Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$4.91
▼ $0.03 (-0.6%)
Market data updated: 09/27 01:43 PM
News analyzed: 09/27/2026
Market Cap
$110.35M
Day Range
$4.88 - $5.22
52-Week Range
$4.07 - $17.47
Beta
—
Next Earnings
28.10.2026
Support
$4.73
Resistance
$8.16
DMRC is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
-49.2% (1Y)
⚠️ Insufficient data for a reliable StockIQ Score
Only 3 of 7 categories available — Fundamental, Growth, Valuation, Quality unavailable.
Strengths: 1/13 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
MACD
MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 9.0% of price
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
74/100
Similarity
8
Historical Matches
73/100
Analog Quality
-9.0%
Median 40D Outcome
0/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
63%
+30.4% … +65.7%
🟡 Base
0%
— … —
🔴 Bearish
38%
-41.8% … -32.0%
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 5 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 8 similar historical cases for this stock, 63% (95% CI 31%–86%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of +22.1%.
Echo #1 — Oversold Reversal
1 occurrence(s) · 0% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 75% (41%–93%) | +17.4% | -0.9% … +23.3% | -0.5% |
| 10D | 63% (31%–86%) | +16.3% | -12.0% … +26.1% | -3.1% |
| 20D | 63% (31%–86%) | +22.1% | -27.3% … +58.7% | +5.6% |
| 40D | 50% (22%–78%) | -9.0% | -29.5% … +74.8% | -16.0% |
| 60D | 38% (14%–69%) | -16.2% | -42.1% … +38.3% | -17.6% |
Sample size: 8 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-05 | 74/100 | High Volatility | +13.8% | +228.6% |
| 2026-04-10 | 63/100 | High Volatility | +65.7% | +25.3% |
| 2026-03-26 | 60/100 | High Volatility | +56.4% | +77.5% |
| 2026-06-30 | 54/100 | High Volatility | -22.5% | -39.9% |
| 2026-04-27 | 47/100 | High Volatility | +80.0% | -17.6% |
| 2026-05-11 | 45/100 | High Volatility | +30.4% | -14.7% |
| 2026-06-15 | 38/100 | High Volatility | -42.0% | -56.1% |
| 2026-05-26 | 21/100 | High Volatility | -41.5% | -48.6% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLK (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
Digimarc (DMRC) exhibits a weak overall investor score of 21, primarily driven by pronounced technical and risk-related weaknesses. The technical category scores poorly (9/100) due to sustained price weakness—currently trading below both the 50-day (10.7% below) and 200-day moving averages (13.5% below)—alongside a negative MACD histogram indicating a declining momentum trend. The RSI (33.1) and %K (7.8) further suggest oversold conditions and bearish sentiment, reinforcing the downtrend. Risk metrics are equally concerning, with a high average true range (ATR) of 10.7% of the stock’s price and a Calmar ratio of -0.52, reflecting a 47% annualized loss over three years and a theoretical maximum drawdown of 90.8%. News sentiment, while less severe, remains negative, with a single critical headline highlighting execution gaps in the company’s turnaround efforts. These factors collectively underscore a challenging technical and risk profile, with news reinforcing operational vulnerabilities.
The stock trades below both the 50-day and 200-day moving averages, with a negative MACD histogram, RSI of 33.1 (oversold), and %K at 7.8, signaling a clear downtrend and bearish momentum.
Technical indicators like moving averages and momentum tools are critical for identifying short-term trends and potential reversal points, and their alignment here suggests sustained weakness.
The sole news item highlights operational execution gaps as a key obstacle to Digimarc’s turnaround strategy, framed as a negative factor.
News sentiment directly impacts investor perception of the company’s ability to address core challenges, particularly in execution-heavy sectors.
The ATR (10.7% of price) indicates high volatility, while the Calmar ratio (-0.52) reflects severe underperformance (47% annualized loss over three years) and an extreme maximum drawdown risk of 90.8%.
Risk metrics like ATR and Calmar ratio quantify volatility and downside exposure, which are critical for assessing long-term sustainability and risk tolerance.
StockIQ conclusion
Digimarc’s weak investor score of 21 reflects a confluence of technical weakness, elevated risk, and negative news sentiment. The stock’s price remains trapped below critical moving averages, momentum indicators confirm a downtrend, and risk metrics underscore extreme volatility and downside potential. While short-term oversold conditions may offer fleeting opportunities, the broader context of operational challenges and historical underperformance suggests caution. Investors should closely monitor operational updates and sector developments, as these could meaningfully alter the stock’s outlook.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
29
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
Not enough data yet to generate this synthesis.
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
22
Risk
34
Sentiment
44
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Everyone's writing about Digimarc Corporation. News trend score: 44. Reason: 1 of the last 2 articles are negative, versus 0 positive.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
15
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
71
Fundamentals
—
Technical
22
Valuation
—
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
-36%
Market Narrative
37
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
-13
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 100
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 100
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 91
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 75
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 70
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 38
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 25
Weak case — Malkiel/Bogle would say a low-cost index is the simpler bet
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 21
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 20
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 15
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 9 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 0 positive, 1 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 2 articles.
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 27.8.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Digimarc Corporation (DMRC) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for DMRC specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
DMRC's technical score is 22/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 9.0% of price; Calmar: -0.51 (3y annualized return -46.7% / max drawdown 90.8%); Price is below the 50-day average.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for DMRC.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 4 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sickles Ken | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.8.2026 | 73,861 | +2,268 | $7.53 |
| Quinn Carle Ann | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.8.2026 | 183,454 | +2,617 | $7.53 |
| Sickles Ken | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.8.2026 | 72,508 | -1,353 | $7.53 |
| Beck Charles | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.8.2026 | 119,712 | -2,982 | $7.53 |
| Rodriguez Tony | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.8.2026 | 99,299 | -2,697 | $7.53 |
| Quinn Carle Ann | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.8.2026 | 177,553 | -5,901 | $7.53 |
| Beck Charles | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.8.2026 | 122,694 | +2,617 | $7.53 |
| Rodriguez Tony | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.8.2026 | 101,996 | +2,268 | $7.53 |
| Thomas Ron | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2026 | 192,000 | +192,000 | — |
| CARREIRO PAUL | Grant/Award from Employer | 6.7.2026 | 1,060,000 | +1,060,000 | — |
| mccormack riley | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.7.2026 | 128,805 | +64,146 | — |
| Dadlani Sandeep | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 57,894 | +1,520 | $8.22 |
| McIlwain Dana | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 37,765 | +988 | $8.22 |
| Anderson-Williams LaShonda | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 41,951 | +988 | $8.22 |
| Park Michael | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 39,433 | +760 | $8.22 |
| mccormack riley | Open Market Sale | 18.6.2026 | 0 | -27,071 | $9.46 |
| mccormack riley | Open Market Sale | 17.6.2026 | 27,071 | -15,003 | $10.05 |
| mccormack riley | Open Market Sale | 16.6.2026 | 0 | -3,512 | $10.96 |
| mccormack riley | Other Transaction | 16.6.2026 | 0 | -2,275,737 | — |
| mccormack riley | Open Market Sale | 16.6.2026 | 42,074 | -69,363 | $10.83 |
| Rodriguez Tony | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2026 | 91,132 | +1,743 | $9.80 |
| Rodriguez Tony | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.5.2026 | 90,515 | -617 | $9.80 |
| Beck Charles | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.5.2026 | 117,310 | -1,848 | $9.80 |
| Beck Charles | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.5.2026 | 119,158 | -967 | $9.80 |
| Quinn Carle Ann | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.5.2026 | 167,414 | -4,055 | $9.80 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
2,483,811 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 2,310,874 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
52.6% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 56.5% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology