Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$55.34
▼ $0.05 (-0.1%)
Market data updated: 09/21 09:59 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/21/2026
News analyzed: 09/21/2026
Market Cap
$461.50M
Day Range
$54.37 - $56.50
52-Week Range
$29.60 - $77.91
Beta
—
Next Earnings
30.11.2026
Support
$54.37
Resistance
$77.91
CTRN is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
+70.9% (1Y)
Strengths: 3/25 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 112.1%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is eroding over time
Quality
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (68/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (45/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
45
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
68
Quality
42
Value
45
Momentum
16
Risk
42
Sentiment
92
Fundamental
41
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Citi Trends, Inc. recent coverage highlights its eighth straight quarter of double‑digit comparable‑store sales growth in Q2 2026, turning the streak into actual profit with a swing to $5.5 million adjusted EBITDA and margin expansion. The retailer raised full‑year guidance but analysts caution that the stock trades at a high ~33× earnings valuation, capping upside potential.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Citi Trends, Inc.. News trend score: 92. Reason: 8 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
41
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
36
Psychology
65
Fundamentals
41
Technical
16
Valuation
45
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Price (3M)
-11%
Market Narrative
49
Fundamental Reality
36
Narrative Gap
+13
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for CTRN suggests a clear dominance of euphoria, fueled by a significant price premium above its 200-day average and uniformly positive sentiment. The narrative gap (23 points) further implies investors are overestimating upside potential relative to current fundamentals. While FOMO exists at low levels, it’s contained by neutral RSI and modest volume. The key open question is whether this euphoria reflects justified optimism or an unsustainable disconnect from underlying fundamentals.
Updated: 09/07/2026, 04:40 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"eighth consecutive quarter of comp sales growth with raised full-year guidance"
"adjusted EBITDA swings to a $5.5 million profit"
"raised full-year guidance"
"higher margins and a return to positive adjusted EBITDA"
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 99/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on his documented principles, the model estimates that Peter Lynch’s approach gives CTRN a relatively high score of 65, labeling it mixed because growth is present but already priced in. For Burton Malkiel & John Bogle’s efficient‑market view the score is 58, also mixed, indicating the stock does not provide strong evidence to outperform a broad index. Mid‑cycle investors such as Samuel Armstrong Nelson rate the stock at 54, seeing no clear signal, while more cautious strategists like Gerald M.‑Loeb and Benjamin Graham assign very low scores (24 and 2 respectively), flagging high risk and failure of defensive criteria. Overall the spread from 65 down to 0 shows that some historic methodologies see modest upside potential, whereas others highlight valuation, stability, and volatility concerns that would make them wary of the position.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 99
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 87
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 71
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 67
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 57
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 52
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 47
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 40
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 33
Weak case — Malkiel/Bogle would say a low-cost index is the simpler bet
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 31
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 23
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 22
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 10
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 3
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 2
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 282 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 10 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
0.5%
Net Margin
0.6%
EBITDA Margin
2.7%
ROE
4.5%
ROA
1.1%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.65
Cash
$66.09M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
1.11
Debt/Equity
—
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$14.01
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$14.01
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 8 positive, 11 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 20.9.2026
MT Newswires · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Business Wire · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
Motley Fool · 1.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 1.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 27.8.2026
Yahoo · 25.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 25.8.2026
Yahoo · 25.8.2026
Moby · 25.8.2026
Yahoo · 25.8.2026
MarketBeat · 25.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 25.8.2026
Yahoo · 25.8.2026
InvestorsHub · 25.8.2026
Benzinga · 25.8.2026
Associated Press · 25.8.2026
Citi Trends, Inc. (CTRN) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 45/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
CTRN currently scores 45/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
CTRN's technical score is 16/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 112.1%; Net income growth: 112.1%; Price is above the 200-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is eroding over time; ATR: 5.9% of price; Price is below the 50-day average.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for CTRN.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 5 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Powell Lisa A. | Open Market Sale | 4.9.2026 | 10,000 | -10,000 | $70.10 |
| George Katrina | Open Market Sale | 8.7.2026 | 126 | -126 | $56.42 |
| George Katrina | Open Market Sale | 8.7.2026 | 5,713 | -126 | $56.42 |
| Puri Lovesh Kumar | Tax Withholding in Shares | 30.6.2026 | 15 | -15 | $57.84 |
| Koenig Kyle | Tax Withholding in Shares | 30.6.2026 | 27 | -27 | $57.84 |
| Puri Lovesh Kumar | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 41 | +41 | — |
| Plutino Heather L | Tax Withholding in Shares | 30.6.2026 | 66 | -66 | $57.84 |
| George Katrina | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 41 | +41 | — |
| Powell Lisa A. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 30.6.2026 | 71 | -71 | $57.84 |
| Powell Lisa A. | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 239 | +239 | — |
| Plutino Heather L | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 238 | +238 | — |
| Koenig Kyle | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 95 | +95 | — |
| George Katrina | Tax Withholding in Shares | 30.6.2026 | 13 | -13 | $57.84 |
| Puri Lovesh Kumar | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 3,958 | +41 | — |
| Puri Lovesh Kumar | Tax Withholding in Shares | 30.6.2026 | 3,943 | -15 | $57.84 |
| Powell Lisa A. | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 24,041 | +239 | — |
| Powell Lisa A. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 30.6.2026 | 23,970 | -71 | $57.84 |
| Koenig Kyle | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 11,606 | +95 | — |
| Koenig Kyle | Tax Withholding in Shares | 30.6.2026 | 11,579 | -27 | $57.84 |
| George Katrina | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 5,852 | +41 | — |
| George Katrina | Tax Withholding in Shares | 30.6.2026 | 5,839 | -13 | $57.84 |
| Plutino Heather L | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 20,907 | +238 | — |
| Plutino Heather L | Tax Withholding in Shares | 30.6.2026 | 20,841 | -66 | $57.84 |
| Fund 1 Investments, LLC | Open Market Sale | 24.6.2026 | 750,000 | -750,000 | $56.50 |
| Fund 1 Investments, LLC | Open Market Sale | 24.6.2026 | 1,823,486 | -750,000 | $56.50 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
889,704 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 879,456 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
70.7% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 66.8% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology