craig | Open Market Purchase | 18.9.2026 | 81,616 | +2,857 | $8.50 |
| Nixon James Craig | Open Market Purchase | 18.9.2026 | 84,523 | +2,907 | $8.60 |
| Lonegro Frank A | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 2,074 | +2,074 | $12.06 |
| James Brian J. | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 2,074 | +2,074 | $12.06 |
| Goldfarb Adrian Graham | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 1,532 | +1,532 | $9.18 |
| Nixon James Craig | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 1,556 | +1,556 | $12.06 |
| MAVROMMATIS NED | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 1,659 | +1,659 | $12.06 |
| Ferry Charles Parker | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 2,074 | +2,074 | $12.06 |
| MAVROMMATIS NED | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 65,543 | +1,659 | $12.06 |
| Goldfarb Adrian Graham | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 2,247 | +1,532 | $9.18 |
| Lonegro Frank A | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 40,620 | +2,074 | $12.06 |
| Nixon James Craig | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 78,759 | +1,556 | $12.06 |
| James Brian J. | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 8,030 | +2,074 | $12.06 |
| Ferry Charles Parker | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 2,074 | +2,074 | $12.06 |
| Ferry Charles Parker | Other Transaction | 1.4.2026 | 261,444 | -261,444 | — |
| Ferry Charles Parker | Other Transaction | 1.4.2026 | 261,445 | -261,444 | — |
| Nixon James Craig | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.3.2026 | 3,735 | +3,735 | $6.69 |
| James Brian J. | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.3.2026 | 3,735 | +3,735 | $6.69 |
| MAVROMMATIS NED | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.3.2026 | 2,988 | +2,988 | $6.69 |
| Lonegro Frank A | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.3.2026 | 3,735 | +3,735 | $6.69 |
| MAVROMMATIS NED | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.3.2026 | 53,884 | +2,988 | $6.69 |
| Nixon James Craig | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.3.2026 | 77,203 | +3,735 | $6.69 |
| James Brian J. | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.3.2026 | 5,956 | +3,735 | $6.69 |
| Lonegro Frank A | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.3.2026 | 38,546 | +3,735 | $6.69 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
5,692,165 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 5,348,262 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
47.4% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 58.3% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology