Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$36.48
▼ $1.13 (-3.0%)
Market data updated: 09/19 08:29 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/18/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$36.35 - $37.65
52-Week Range
$21.70 - $38.17
Beta
—
Next Earnings
06.11.2026
Support
$27.89
Resistance
$38.17
DBX is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
+18.5% (1Y)
Strengths: 18/30 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $54.18 vs. price $36.48 (+48.5%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Death Cross
SMA 50 recently crossed below SMA 200
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
63
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
3d ago · $37.31
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 11 to 40 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
59
Quality
58
Value
62
Momentum
82
Risk
34
Sentiment
56
Fundamental
58
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Dropbox has centered on its unwavering focus on core business growth in file storage and collaboration, as highlighted by RBC Capital Markets, alongside strong investor sentiment reflected in its stock performance—up nearly 30% year-to-date. Additionally, a security breach exposed nearly 5,000 accounts via a Lenovo ID integration, prompting a shutdown of that feature and ongoing investigations. Analysts like RBC reiterated an "Outperform" rating with a $42 price target, while broader market trends briefly lifted the stock alongside software peers.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Dropbox, Inc.. News trend score: 56. Reason: 8 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 7 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
23
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
41
Psychology
26
Fundamentals
58
Technical
82
Valuation
62
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
+40%
Market Narrative
42
Fundamental Reality
41
Narrative Gap
+1
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
DBX’s psychology is fragmented, with no single dominant state but notable tension between euphoric valuation metrics and bleak sentiment. The 24.7% premium over the 200-day average clashes with a near-neutral RSI and extreme negative sentiment, suggesting traders may be overvaluing recent gains while ignoring broader pessimism. Anchoring near resistance (4.4%) hints at potential reluctance to push higher, while the absence of herding or panic signals implies a lack of clear directional conviction. The key question is whether traders will sustain the disconnect between valuation optimism and market sentiment—or if a shift in either will force a re-evaluation.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 04:51 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"management still treats growth in the core file storage and collaboration business as its main directive"
"RBC Capital reiterates Dropbox (NASDAQ:DBX) with a **Outperform** and maintains $42 price target"
"nearly 5,000 accounts were compromised via a Lenovo ID integration"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 11D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 77/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 2/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for DBX reflects deep philosophical and methodological splits among the investors. Peter Lynch’s high score and bullish growth candidate label contrast sharply with the extreme caution of Walter Bagehot and Benjamin Graham’s Enterprising Investor, who see it as statistically overpriced or structurally risky. Meanwhile, value-focused thinkers like Graham (traditional) and Loeb flag red flags around stability and risk, while growth-oriented Fisher and Schwager’s wizards dismiss it outright for lacking signature traits. The middle-ground methodologies—Marks, Veblen, and Nelson—suggest nuanced concerns, hinting at potential overvaluation or unclear profit translation, while Mackay’s neutral stance on crowd behavior doesn’t amplify the bull case. The divergence underscores whether DBX is a speculative bet (Lynch) or a high-risk, low-reward play (Bagehot/Graham), with most frameworks leaning toward skepticism.
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 77
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 65
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 64
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 58
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 56
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 53
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 48
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 44
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 43
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 40
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 36
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 30
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 30
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 28
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 4
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 2
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 40%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (10 bullish · 1 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
80.1%
Operating Margin
27.3%
Net Margin
20.2%
EBITDA Margin
27.3%
ROE
-28.3%
ROA
17.9%
ROIC
—
EPS
$1.89
Cash
$891.30M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
0.63
Debt/Equity
—
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$36.48
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$54.18
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+48.5%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
2.8%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.8% | $956.85M | $877.84M |
| 2 | 2.7% | $982.91M | $827.30M |
| 3 | 2.6% | $1.01B | $779.10M |
| 4 | 2.6% | $1.03B | $733.17M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $1.06B | $689.45M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$930.80M
Terminal Value
$16.73B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$10.87B
Enterprise Value
$14.78B
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$14.78B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
-$6.59
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$8.38
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 8 positive, 5 neutral, 7 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
Zacks · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
PR Newswire · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
FreightWaves · 10.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
Business Wire · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 5.9.2026
Yahoo · 5.9.2026
MT Newswires · 4.9.2026
StockStory · 3.9.2026
Dropbox, Inc. (DBX) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 63/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
DBX currently scores 63/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, DBX's estimated fair value is $54.18, which is 48.5% above the current price of $36.48. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
DBX's technical score is 82/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $54.18 vs. price $36.48 (+48.5%); Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 32.9%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: SMA 50 recently crossed below SMA 200; Current ratio: 0.63; Calmar: 0.30 (3y annualized return 11.2% / max drawdown 37.4%).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for DBX.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 15 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yoon William T | Open Market Sale | 4.9.2026 | 12,382 | -12,382 | $34.78 |
| Campbell Lisa M | Open Market Sale | 4.9.2026 | 4,598 | -4,598 | $34.78 |
| Torres Michael Ivan | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 842,316 | +842,316 | — |
| Yoon William T | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 28,945 | +28,945 | — |
| Tennenbaum Ross | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 28,945 | +28,945 | — |
| Schubach Sarah Elizabeth | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 21,709 | +21,709 | — |
| Schubach Sarah Elizabeth | Open Market Sale | 31.8.2026 | 1,631 | -1,631 | $35.50 |
| Schubach Sarah Elizabeth | Open Market Sale | 20.8.2026 | 1,631 | -1,631 | $34.01 |
| Schubach Sarah Elizabeth | Open Market Sale | 20.8.2026 | 116,781 | -1,631 | $34.01 |
| Dasdan Ali | Open Market Sale | 18.8.2026 | 11,332 | -11,332 | $34.13 |
| Webster Eric T | Open Market Sale | 18.8.2026 | 15,830 | -15,830 | $34.09 |
| Dasdan Ali | Tax Withholding in Shares | 17.8.2026 | 19,255 | -19,255 | $34.42 |
| Schubach Sarah Elizabeth | Tax Withholding in Shares | 17.8.2026 | 5,854 | -5,854 | $34.42 |
| Yoon William T | Tax Withholding in Shares | 17.8.2026 | 16,833 | -16,833 | $34.42 |
| Alkarmi Ashraf | Tax Withholding in Shares | 17.8.2026 | 47,865 | -47,865 | $34.42 |
| Webster Eric T | Tax Withholding in Shares | 17.8.2026 | 14,820 | -14,820 | $34.42 |
| Tennenbaum Ross | Tax Withholding in Shares | 17.8.2026 | 20,326 | -20,326 | $34.42 |
| Schubach Sarah Elizabeth | Open Market Sale | 31.7.2026 | 1,632 | -1,632 | $31.61 |
| Schubach Sarah Elizabeth | Open Market Sale | 31.7.2026 | 124,266 | -1,632 | $31.61 |
| Peacock Karen | Open Market Sale | 29.7.2026 | 2,000 | -2,000 | $33.00 |
| Peacock Karen | Open Market Sale | 29.7.2026 | 22,366 | -2,000 | $33.00 |
| Schubach Sarah Elizabeth | Open Market Sale | 15.7.2026 | 1,306 | -1,306 | $30.13 |
| Schubach Sarah Elizabeth | Open Market Sale | 15.7.2026 | 125,898 | -1,306 | $30.13 |
| Dasdan Ali | Open Market Sale | 14.7.2026 | 12,972 | -12,972 | $30.00 |
| Dasdan Ali | Open Market Sale | 14.7.2026 | 501,639 | -12,972 | $30.00 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
25,683,604 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 26,742,234 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
71.3% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 73.2% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology